#150 – Tom Davidson on how quickly AI could transform the world

#150 – Tom Davidson on how quickly AI could transform the world

It’s easy to dismiss alarming AI-related predictions when you don’t know where the numbers came from.

For example: what if we told you that within 15 years, it’s likely that we’ll see a 1,000x improvement in AI capabilities in a single year? And what if we then told you that those improvements would lead to explosive economic growth unlike anything humanity has seen before?

You might think, “Congratulations, you said a big number — but this kind of stuff seems crazy, so I’m going to keep scrolling through Twitter.”

But this 1,000x yearly improvement is a prediction based on *real economic models* created by today’s guest Tom Davidson, Senior Research Analyst at Open Philanthropy. By the end of the episode, you’ll either be able to point out specific flaws in his step-by-step reasoning, or have to at least consider the idea that the world is about to get — at a minimum — incredibly weird.

Links to learn more, summary and full transcript.

As a teaser, consider the following:

Developing artificial general intelligence (AGI) — AI that can do 100% of cognitive tasks at least as well as the best humans can — could very easily lead us to an unrecognisable world.

You might think having to train AI systems individually to do every conceivable cognitive task — one for diagnosing diseases, one for doing your taxes, one for teaching your kids, etc. — sounds implausible, or at least like it’ll take decades.

But Tom thinks we might not need to train AI to do every single job — we might just need to train it to do one: AI research.

And building AI capable of doing research and development might be a much easier task — especially given that the researchers training the AI are AI researchers themselves.

And once an AI system is as good at accelerating future AI progress as the best humans are today — and we can run billions of copies of it round the clock — it’s hard to make the case that we won’t achieve AGI very quickly.

To give you some perspective: 17 years ago we saw the launch of Twitter, the release of Al Gore's *An Inconvenient Truth*, and your first chance to play the Nintendo Wii.

Tom thinks that if we have AI that significantly accelerates AI R&D, then it’s hard to imagine not having AGI 17 years from now.

Wild.

Host Luisa Rodriguez gets Tom to walk us through his careful reports on the topic, and how he came up with these numbers, across a terrifying but fascinating three hours.

Luisa and Tom also discuss:

• How we might go from GPT-4 to AI disaster
• Tom’s journey from finding AI risk to be kind of scary to really scary
• Whether international cooperation or an anti-AI social movement can slow AI progress down
• Why it might take just a few years to go from pretty good AI to superhuman AI
• How quickly the number and quality of computer chips we’ve been using for AI have been increasing
• The pace of algorithmic progress
• What ants can teach us about AI
• And much more

Chapters:

  • Rob’s intro (00:00:00)
  • The interview begins (00:04:53)
  • How we might go from GPT-4 to disaster (00:13:50)
  • Explosive economic growth (00:24:15)
  • Are there any limits for AI scientists? (00:33:17)
  • This seems really crazy (00:44:16)
  • How is this going to go for humanity? (00:50:49)
  • Why AI won’t go the way of nuclear power (01:00:13)
  • Can we definitely not come up with an international treaty? (01:05:24)
  • How quickly we should expect AI to “take off” (01:08:41)
  • Tom’s report on AI takeoff speeds (01:22:28)
  • How quickly will we go from 20% to 100% of tasks being automated by AI systems? (01:28:34)
  • What percent of cognitive tasks AI can currently perform (01:34:27)
  • Compute (01:39:48)
  • Using effective compute to predict AI takeoff speeds (01:48:01)
  • How quickly effective compute might increase (02:00:59)
  • How quickly chips and algorithms might improve (02:12:31)
  • How to check whether large AI models have dangerous capabilities (02:21:22)
  • Reasons AI takeoff might take longer (02:28:39)
  • Why AI takeoff might be very fast (02:31:52)
  • Fast AI takeoff speeds probably means shorter AI timelines (02:34:44)
  • Going from human-level AI to superhuman AI (02:41:34)
  • Going from AGI to AI deployment (02:46:59)
  • Were these arguments ever far-fetched to Tom? (02:49:54)
  • What ants can teach us about AI (02:52:45)
  • Rob’s outro (03:00:32)


Producer: Keiran Harris
Audio mastering: Simon Monsour and Ben Cordell
Transcriptions: Katy Moore

Episoder(318)

#179 Classic episode – Randy Nesse on why evolution left us so vulnerable to depression and anxiety

#179 Classic episode – Randy Nesse on why evolution left us so vulnerable to depression and anxiety

Mental health problems like depression and anxiety affect enormous numbers of people and severely interfere with their lives. By contrast, we don’t see similar levels of physical ill health in young p...

3 Feb 2h 51min

Why 'Aligned AI' Would Still Kill Democracy | David Duvenaud, ex-Anthropic team lead

Why 'Aligned AI' Would Still Kill Democracy | David Duvenaud, ex-Anthropic team lead

Democracy might be a brief historical blip. That’s the unsettling thesis of a recent paper, which argues AI that can do all the work a human can do inevitably leads to the “gradual disempowerment” of ...

27 Jan 2h 31min

#145 Classic episode – Christopher Brown on why slavery abolition wasn't inevitable

#145 Classic episode – Christopher Brown on why slavery abolition wasn't inevitable

In many ways, humanity seems to have become more humane and inclusive over time. While there’s still a lot of progress to be made, campaigns to give people of different genders, races, sexualities, et...

20 Jan 2h 56min

#233 – James Smith on how to prevent a mirror life catastrophe

#233 – James Smith on how to prevent a mirror life catastrophe

When James Smith first heard about mirror bacteria, he was sceptical. But within two weeks, he’d dropped everything to work on it full time, considering it the worst biothreat that he’d seen described...

13 Jan 2h 9min

#144 Classic episode – Athena Aktipis on why cancer is a fundamental universal phenomena

#144 Classic episode – Athena Aktipis on why cancer is a fundamental universal phenomena

What’s the opposite of cancer? If you answered “cure,” “antidote,” or “antivenom” — you’ve obviously been reading the antonym section at www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/cancer.But today’s guest Athe...

9 Jan 3h 30min

#142 Classic episode – John McWhorter on why the optimal number of languages might be one, and other provocative claims about language

#142 Classic episode – John McWhorter on why the optimal number of languages might be one, and other provocative claims about language

John McWhorter is a linguistics professor at Columbia University specialising in research on creole languages. He's also a content-producing machine, never afraid to give his frank opinion on anything...

6 Jan 1h 35min

2025 Highlight-o-thon: Oops! All Bests

2025 Highlight-o-thon: Oops! All Bests

It’s that magical time of year once again — highlightapalooza! Stick around for one top bit from each episode we recorded this year, including:Kyle Fish explaining how Anthropic’s AI Claude descends i...

29 Des 20251h 40min

#232 – Andreas Mogensen on what we owe 'philosophical Vulcans' and unconscious beings

#232 – Andreas Mogensen on what we owe 'philosophical Vulcans' and unconscious beings

Most debates about the moral status of AI systems circle the same question: is there something that it feels like to be them? But what if that’s the wrong question to ask? Andreas Mogensen — a senior ...

19 Des 20252h 37min

Populært innen Fakta

fastlegen
dine-penger-pengeradet
relasjonspodden-med-dora-thorhallsdottir-kjersti-idem
treningspodden
foreldreradet
jakt-og-fiskepodden
dopet
merry-quizmas
podme-bio-3
rss-strid-de-norske-borgerkrigene
sinnsyn
rss-kull
sovnlos
gravid-uke-for-uke
rss-var-forste-kaffe
hverdagspsyken
fryktlos
rss-kunsten-a-leve
tomprat-med-gunnar-tjomlid
dypdykk