Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Episoder(1000)

Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motives Through the Lens of Trump Quid Pro Quo Allegations (12/4/25)

Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motives Through the Lens of Trump Quid Pro Quo Allegations (12/4/25)

Ghislaine Maxwell’s latest habeas corpus petition appears less a genuine attempt to overturn her conviction than a strategic maneuver aimed at slowing the release of potentially damaging records tied ...

4 Des 202513min

Ghislaine Maxwell’s Last Gambit: Inside the Habeas Corpus Play  (12/4/25)

Ghislaine Maxwell’s Last Gambit: Inside the Habeas Corpus Play (12/4/25)

Ghislaine Maxwell has initiated a habeas corpus petition in a last-ditch attempt to challenge her imprisonment, signaling a dramatic escalation in her ongoing legal fight. The filing reveals that Maxw...

4 Des 202511min

Trump’s Epstein Problem: The Myth Meets the Files  (12/3/25)

Trump’s Epstein Problem: The Myth Meets the Files (12/3/25)

Donald Trump has long attempted to minimize his association with Jeffrey Epstein, dismissing their ties as insignificant and framing himself as a political outsider willing to take on entrenched power...

4 Des 202512min

Mega Edition:  Disgraced Andrew  And The Alleged Backroom Plot To Keep Charles  Off Of The Throne (12/4/25)

Mega Edition: Disgraced Andrew And The Alleged Backroom Plot To Keep Charles Off Of The Throne (12/4/25)

For years, palace insiders whispered that Prince Andrew harbored ambitions far beyond his station and that he quietly maneuvered to keep Charles from ever reaching the throne. According to these rumor...

4 Des 202523min

Mega Edition:  The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 3-4) (12/3/25)

Mega Edition: The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 3-4) (12/3/25)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's argum...

4 Des 202527min

Mega Edition:  The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 1-2) (12/3/25)

Mega Edition: The United States And It's Response Brief To Maxwell's Motion For Appeal (Part 1-2) (12/3/25)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's argum...

4 Des 202524min

Jeffrey Epstein's Team Of Lawyers And Their Attempt To Hide The Worst Of His Crimes

Jeffrey Epstein's Team Of Lawyers And Their Attempt To Hide The Worst Of His Crimes

Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team spent years working to conceal the worst details of his crimes through aggressive legal maneuvering, intimidation tactics, and highly orchestrated settlements. They used c...

4 Des 202517min

Disgraced Prince Andrew And His Search For Legal Representation Against Virginia Roberts

Disgraced Prince Andrew And His Search For Legal Representation Against Virginia Roberts

After legal pressure mounted on Black for his close relationship with Epstein — including revelations that Black paid Epstein tens of millions of dollars for “tax and estate planning” even after Epste...

4 Des 202510min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
i-retten
stopp-verden
forklart
popradet
nokon-ma-ga
dine-penger-pengeradet
det-store-bildet
fotballpodden-2
rss-gukild-johaug
aftenbla-bla
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
bt-dokumentar-2
e24-podden
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-dannet-uten-piano
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk