Mega Edition: Jamie Dimon Flirts With A Presidential Run (9/27/25)

Groomed for prominence by birth, Prince Andrew long enjoyed the privileges of closeness to the throne—but following the Epstein scandal and a disastrous BBC interview in 2019, he has increasingly been “iced out” by the rest of the royal family. His public role was dramatically curtailed: he stepped back from official duties, lost many patronages and military titles, and now rarely appears at major royal events. In practice, the palace has treated him more like a liability than a royal asset, often freezing him out of the inner circle in order to protect the monarchy’s image.This distancing sends a powerful message: Andrew’s missteps are deemed too severe for the monarchy to absorb quietly. His marginalization underscores both the internal fractures of the Windsor family and the intensifying scrutiny that now governs royal behavior. The optics of being excluded—ignored by King Charles, side-glanced by Prince William, left at the periphery of high-profile ceremonies—amplify the perception that he is now persona non grata. For an institution built on continuity, duty, and unity, freezing out one of its own exposes the fragility underneath the veneer of royal solidarity.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

28 Sep 13min

The mishandling of Jeffrey Epstein’s story by left-leaning media created a chain reaction of distrust that continues to ripple outward. By dismissing survivor accounts and labeling the scandal as a “right-wing conspiracy” for years, they not only silenced victims but also misled their own audiences into complacency. When the truth finally broke open, people who leaned left politically were shocked to discover how horrifying Epstein’s crimes really were and how deeply entrenched the system protecting him had been. That betrayal of trust didn’t just harm survivors—it left the public vulnerable to political manipulation.Into this vacuum stepped Donald Trump and his allies, who now weaponize the media’s past failures by calling the entire Epstein affair a hoax. Because mainstream outlets once minimized or mocked the story, Trump can frame it as just another example of “fake news.” This tactic allows him and his base to dismiss the overwhelming evidence while undermining survivor testimony, further eroding accountability. The end result is a scandal that should have united people in outrage but instead has been twisted into partisan noise, leaving survivors betrayed yet again and the public more divided than ever.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

28 Sep 10min

The mishandling of Jeffrey Epstein’s story by left-leaning media created a chain reaction of distrust that continues to ripple outward. By dismissing survivor accounts and labeling the scandal as a “right-wing conspiracy” for years, they not only silenced victims but also misled their own audiences into complacency. When the truth finally broke open, people who leaned left politically were shocked to discover how horrifying Epstein’s crimes really were and how deeply entrenched the system protecting him had been. That betrayal of trust didn’t just harm survivors—it left the public vulnerable to political manipulation.Into this vacuum stepped Donald Trump and his allies, who now weaponize the media’s past failures by calling the entire Epstein affair a hoax. Because mainstream outlets once minimized or mocked the story, Trump can frame it as just another example of “fake news.” This tactic allows him and his base to dismiss the overwhelming evidence while undermining survivor testimony, further eroding accountability. The end result is a scandal that should have united people in outrage but instead has been twisted into partisan noise, leaving survivors betrayed yet again and the public more divided than ever.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

28 Sep 11min

The mishandling of Jeffrey Epstein’s story by left-leaning media created a chain reaction of distrust that continues to ripple outward. By dismissing survivor accounts and labeling the scandal as a “right-wing conspiracy” for years, they not only silenced victims but also misled their own audiences into complacency. When the truth finally broke open, people who leaned left politically were shocked to discover how horrifying Epstein’s crimes really were and how deeply entrenched the system protecting him had been. That betrayal of trust didn’t just harm survivors—it left the public vulnerable to political manipulation.Into this vacuum stepped Donald Trump and his allies, who now weaponize the media’s past failures by calling the entire Epstein affair a hoax. Because mainstream outlets once minimized or mocked the story, Trump can frame it as just another example of “fake news.” This tactic allows him and his base to dismiss the overwhelming evidence while undermining survivor testimony, further eroding accountability. The end result is a scandal that should have united people in outrage but instead has been twisted into partisan noise, leaving survivors betrayed yet again and the public more divided than ever.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

28 Sep 13min

The Clinton family’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein has been one of the most scrutinized and damaging associations to emerge from the scandal, exposing a troubling web of proximity, power, and privilege. Bill Clinton’s documented flights aboard Epstein’s private jet—the so-called “Lolita Express”—numbered more than two dozen, with flight logs showing trips to Europe, Asia, and Africa, sometimes without his Secret Service detail. While Clinton has insisted these trips were tied to philanthropic work through the Clinton Foundation, the sheer frequency and secrecy surrounding certain flights raise glaring red flags. Adding to this is Clinton’s presence at Epstein’s Little St. James island and his connection to Ghislaine Maxwell, who attended Chelsea Clinton’s wedding in 2010—long after Epstein’s first conviction. These details collectively paint a picture not of incidental overlap, but of deliberate and sustained association with a man whose reputation as a predator was already widely known.Defenders of the Clintons argue that Epstein, like many wealthy figures, sought to ingratiate himself with power players and that Clinton’s interactions were primarily transactional or charity-driven. Yet this explanation does little to erase the optics of a former U.S. president and his inner circle maintaining close contact with a convicted sex offender. Even if Clinton was never directly implicated in Epstein’s crimes, his repeated willingness to leverage Epstein’s resources—and the willingness of his family to include figures like Maxwell in intimate social functions—suggests either staggering negligence or a calculated gamble that the association would remain buried. For a political dynasty built on the currency of influence, the Epstein connection remains a gaping vulnerability, one that feeds into broader skepticism about how elites shield themselves while victims are left behind.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

28 Sep 1h 11min

Jeffrey Epstein, Glenn Dubin, and Les Wexner’s collective ties to Harvard University expose a deeply unsettling nexus of wealth, influence, and compromised morality within one of the world’s most prestigious academic institutions. Epstein, despite his 2008 conviction, donated millions to Harvard, including $6.5 million to the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, securing not only access to the university’s intellectual elite but also legitimacy that helped launder his reputation. Glenn Dubin, a hedge fund billionaire and close Epstein associate, reinforced these connections through philanthropy and elite social networks, while his wife, Eva Andersson-Dubin, had an even more personal history with Epstein, further entwining Harvard’s image with the scandal. Les Wexner, Epstein’s most significant benefactor and a longtime Harvard donor himself, indirectly strengthened Epstein’s foothold within the institution, with his fortune and backing lending weight to Epstein’s cultivated status as a man of ideas and influence. Together, these men leveraged Harvard’s prestige as both a shield and a stage, providing Epstein with credibility in academic and scientific circles that should have been out of reach for a registered sex offender.Harvard’s willingness to accept and defend these relationships, even after Epstein’s criminal record was public, reflects not only institutional greed but also a failure of ethical leadership. While Harvard has since tried to distance itself, the revelations that Epstein maintained an office on campus, retained connections with professors, and used his donations to secure influence long after his conviction speak to a systemic rot. Wexner’s fortune, Dubin’s networks, and Epstein’s money intersected at Harvard in ways that revealed how elite institutions often prioritize financial gain over moral responsibility. Rather than protecting its integrity or safeguarding its reputation, Harvard enabled Epstein’s rehabilitation, offering him cover while he cultivated ties with powerful men like Dubin and Wexner. In doing so, the university not only failed its own values but also became an unwitting accomplice in sustaining the ecosystem that allowed Epstein to thrive.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

28 Sep 55min

Bill Clinton’s repeated use of Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet remains one of the most glaring and troubling aspects of their association, undercutting every attempt by the former president to minimize the depth of their relationship. Flight logs reveal that Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane dozens of times, traveling to destinations across the globe under the guise of humanitarian work tied to the Clinton Foundation. Yet the sheer number of trips—some of them occurring without Secret Service protection—raises uncomfortable questions about what, exactly, Clinton was doing on these flights and why secrecy seemed necessary. Reports that Clinton was such a frequent passenger that he even had a preferred seat on the plane only reinforce the impression that this was not a casual or incidental relationship, but a sustained and comfortable arrangement. For a man of Clinton’s stature and experience, the defense that he simply didn’t know who he was associating with strains credibility to the breaking point.The optics of Clinton’s repeated presence on a plane nicknamed the “Lolita Express” are damning in themselves, but the broader context makes it worse. Epstein’s reputation, even before his 2008 conviction, was hardly a mystery in elite circles, and yet Clinton not only tolerated but embraced the relationship, treating Epstein’s jet as a reliable means of travel. That level of reliance suggests not just convenience, but trust and familiarity—an intimacy of association that cannot be brushed aside with vague claims of philanthropy. Critics argue that Clinton’s pattern of behavior exemplifies the entitlement of political elites: secure in the belief that their actions would never be scrutinized, they engaged with Epstein freely, assuming the scandal would never surface. Today, the image of Clinton as a “regular” on Epstein’s plane is more than a bad look; it is a lasting stain that calls into question his judgment, his honesty, and his willingness to blur lines between personal indulgence and public responsibility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

28 Sep 39min

The Maxwell family has been vocal in their condemnation of the conditions Ghislaine Maxwell has endured while incarcerated, painting a grim picture of treatment they argue is both punitive and prejudicial. They described her time at the Metropolitan Detention Center as “inhumane,” citing reports of sleep deprivation, lack of adequate nutrition, and harsh surveillance measures. Her siblings compared her confinement to conditions closer to torture than justice, emphasizing that she was being treated as if already guilty long before her trial concluded. These claims were part of a broader strategy to cast Maxwell as a victim of a system intent on breaking her down physically and mentally, a narrative the family pushed in interviews and public statements in an effort to sway public opinion. Whether out of genuine concern or calculated spin, the family’s portrayal of Ghislaine’s jail conditions framed her as a scapegoat, arguing she was being punished not just for her own alleged crimes but for the sins of Jeffrey Epstein.Their criticism extended to Judge Alison Nathan’s denial of Maxwell’s request for a new trial, which the family cast as further evidence of judicial bias. They argued that the judge ignored valid grounds raised by Maxwell’s legal team, particularly surrounding questions of juror misconduct and fairness of the proceedings. In the family’s telling, Judge Nathan’s rulings demonstrated a determination to secure a conviction at all costs, reinforcing their view that Maxwell was being railroaded to provide the public with a substitute for Epstein. By attacking both the conditions of confinement and the court’s rejection of post-trial motions, the Maxwell family sought to construct a narrative in which Ghislaine was the target of systemic overreach. To her critics, however, these complaints rang hollow, serving more as an attempt to rehabilitate the Maxwell name than as a credible indictment of the justice system.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

28 Sep 53min