Mega Edition: The Release Of The Epstein GJ Documents Inches Closer To The Finish Line (10/3/25)

The PROMIS software scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein case, while separated by decades and context, share strikingly similar hallmarks. PROMIS began as a prosecutorial tool but was allegedly modified by intelligence services like Mossad to include backdoors, enabling covert surveillance when installed in foreign governments and financial institutions. Robert Maxwell, the British media tycoon and suspected Mossad operative, was said to have played a major role in distributing this compromised software worldwide. His involvement linked media, finance, and espionage, and his mysterious death only deepened suspicions. PROMIS thus became emblematic of how intelligence agencies use front men, plausible enterprises, and legal suppression to conceal operations while extracting information and leverage from their targets.Epstein’s operation followed a parallel structure. Through Ghislaine Maxwell — Robert Maxwell’s daughter — the same networks of access and intelligence may have carried forward into a different form of compromise: sexual blackmail rather than software surveillance. Epstein’s properties were wired for monitoring, his connections spanned politics and finance, and his prosecution was undermined by plea deals and sealed files, much like PROMIS inquiries were stifled by classified reports and redactions. In both scandals, powerful people were protected, evidence was obscured, and key figures died under suspicious circumstances. The echoes between PROMIS and Epstein suggest not isolated scandals but a recurring playbook of intelligence tradecraft: fronts, leverage, secrecy, and coverups designed to protect those at the very top.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

3 Okt 12min

The release of the 2006 Florida grand jury records tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s first arrest had a very specific date: July 1, 2024. That date was not chosen at random — it was the exact day that Florida’s new law, HB 117, went into effect. This law created the first-ever pathway to unseal grand jury materials in cases involving sexual offenses with minors if the subject of the investigation was deceased. Palm Beach Circuit Judge Luis Delgado signed the release order the same morning the law became active, marking a coordinated legal and legislative milestone after years of stonewalling. By that afternoon, Palm Beach County Clerk Joe Abruzzo confirmed that the documents were officially public.The release of the 2006 Florida grand jury records tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s first arrest had a very specific date: July 1, 2024. That date was not chosen at random — it was the exact day that Florida’s new law, HB 117, went into effect. This law created the first-ever pathway to unseal grand jury materials in cases involving sexual offenses with minors if the subject of the investigation was deceased. Palm Beach Circuit Judge Luis Delgado signed the release order the same morning the law became active, marking a coordinated legal and legislative milestone after years of stonewalling. By that afternoon, Palm Beach County Clerk Joe Abruzzo confirmed that the documents were officially public.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

3 Okt 22min

For years, the transcripts and evidence from the 2006 Palm Beach County grand jury — convened to investigate Epstein’s alleged sexual exploitation of minors — remained sealed under Florida’s strict grand jury secrecy rules. Media organizations (notably the Palm Beach Post) and public interest groups repeatedly sought access, arguing that the public needed transparency about why only a single solicitation-of-prostitution charge was returned despite far more serious allegations. These petitions were denied by lower courts, which held that under existing law, judges lacked authority to override the secrecy protections. That changed when Florida’s Legislature in 2024 passed HB 117, a law tailored to allow disclosure of grand jury materials in cases involving sexual activity with minors and deceased defendants. Gov. Ron DeSantis signed it into law, making it possible (beginning July 1, 2024) for a judge to order release of those previously sealed transcripts.In July 2024, Palm Beach Circuit Judge Luis Delgado ordered the release of about 150 pages of those transcripts. The unsealed records showed that prosecutors had presented testimony from two alleged underage victims, police officers, and others — but rather than focusing squarely on Epstein’s alleged abuse, the questioning at times shifted toward whether the victims themselves could face criminal liability. The transcripts also confirmed prosecutors had been aware of rape and trafficking allegations well before Epstein’s 2008 plea deal, fueling arguments that the case was deliberately undercharged to shield him. Even after this release, large portions of the records remained redacted, leaving critics to argue that the state had still not provided full accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

3 Okt 47min

A provocative billboard in New York criticized Prince Andrew by mocking his alleged involvement in the Epstein scandal. The billboard, erected by a Manhattan storage company, used a tongue-in-cheek approach to highlight the sex abuse allegations and the multimillion-dollar settlement he reached with Virginia Giuffre. Its message forced the public and media to confront a topic that many prefer to evade: the intersection of royalty, privilege, and alleged trafficking.The billboard’s appearance illustrates how public activism and visual protest can pierce institutional silence. It turned a whisper campaign into a street-level accusation, making it harder for powerful actors to ignore or downplay. In doing so, it reinforced the idea that accountability and justice won’t always come from elite institutions—that sometimes the most effective pressure comes from the margins demanding attention.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

3 Okt 14min

The story begins with a shadowy figure using the alias “Patrick Kessler,” who contacted high-profile lawyers claiming he had access to an encrypted archive of Epstein’s surveillance footage — including videos allegedly implicating powerful individuals. Kessler persuaded respected attorneys like David Boies and John Pottinger to engage with him, proposing schemes in which those incriminated would pay large private settlements (some proceeds earmarked for victims) to keep the footage hidden. The lawyers—even while representing Epstein’s accusers—were accused of attempting to profit by holding this “evidence” hostage. Over months of negotiations, The New York Times was brought in as a possible media outlet to pressure the men on the so-called “hot list.” But none of the promised videos ever materialized, and Kessler later claimed his servers were destroyed in a fire, forcing him to flee.Critics argue that Boies’s deep involvement in the Kessler scheme blurred ethical lines: a lawyer advocating for victims who also appeared poised to monetize secret evidence placed him in a conflicted position. The Times, meanwhile, has been faulted for its handling of the story—reporting Kessler’s claims without sufficiently flagging how unverified they were, or how they played into an opportunistic playbook of legal maneuvering over actual justice. Some see the Kessler-Boies-Times saga as illustrative of how even institutions considered pillars of integrity can become complicit in obfuscation, leveraging sensational claims for influence rather than holding the powerful accountable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

3 Okt 51min

Mark John Dougan, a former Palm Beach County deputy sheriff who later fled to Russia, has claimed that Jeffrey Epstein’s homes were heavily wired with cameras and that “thousands” of tapes existed documenting sexual encounters with wealthy and powerful figures. He has argued that law enforcement deliberately overlooked or failed to secure this evidence, suggesting that the missing recordings were the result of collusion or a cover-up. Dougan also alleged that Epstein was granted privileges in jail that no ordinary inmate would receive, including favorable deputies overseeing his confinement, further pointing to special treatment. In his telling, Epstein’s entire operation functioned as a blackmail machine designed to ensnare and control elites.However, these claims remain unverified and highly controversial. Dougan is widely seen as a conspiracy figure, and no independent evidence has surfaced to support his assertions about tapes or DVDs. Critics note his history of legal troubles in the U.S., his relocation to Russia, and his ties to disinformation activity—all of which undermine his credibility. While his statements have gained traction in some circles hungry for answers, mainstream investigators and journalists caution that his claims should be viewed with skepticism until corroborated by reliable evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

2 Okt 15min

Critics argue that the Epstein–Maxwell–Prince Andrew saga showcased the two-tier justice system in stark relief. Epstein’s infamous 2008 Florida plea deal, which let him plead guilty to lesser state charges and avoid sweeping federal prosecution, has been described as the clearest example of justice bending for the powerful. Critics note that any ordinary defendant facing similar charges would likely have received decades in federal prison rather than a lenient sentence that allowed Epstein day release and minimal oversight.In contrast, Maxwell became the only major figure from Epstein’s circle to face a lengthy prison term, while many alleged co-conspirators avoided charges altogether. Prince Andrew, despite being accused in a civil suit brought by Virginia Giuffre, evaded criminal liability entirely and settled quietly out of court without admitting wrongdoing. To survivors and legal critics, the contrast makes clear that elite figures with wealth, influence, and royal status have means to shield themselves from consequences that others would inevitably face.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

2 Okt 15min