Appointment of Judicial Officers under the Bar quota: Judgement explainer

Appointment of Judicial Officers under the Bar quota: Judgement explainer

On 9 October, a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court unanimously held that judicial officers with seven years of prior Bar experience are eligible for recruitment as District Judges. The Court directed all states and High Courts to amend service rules within three months. The 139-page Judgement held that Article 233 is a complete code and rejected the idea of a fixed quota for practising advocates. It clarified that eligibility will rest on a combined seven years of Bar and/or judicial experience, with a minimum age of 35 years.

Avsnitt(120)

Freedom of Speech and Constitutional Nostalgia

Freedom of Speech and Constitutional Nostalgia

As a part of our special series commemorating 75 years of the Supreme Court we look at one of the Supreme Court’s earliest landmark decisions. Arudra Burra's article, first published in Seminar magaz...

27 Nov 20242min

Top 7 dissents by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud

Top 7 dissents by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud

On 10 November, former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud retired after a 8 year long tenure at the Supreme Court. During this time, he authored over 600 judgements and was a part of over 1200 benches. ...

25 Nov 20246min

Union supremacy or state autonomy? | The industrial alcohol judgement

Union supremacy or state autonomy? | The industrial alcohol judgement

On 23 October 2024, the Supreme Court upheld state governments’ power to regulate industrial alcohol in an 8:1 majority. In her dissent, Justice B.V. Nagarathna expressed concern that with the major...

21 Nov 20244min

AMU minority status: Judgement Explained

AMU minority status: Judgement Explained

On 8 November, 7 judges of the Supreme Court overruled Azeez Basha v Union of India (1967) which held that Aligarh Muslim University did not have a minority status under Article 30 of the Constitution...

16 Nov 20247min

CJI D.Y. Chandrachud's top 10 judgements

CJI D.Y. Chandrachud's top 10 judgements

Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud retired from the Supreme Court on Sunday, 10 November, concluding an eight-year long tenure during which he authored over 600 judgements. In this video, we highlight 1...

15 Nov 20248min

“Public” or “private” interest litigation?

“Public” or “private” interest litigation?

In the late 1970s, the Supreme Court introduced the innovation of Public interest litigation. The idea was to improve the access of marginalised individuals and groups to the higher courts through pro...

26 Okt 20242min

Section 6A of the Citizenship Act: Judgement Explainer

Section 6A of the Citizenship Act: Judgement Explainer

Last week, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court upheld Section 6A of the Citizenship Act in a 4:1 majority. There were three opinions and multiple issues to consider. While the majority and the con...

24 Okt 20243min

Trial by Cinema

Trial by Cinema

In star-led commercial films, the courtroom has traditionally been presented as the hallowed ground that the wronged enter with innocent optimism. However, the Marathi-language film 'Court', has shed ...

19 Okt 20243min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
svenska-fall
p3-krim
rss-krimstad
flashback-forever
spar
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-vad-fan-hande
aftonbladet-daily
motiv
politiken
rss-klubbland-en-podd-mest-om-frolunda
rss-aftonbladet-krim
grans
rss-krimreportrarna
olyckan-inifran
krimmagasinet
rss-flodet
rss-frandfors-horna
dagens-eko