565: 10 proven rules to succeed in tech stock investing (with Mark Mahaney)

565: 10 proven rules to succeed in tech stock investing (with Mark Mahaney)

For this episode we interviewed one of Wall Street's legendary tech analysts, Mark Mahaney.

In this episode, Mark discusses ten lessons that are proven to help investors succeed in tech stock investing. He shares powerful advice and knowledge from analyzing the most explosive sector on Wall Street over the past quarter century.

Lesson 1: There Will Be Blood… When You Pick Bad Stocks
Lesson 2: You Can Lose $...Even When You Pick The Best Stocks
Lesson 3: Don't Play Quarters
Lesson 4: Revenue Matters More Than Anything
Lesson 5: It Doesn't Mean a Thing, If It Ain't Got That Product Swing
Lesson 6: TAMs - The Bigger The Better
Lesson 7: Follow the Value Prop, Not the Money
Lesson 8: Management Matters Most
Lesson 9: Look for Ballpark Reasonable Valuation
Lesson 10: Hunt for DHQs - Dislocated High-Quality Stocks

Mark Mahaney has been covering internet stocks on Wall Street since 1998, with Morgan Stanley, American Technology Research, Citibank, RBC Capital Markets, and Evercore ISI. Institutional Investor magazine has ranked him as a top Internet analyst every year for the past 15 years, including five years as number one, and he has been ranked by the Financial Times and StarMine as the number-one earnings estimator and stock picker. In addition, TipRanks has placed Mahaney in the top one percent of all Wall Street analysts in terms of single-year stock picking performance.

Get Mark's book here:

Nothing But Net: 10 Timeless Stock-Picking Lessons from One of Wall Street's Top Tech Analysts. Mark Mahaney

Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo

Avsnitt(815)

112: Why You Need Case Interview Structures

112: Why You Need Case Interview Structures

Despite the words "framework" and "structure" used so often, most candidates cannot explain what it is and why it is used. Unless you know the latter, you tend to misuse the framework and incorrectly use it in a case. This podcast presents the need for case structures from the viewpoint of the interviewer or engagement partner. It indicates that case structures are not there merely to guide you, but to guide the person guiding you. And if you extend this to its logical conclusion, if the framework is their to guide the interviewer, then communicating your structure and thinking becomes very important.

6 Jan 201311min

111: Drowning in Case Feedback

111: Drowning in Case Feedback

We find many candidates drown in feedback. They want as much good feedback as possible and speak to as many people as possible thereby receiving lots of detailed and sometimes average feedback on their performance. There are two problems here. First, much of this feedback will likely be contradictory and possibly misleading. Second, the candidate will literally drown in this feedback usually consisting of a 2-page list of improvement areas. We expect our candidates to always prioritize the top 3 issues and tackle them, as explained in this podcast. It is vital to follow this 80/20 principle and ignore the majority which will be of little value overall.

31 Dec 20128min

110: Disclosure Rules on Resumes

110: Disclosure Rules on Resumes

Candidates sometimes divulge too much confidential details, or too little in interviews, resumes, cover letters and LinkedIn profiles. These are the rules for disclosure. It is important to remember that disclosing confidential information merely indicates to McKinsey that you cannot be trusted with their own client information. Moreover, disclosing information on your resume and hiding it from your LinkedIn merely means you are aware of the ethical breach you are making. It is important to avoid these problems at all costs. From the beginning, be the person that is worthy of a consulting firm.

25 Dec 20127min

109: Build Hypotheses With Decision Trees

109: Build Hypotheses With Decision Trees

Building hypotheses is very difficult. Most candidates in a McKinsey, BCG et al interview would not know when to build the hypothesis, what comprises the hypothesis, how to test if it is MECE etc. This simple technique is one way to build hypotheses and used on real consulting engagements. It was developed to help candidates prioritize their analyzes and ensure the hypotheses are MECE. When practicing this technique note that the development of the decision tree must be done quickly and cleanly.

19 Dec 20129min

108: Speed is the Wrong Focus Area

108: Speed is the Wrong Focus Area

Far too many candidates focus on being faster. That is another myth. Speed is an outcome of having good technique. So if you are slow, deconstruct your technique, analyze weaknesses and develop a new way to solve arithmetic. That is key. Unless your technique improves aka "your process to solve math," you will never improve. We explain how in this podcast. Moreover, if an interviewer or practice partner indicates you are slow, think carefully if your technique can be improved, versus merely trying to speak faster. Note, there are many different techniques to solve arithmetic problems so do not search for the "best" technique. Find one that works for you..

13 Dec 20128min

107: Demand Side Estimation Myth

107: Demand Side Estimation Myth

The myth of demand side estimation cases is the greatest mistake taught in case books worldwide and is probably the worst technique a candidate should be using. Candidates around the world are taught that all estimation cases are market sizing cases and all market sizing cases must be done from the demand side. The problem is that not all estimation cases are market sizing cases and not all market sizing cases should be done from the demand side. Fortunately, it is easy to fix

7 Dec 20129min

106: Invisible Presentation Technique

106: Invisible Presentation Technique

Solving a case while talking an interviewer through your thinking (written or otherwise) is, for the interviewer, a little like trying to understand a presentation without seeing the slides. Or at the very least seeing untidy slides – that is, assuming your working sheets are messy. Here we talk through the anatomy of a case dialogue pointing out key mistakes candidates make and a very simple technique they can use when communicating in case interviews.

1 Dec 201212min

105: Case length and details

105: Case length and details

When we ask candidates for more details in their resume, fit responses and cover letter, they always write longer sentences. There is an important difference between "more details" and "greater length". Most candidates are accustomed to spending just a few minutes on a thought and then writing up long and poorly structured sentences. When we ask for more details, we require more facts in the case interview or fit answer and this, crucially, usually means denser and shorter answers.

25 Nov 20126min

Populärt inom Business & ekonomi

framgangspodden
badfluence
varvet
uppgang-och-fall
rss-borsens-finest
rss-jossan-nina
rss-svart-marknad
avanzapodden
lastbilspodden
fill-or-kill
rss-dagen-med-di
rss-kort-lang-analyspodden-fran-di
borsmorgon
rss-inga-dumma-fragor-om-pengar
24fragor
kapitalet-en-podd-om-ekonomi
rikatillsammans-om-privatekonomi-rikedom-i-livet
rss-en-rik-historia
bathina-en-podcast
tabberaset