Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Episoder(1000)

The  Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's  Ties To Epstein (Part 3) (11/30/25)

The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 3) (11/30/25)

In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co...

30 Nov 202512min

The $200 Alibi: Epstein’s Dirtbag Defense Explained  (11/30/25)

The $200 Alibi: Epstein’s Dirtbag Defense Explained (11/30/25)

Jeffrey Epstein’s scheme to “pay” the girls he abused was never about compensation—it was a calculated legal shield designed by his attorneys to fabricate the appearance of consensual transactions. By...

30 Nov 202513min

Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein’s Immigration Scam (11/30/25)

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein’s Immigration Scam (11/30/25)

Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called “model visa” scheme was a carefully engineered system that used the glamour of the modeling industry as a cover to import and control young women, many from overseas. Recru...

30 Nov 202522min

Mega Edition:  The Legal Sledgehammer That Should Be Waiting for Ghislaine Maxwell If Pardoned (11/30/25)

Mega Edition: The Legal Sledgehammer That Should Be Waiting for Ghislaine Maxwell If Pardoned (11/30/25)

If Donald Trump were to issue a presidential pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell for her federal crimes, the doctrine of dual sovereignty could allow the state of New York to pursue separate charges against h...

30 Nov 202522min

Mega Edition:  How The Financial Sector Funded And Fortified  Jeffrey Epstein  (11/30/25)

Mega Edition: How The Financial Sector Funded And Fortified Jeffrey Epstein (11/30/25)

The financial sector didn’t just enable Jeffrey Epstein—they fortified him. For decades, elite institutions like JPMorgan Chase continued to do business with Epstein long after his 2008 conviction for...

30 Nov 202525min

Mega Edition:  Jane Doe's 1-6 And Their Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein's  Estate (11/30/25)

Mega Edition: Jane Doe's 1-6 And Their Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein's Estate (11/30/25)

The third amended complaint filed in the Southern District of New York involves six plaintiffs—Jane Does 1 through 6—who have brought claims against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, acting as co-...

30 Nov 202535min

Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell, The Public Corruption Unit And The "Hacked" Emails (11/29/25)

Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell, The Public Corruption Unit And The "Hacked" Emails (11/29/25)

Ghislaine Maxwell’s claims that her emails were hacked and manipulated to fabricate evidence against her appear to be a last-ditch attempt to rewrite history and cast doubt on overwhelming evidence of...

30 Nov 202536min

Former U.S. Intelligence Officer Allan Starkie Backs Up Andrew's No Sweat Claim

Former U.S. Intelligence Officer Allan Starkie Backs Up Andrew's No Sweat Claim

A former U.S. intelligence officer, Allan Starkie, publicly said he was willing to swear under oath that Prince Andrew really didn’t sweat — or at least appeared not to — on a night they spent togethe...

30 Nov 202529min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden-usa
aftenpodden
stopp-verden
forklart
i-retten
popradet
det-store-bildet
fotballpodden-2
nokon-ma-ga
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-gukild-johaug
bt-dokumentar-2
aftenbla-bla
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk
rss-dannet-uten-piano
e24-podden