Episode 9 - Prosecution Case Part 2 - Cross-Examination, The Power and Perils of Re-Examination

Episode 9 - Prosecution Case Part 2 - Cross-Examination, The Power and Perils of Re-Examination

The murder trial continues, with the prosecution witness Finn Hawkins facing cross-examination by barristers Gabriella Hadden (for Aidan Johnson), Henry Irwin (for Bianca Jones) and Ivy Jewell (for Conor Williams). In Episode 8 we looked in detail at the first stage of questioning a witness - examination-in-chief - which is the process of eliciting from a witness their account of what took place. But as we saw, there can often be a difference between what a witness says in their written witness statement, and what they actually say in court. And Finn Hawkins was no exception. In this episode, we move to the next stage of questioning - Cross-Examination. How does cross-examination really work? What are the key purposes of cross-examination, as well as the restrictions imposed in criminal cases? And why, sometimes, is less really more? We also discover the hidden power of the final stage of questioning - Re-Examination - and why both Henry Irwin and Ivy Jewell - on behalf of their clients Bianca and Conor - will have to tiptoe extremely carefully. And, as often arises in criminal cases, there is a surprise in store, a revelation which goes to the heart of the case against our three defendants, and the murder charge which they all face. As the case proceeds, we’ll find out that criminal cases can be far from a search for the truth. Thank you for listening. I very much hope that you enjoy this episode. NOTES Throughout this podcast I have referred to legislation, cases and to further information and reading. Please refer to the links in the Legal Notes below to access this information yourself. You will also find a list of the characters in this podcast below to help you. CHARACTERS Defendants - Aidan Johnson - (visually described at the scene as white, dark hair and a pink shirt) Bianca Jones - (visually described at the scene as white, slim, wearing a green top and with long dark hair) Conor Williams - (visually described at the scene as black, short hair, white t-shirt and stocky build) Prosecution Barrister - Keith Lowe Defence Barristers - Gabriella Hadden - representing Aidan Henry Irwin - representing Bianca Ivy Jewell - representing Conor Defence Solicitors - Georgina Hale - representing Aidan Holly Ibsen - representing Bianca Ramesh Jayanshankar - representing Conor The Deceased - Daniel Clarke - (visually described as having bright blond hair and dark clothing) Main Prosecution witnesses - Ethan Green (friend of Daniel Clarke) Finn Hawkins (friend of Daniel Clarke) LEGAL NOTES Cross-Examination - Part 2 C1 - rule C7 in the Bar Code of Conduct (Barristers - Not abusing your role as an advocate) https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/the-bsb-handbook.html?part=E3FF76D3-9538-4B97-94C02111664E5709&audience=&csrfToken=&q= s.41 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 - restrictions on asking complainant’s in cases involving allegations of a sexual nature questions about their sexual history except with the leave (permission) of the court https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/23/section/41 See also s.41 information from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/rape-and-sexual-offences-chapter-11-sexual-history-complainants-section-41-yjcea s.34 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 - prohibition on defendants in person cross-examining complaints in sexual cases https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/23/section/34 s.35 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 - prohibition on defendants in person cross-examining child complainants and other child witnesses https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/23/section/35 s.36 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 - Power of the court to prohibit in the interests of justice defendants in person cross-examining witnesses https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/23/section/36 A Life of Crime: The memoirs of a High Court Judge - Sir Harry Ognall. Published by William Collins. (Interesting insight into cross-examination in the Peter Sutcliffe trial). Recommended John Mortimer Books - A Voyage Round My Father (play) (Penguin Classics) Clinging to the Wreckage (Autobiography Part 1) (Penguin) Rumpole of the Bailey series (Penguin) ADDITIONAL READING - DEFENCE-BARRISTER.CO.UK For additional detailed reading on many aspects of what is covered throughout this series, please go to Defence-Barrister.co.uk https://www.defence-barrister.co.uk written by Chris Kessling, Criminal Barrister. PLEASE NOTE: It is a pleasure to hear from you and to answer your questions, but due to the matters set out below please understand that there are certain questions I am unable to respond to: Please bear in mind that this podcast is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. I am unable to provide legal advice on your specific case. If you require legal advice about a specific case or legal problem it is vital that you seek legal advice from a legal professional, such as a barrister or solicitor. Due to contempt of court provisions and other legal requirements, I am limited in what I can say about ongoing legal proceedings in any court. The story, all names, characters, and incidents portrayed in this podcast are fictitious. No identification with actual persons (living or deceased), places, buildings, and products is intended or should be inferred. Thank you for your understanding. CONTACT Email: podcast@defence-barrister.co.uk X https://twitter.com/defencebar Instagram https://www.instagram.com/defencebar/ COPYRIGHT Music and content created and recorded by Chris Kessling © 2024. All rights reserved. External links to (and provision of information from) .gov.uk websites, the sentencing council website (sentencingcouncil.org.uk), the Judiciary website (judiciary.uk) and other information subject to Crown copyright is provided under the terms of the open goverment licence - https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(27)

Series 2 Episode 11 - Appeals from the Magistrates’ Court - Conviction, Sentence, Case Stated and Judicial Review

Series 2 Episode 11 - Appeals from the Magistrates’ Court - Conviction, Sentence, Case Stated and Judicial Review

In this episode as we continue with appeals, we hear about how people who have had their case heard in the magistrates’ court can appeal against their conviction and sentence and what actually happens...

6 Nov 202440min

Series 2 Episode 10 - When the Prosecution Appeal - Unduly Lenient Sentences and Points of Law

Series 2 Episode 10 - When the Prosecution Appeal - Unduly Lenient Sentences and Points of Law

Content warning. This episode contains details (relevant to the legal issues being considered) of a case concerning the murder of a young woman in terrible circumstances which may cause distress to li...

30 Okt 202439min

Series 2 Episode 9 - Appeals after Pleading Guilty

Series 2 Episode 9 - Appeals after Pleading Guilty

Withdrawing a guilty plea and appeals following a plea of guilty. What do you do if you have pleaded guilty to a criminal offence, but now realise you were not in fact guilty? In this episode we find ...

22 Okt 202436min

Series 2 Episode 8 - Double Jeopardy and Wrongful Acquittals

Series 2 Episode 8 - Double Jeopardy and Wrongful Acquittals

Is there such a thing as an appeal against a verdict of Not Guilty? In this episode we look at the law on what is commonly known as double jeopardy, the idea (entrenched in law for many hundreds of ye...

15 Okt 202433min

Series 2 Episode 7 - The Appeal of Aidan Johnson

Series 2 Episode 7 - The Appeal of Aidan Johnson

In this episode we go to the Court of Appeal Criminal Division to hear the appeal of Aidan Johnson against his conviction for the murder of Daniel Clarke. Seeking to overturn the conviction on the gro...

8 Okt 202430min

Series 2 Episode 6 - How disclosure really works

Series 2 Episode 6 - How disclosure really works

In this episode, we take a deep dive into disclosure, that is how disclosure in criminal cases should actually work and why it is of vital importance in every criminal trial.  What do the rules actual...

1 Okt 202434min

Series 2 Episode 5 - When trials go wrong Part 2 - Identification, Science and Non-Disclosure

Series 2 Episode 5 - When trials go wrong Part 2 - Identification, Science and Non-Disclosure

Identification, science and non-disclosure as grounds of appeal in criminal cases Warning: this episode contains a criminal appeal case in which limited reference is made to sexual violence. Listener ...

24 Sep 202435min

Series 2 Episode 4 - When trials go wrong Part 1 - Grounds of appeal against conviction

Series 2 Episode 4 - When trials go wrong Part 1 - Grounds of appeal against conviction

Today we turn to grounds of appeal, i.e. the reasons why it is said that the jury's verdict is unsafe. And we look at a number of common grounds of appeal and the cases where they have been considered...

17 Sep 202440min

Populært innen True crime

krimpodden-vg
avhort
podme-krim
rss-avhort-aktuelt
krimarkivet-2
verdens-verste
rss-henlagt-andy-larsgaard
rss-svarttrost
rss-pa-innsiden-av-psychohoder
insiders
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
rss-domt-2
rss-domt-3
kriminalkrniken
rss-siktet
forsvinningsfredag-podkast
truecrimepodden-dokumentar
hold-pusten
truecrimepodden-2
rss-overste-etasje