521: Redefining risk: How to build a career through bold actions (with Christie Hunter Arscott)

521: Redefining risk: How to build a career through bold actions (with Christie Hunter Arscott)

Welcome to an episode with an award-winning advisor, speaker, and author, Christie Hunter Arscott. Get Christie's book here: https://amzn.to/3Qia05S

Most of the time, the word risk is associated with fear and uncertainty. We tend to struggle with harnessing the power of risk-taking. But the first bold step sheds light on that. As Christie mentioned in this episode, "An intentional and strategic risk, even when the output is not what you desired, still can propel you further than if you made the consistent choice to play it safe."

In this episode, we discussed the power of intentional risk-taking in building one's career. We spoke about how to encourage women to take chances on themselves to face intentional, intelligent, and strategic risks.

Christie Hunter Arscott is a leading expert on how we can harness the power of intentional risk-taking to create more dynamic and vibrant careers and organizations. A Rhodes Scholar, Christie has been named by Thinkers50 as one of the top management thinkers likely to shape the future of business. Christie was also selected for the biannual Thinkers50 Talent Award shortlist of the top global thought leaders in the field of talent management.

Christie's research and writing have been featured across international publications, including Harvard Business Review, Forbes, Fortune, European Business Review, TIME, Fast Company, Business Insider, and more. Her article "Why So Many Thirtysomething Women Are Leaving Your Company" was selected for the Harvard Business Review collection of the top articles on diversity.

Christie has spoken worldwide to organizations and institutions, including the World Economic Forum, Harvard Business School, the University of Oxford, and the Global Women's Forum for the Economy and Society. Her corporate clients include Bacardi, Deloitte, PWC, HSBC, and more.

Christie holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science from Brown University, a certificate of Distinction in General Management from Stanford University's Graduate School of Business and two Master's degrees with a focus on gender research from the University of Oxford. She currently serves on the Women's Leadership Board of the Women and Public Policy Program at Harvard Kennedy School.

Get Christie's book here:

Begin Boldly: How Women Can Reimagine Risk, Embrace Uncertainty, and Launch a Brilliant Career. Christie Hunter Arscott. https://amzn.to/3Qia05S

Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo

Avsnitt(817)

156: Key Differences in Bain FIT Questions

156: Key Differences in Bain FIT Questions

In looking through our database of over 240 former clients and speaking to Bain partners we know, we see two unique ways a Bain fit interview differs from a McKinsey PEI. The first relates to way in which you interact with the interviewer as you deliver your response, and the second relates to a very specific attribute that Bain seeks in your fit responses. Both differ substantially from a McKinsey or BCG interview. In fact, EVERY single client we placed at Bain strongly displayed these two characteristics. It is uncanny how close a correlation exists.

16 Sep 201313min

155: Bonus vs. Salary Resume Editing

155: Bonus vs. Salary Resume Editing

Bonus versus salary resumes, is a very simple test we do on resumes. This podcast explains the test. We basically look at whether or not a bullet point explains an action which earned you a salary or would have resulted in a bonus. The latter is vital and the former should be purged from your salary. McKinsey looks for things on your resume which earned you your resume. It is important to understand that merely doing your job is not an achievement in itself.

10 Sep 20138min

154: Economic Impact of Poor Business Judgement

154: Economic Impact of Poor Business Judgement

The economic impact of poor business judgement, is a topic we managed every day as partners. Each time an associate made a poor "common sense" decision we needed to explain both the potential reputation and economic damage done to the firm. The former is well-known, but the latter is less known but just as important. In thinking through why consulting firms look for business judgement, it helps to consider the economic impact to clients and the firm.

4 Sep 20137min

153: Generating Multiple Creative Hypotheses

153: Generating Multiple Creative Hypotheses

Building of our technique to develop hypotheses, this podcast explains a clever way to generate creative hypotheses. In essence, the podcast will be useful to candidates who have already seen how we brainstorm and generate hypotheses, since this podcast expands on that thinking. The core of this idea is that if more than one structure can be brainstormed for a case, each of those structures can be used to develop a new type of hypothesis. This is a very, very simple technique as well.

29 Aug 20137min

151: Read Exhibits as Maps For Insights

151: Read Exhibits as Maps For Insights

In this podcast present a clever technique to treat graphs as "maps" when reading them. Corporate Finance candidates will like this. The key to this technique rests on the simple idea of ignoring the data plots and first trying to understand what the type of graph is saying. Once this is clear, the data is then examined within the graph to understand its meaning. The podcast explains this with an example and is a very effective tool we use for teaching clients.

23 Aug 20136min

150: McKinsey Senior Partner Networking Success

150: McKinsey Senior Partner Networking Success

We always ask our clients, especially those from weaker schools, to network with the most senior partners of consulting firms. This is a podcast about a PhD client, from a weaker school and no existing consulting relationships, who painfully followed this advice over several months to network with a member of McKinsey's worldwide leadership and obtain interviews for his office of choice. It is not easy, but can be done. It works.

17 Aug 201310min

149: Why To Bring Energy To The Interview

149: Why To Bring Energy To The Interview

Lots of candidates leave it to the interviewer to determine the energy levels, tone and mood of the call. That is a bad idea. In our experience, the best candidates always bring a light mood to interviews. Seriousness, can hurt you as it is confused for anxiousness. Delegating the mood to the interview is bad idea since it means the energy of the case will be largely out of your control. Moreover, unless you practice controlling the energy, it is unlikely you will have this skill to deploy in the case interview itself.

10 Aug 20135min

148: Making sexist comments in interviews

148: Making sexist comments in interviews

Due to culture, tradition and even good intentions, candidates make sexist remarks. Sometimes, a very innocent remark may come across as sexist. This podcast examines some the incidences we have encountered which have hurt candidates in cases. It is wise to think about your own inadvertent sexist behavior.

4 Aug 20132min

Populärt inom Business & ekonomi

framgangspodden
badfluence
varvet
rss-jossan-nina
rss-svart-marknad
uppgang-och-fall
rss-borsens-finest
lastbilspodden
rss-dagen-med-di
rss-kort-lang-analyspodden-fran-di
affarsvarlden
fill-or-kill
avanzapodden
borsmorgon
rss-inga-dumma-fragor-om-pengar
rss-en-rik-historia
bathina-en-podcast
24fragor
market-makers
kvalitetsaktiepodden