Jeffrey Epstein And The Alleged Theft Of Millions From His BFF Les Wexner

Juror #50, identified publicly as Scotty David, became a focal point of controversy after Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial. Before the trial, on his juror questionnaire, he answered “no” when asked if he or any close relation had ever been the victim of sexual abuse. But after the verdict, David gave interviews saying he had been sexually abused as a child, and that during jury deliberations he shared parts of that experience to help other jurors understand how memory and trauma work—insisting his personal history informed their view of witness testimony.Maxwell’s defense seized on those revelations, demanding a new trial on the grounds that David’s omission and his post-trial statements suggested bias and a failure of the Court’s vetting process. In response, Judge Alison Nathan held a hearing, granted David immunity to answer questions, and ultimately ruled that his misstatement was an “inadvertent mistake” (not a deliberate lie) and did not prove that he was unable to be fair or had tainted the verdict. The appellate court later agreed, rejecting the retrial request, concluding that David’s presence on the jury did not, under law, amount to a violation of Maxwell’s right to a fair jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

26 Sep 50min

Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch is unmovable at this point, so much so that it has taken another 9.5 million dollar haircut. When you factor in the current market conditions and the fact that interest rates are so high, moving a property as vast, notorious and expensive as Zorro ranch you are looking at quite the task to find a buyer. In this episode, we take a look a the property and some of the reasons why it might not be as hot of a commodity as they estate had hoped.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11471185/Jeffrey-Epsteins-ranch-asking-price-slashed-9-5M-year-half-market.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

26 Sep 13min

Denise George, the former Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, took a highly aggressive approach in pursuing Jeffrey Epstein’s financial network, using subpoenas as her primary weapon. Her office demanded records from major banks—including JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Citibank—seeking detailed information on Epstein’s accounts, shell companies, and offshore structures. She also extended subpoenas to powerful financiers like Leon Black and his firm Apollo Global Management, as well as Glenn Dubin and his wife, requiring them to produce financial statements and communications tied to their dealings with Epstein. These subpoenas aimed to uncover the hidden channels through which Epstein moved money, secured influence, and allegedly funded his trafficking operation.The broader intent behind George’s subpoenas was not just to secure financial restitution from Epstein’s estate, but to expose the web of enablers who may have knowingly or unknowingly facilitated his crimes. Her legal filings accused Epstein and his entities of running a criminal enterprise involving sex trafficking, forced labor, and aggravated sexual assault in the Virgin Islands. By targeting banks and billionaires alike, George’s subpoenas sent a clear message: Epstein’s power was built on institutional complicity, and the only way to dismantle it was to follow the money wherever it led.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 15min

Jeffrey Epstein had several documented parole violations after he "served" his original sentence, yet nothing was ever done about it. Even when he was caught by a police officer in a place where he wasn't supposed to be, his parole officer, Carmen Sloan covered for him, even after her supervisor said that he was in violation. Let's dive in and take a look. (commercial at 10:04)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/story/news/2012/04/01/jeffrey-epstein-house-arrest-missteps/9629975007/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 18min

Bill Barr’s deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein’s death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr’s narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr’s evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump’s knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein’s death but couldn’t recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr’s testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 11min

The Epstein cover-up isn’t just corruption—it’s an insult to everyone’s intelligence. The powerful trot out the same tired lines—“we’re investigating,” “we didn’t know,” “our hands are tied”—while survivors are still screaming and files remain sealed. Politicians pound tables for the cameras, the FBI pretends to be helpless, and institutions hide behind PR spin, charity donations, and crocodile tears. The arrogance is breathtaking: they think if they stall long enough, the public will forget. But the public isn’t forgetting, because everyone knows this wasn’t ignorance—it was complicity.At its core, this isn’t just about Epstein—it’s about a system rotted through with people who knew, who benefited, and who chose to protect themselves instead of the victims. Every sealed file, every redacted name, every “move on” excuse is proof that power protects power at all costs. The outrage won’t fade, because truth doesn’t expire. The longer they bury it, the hotter the rage burns. And when the dam breaks, every enabler—from politicians to royals to institutions that took the money—will drown in the flood of accountability they thought they could dodge.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 11min

The Thomas Massie/Ro Khana discharge petition to bring Jeffrey Epstein’s sealed files to the House floor has surged forward, closing in on the 218 votes required. With all 212 Democrats unified in support, the math is simple: just a handful of Republicans breaking ranks will guarantee the petition’s success. The momentum has been further fueled by the Arizona special election, where the victor pledged to add their name as soon as they’re sworn in, potentially becoming the tipping point.Republican leadership, however, is digging in its heels. Reports have surfaced of threats and pressure campaigns aimed at peeling away GOP support, a reflection of the desperation to keep the vote from hitting the magic number. But if Massie secures the final signatures, leadership will lose control, and the House will be compelled to go on record in full public view. At that moment, lawmakers will have to choose between protecting secrets or siding with transparency—an unavoidable reckoning that could fracture party lines and ignite a political firestorm.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House nears vote to compel release of Jeffrey Epstein filesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Sep 16min