Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Episoder(1000)

Nigel Cawthorne And Decimates Andrew's Legal Strategy Against Virginia Robert's

Nigel Cawthorne And Decimates Andrew's Legal Strategy Against Virginia Robert's

Cawthorne blasted Andrew’s approach, arguing he was making the same mistakes Maxwell’s legal team made — attacking the credibility of the accuser, questioning memory, and casting the lawsuit as a mone...

1 Des 202522min

Virginia Roberts Vows To Destroy Prince Andrew In Court

Virginia Roberts Vows To Destroy Prince Andrew In Court

Virginia Giuffre publicly declared that she intended to push forward with her abuse case against Prince Andrew — not for a quiet settlement, but with the aim of full legal exposure. She said she was p...

1 Des 202527min

The  Shock That Followed The News That Andrew Would Accompany The Queen To Philips Memorial

The Shock That Followed The News That Andrew Would Accompany The Queen To Philips Memorial

When news broke that Prince Andrew would not only attend Prince Philip’s memorial service in March 2022, but would also accompany Queen Elizabeth II publicly and be photographed at her side, the react...

1 Des 202518min

How Disgraced Prince  Andrew Attempted To Build A Suit Of Armor Out Of Philanthropy

How Disgraced Prince Andrew Attempted To Build A Suit Of Armor Out Of Philanthropy

For years, Prince Andrew held dozens — some estimates put it around 200 — of charity patronages and official royal-charity affiliations. Through Prince Andrew Charitable Trust (PACT), and initiatives ...

30 Nov 202517min

The  Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's  Ties To Epstein (Part 4) (11/30/25)

The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 4) (11/30/25)

In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co...

30 Nov 202511min

The  Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's  Ties To Epstein (Part 3) (11/30/25)

The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 3) (11/30/25)

In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co...

30 Nov 202512min

The $200 Alibi: Epstein’s Dirtbag Defense Explained  (11/30/25)

The $200 Alibi: Epstein’s Dirtbag Defense Explained (11/30/25)

Jeffrey Epstein’s scheme to “pay” the girls he abused was never about compensation—it was a calculated legal shield designed by his attorneys to fabricate the appearance of consensual transactions. By...

30 Nov 202513min

Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein’s Immigration Scam (11/30/25)

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein’s Immigration Scam (11/30/25)

Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called “model visa” scheme was a carefully engineered system that used the glamour of the modeling industry as a cover to import and control young women, many from overseas. Recru...

30 Nov 202522min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden-usa
aftenpodden
stopp-verden
forklart
i-retten
popradet
det-store-bildet
fotballpodden-2
nokon-ma-ga
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-gukild-johaug
bt-dokumentar-2
aftenbla-bla
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk
rss-dannet-uten-piano
e24-podden