Appointment of Judicial Officers under the Bar quota: Judgement explainer

Appointment of Judicial Officers under the Bar quota: Judgement explainer

On 9 October, a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court unanimously held that judicial officers with seven years of prior Bar experience are eligible for recruitment as District Judges. The Court directed all states and High Courts to amend service rules within three months. The 139-page Judgement held that Article 233 is a complete code and rejected the idea of a fixed quota for practising advocates. It clarified that eligibility will rest on a combined seven years of Bar and/or judicial experience, with a minimum age of 35 years.

Avsnitt(120)

Representation of women in the legal profession

Representation of women in the legal profession

Did you know that Cornelia Sorabji from India became the first woman to pass the Civil Law examinations at Oxford? Despite passing the Bar, she was not allowed to plead before the Allahabad High Court...

25 Mars 20254min

Prosecutrix’s statement as testimony for conviction

Prosecutrix’s statement as testimony for conviction

Can a conviction stand on a single testimony? The Supreme Court recently reaffirmed that a prosecutrix's 'unshaken' testimony alone can secure a conviction, even without evidence of physical injury, i...

21 Mars 20254min

Interview | Gautam Bhatia in conversation with SCO about his new book

Interview | Gautam Bhatia in conversation with SCO about his new book

In our latest interview, Gautam Bhatia, author and advocate, sat down with Advay Vora, Assistant Editor, SCO to discuss his new book 'Indian Constitution: A Conversation with Power.' Bhatia spoke abou...

18 Mars 202541min

Interview | Justice Indira Banerjee, former judge of the Supreme Court of India

Interview | Justice Indira Banerjee, former judge of the Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Observer in conversation with Justice Indira Banerjee, former Judge, Supreme Court of India. Justice Banerjee was at the Supreme Court between 2018 to 2022. In this interview she shares ...

14 Mars 202525min

Sensitive work environment for women in the judiciary

Sensitive work environment for women in the judiciary

On 28 February, a bench led by Justice B.V. Nagarathna reinstated two women civil judges whose employment was terminated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The judgement emphasised the need to create a...

11 Mars 20255min

Gag orders and the Ranveer Allahbadia case

Gag orders and the Ranveer Allahbadia case

In our last newsletter, we examined the Supreme Court’s intervention in the Ranveer Allahbadia case. While a Division Bench granted the YouTuber interim relief, it strongly criticised his “disgusting”...

28 Feb 20254min

A split verdict in the Bastar Burial case

A split verdict in the Bastar Burial case

On 27 January, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and S.C. Sharma delivered a split verdict in Ramesh Baghel v State of Chattisgarh. The operative order in the ...

17 Feb 20254min

Will more judges help reduce the case backlog at the Supreme Court?

Will more judges help reduce the case backlog at the Supreme Court?

28 January 2025 marks 75 years since the inauguration of the Supreme Court. Since its inception, the sanctioned strength of the Court has been modified six times to reach 34 to combat the Court’s incr...

28 Jan 20254min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
svenska-fall
p3-krim
rss-krimstad
flashback-forever
spar
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-vad-fan-hande
aftonbladet-daily
motiv
politiken
rss-klubbland-en-podd-mest-om-frolunda
rss-aftonbladet-krim
grans
rss-krimreportrarna
olyckan-inifran
krimmagasinet
rss-flodet
rss-frandfors-horna
dagens-eko