Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Episoder(1000)

The Epstein Laundromat: How Dirty Cash Stayed Clean (12/5/25)

The Epstein Laundromat: How Dirty Cash Stayed Clean (12/5/25)

In the clearest possible terms, the financial network surrounding Jeffrey Epstein was not an accident, an anomaly, or the work of a lone predator—it was a deliberately constructed ecosystem enabled by...

5 Des 202513min

Andrew Lownie And His Interview With USA Today About Epstein And Andrew (12/5/25)

Andrew Lownie And His Interview With USA Today About Epstein And Andrew (12/5/25)

Lownie argues that Prince Andrew’s connection to Epstein was far deeper and longer-lasting than the prince has publicly admitted. According to Lownie, Andrew and his ex-wife met Epstein well before th...

5 Des 202516min

Follow the Money: Epstein’s Financial Empire Meets Congressional Oversight  (12/5/25)

Follow the Money: Epstein’s Financial Empire Meets Congressional Oversight (12/5/25)

Congress obtaining Jeffrey Epstein’s banking records marks one of the most significant breakthroughs in the long-delayed financial side of the investigation. After years of stonewalling, federal agenc...

5 Des 202511min

A Case Study in Hypocrisy: Dan Bongino and Epstein (12/5/25)

A Case Study in Hypocrisy: Dan Bongino and Epstein (12/5/25)

Dan Bongino has built an entire persona on being the tough-talking, truth-sniffing, deep-state-busting warrior who’s supposedly unafraid to charge into the darkest corners of American corruption. Yet ...

5 Des 202512min

Mega Edition:  The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 9-10) (12/5/25)

Mega Edition: The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 9-10) (12/5/25)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's argum...

5 Des 202522min

Mega Edition:  The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 7-8) (12/5/25)

Mega Edition: The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 7-8) (12/5/25)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's argum...

5 Des 202528min

Mega Edition:  The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 5-6) (12/4/25)

Mega Edition: The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 5-6) (12/4/25)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's argum...

5 Des 202529min

Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell And The Targeting Of The Most Vulnerable

Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell And The Targeting Of The Most Vulnerable

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell built an entire criminal enterprise on exploiting the most vulnerable — young girls who were isolated, struggling, or living through difficult circumstances that ...

5 Des 202527min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
i-retten
stopp-verden
forklart
popradet
nokon-ma-ga
dine-penger-pengeradet
det-store-bildet
fotballpodden-2
rss-gukild-johaug
aftenbla-bla
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
bt-dokumentar-2
e24-podden
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-dannet-uten-piano
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk