89: Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)

89: Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)

We chat with Tom about whether psychology has a conflict-of-interest problem and how to best define such conflicts. Links and other stuff we cover... Tom's article (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02041-5) on conflicts of interest in psychology How can we define a conflict an interest without falling down a rabbit hole? Communication statistics to the layperson How science journalism focuses on single studies rather than the larger story Tom’s new book: The AI does not hate you (https://www.amazon.com/Does-Not-Hate-You-Superintelligence-ebook/dp/B07K258VCV) Win Tom’s book! Tweet your favourite Hertz episode and we’ll pick one at random, who'll get sent Tom's book How do journalists go about hearing from new voices for story comments? What has Tom changes his mind about? Tom’s book recommendation: Galileo's Middle Finger (https://www.amazon.com/Galileos-Middle-Finger-Heretics-Activists/dp/0143108115) Other links - Dan on twitter (www.twitter.com/dsquintana) - James on twitter (www.twitter.com/jamesheathers) - Everything Hertz on twitter (www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) - Everything Hertz on Facebook (www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/) Music credits: Lee Rosevere (freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/) Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff! $1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes) Episode citation and permanent link Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, August 5) "Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/F9WBM (https://osf.io/f9wbm/) Special Guest: Tom Chivers.

Episoder(195)

179: Discovery vs. maintenance

179: Discovery vs. maintenance

Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources. Other things they cover: Should there be an annual l...

3 Apr 202448min

178: Alerting researchers about retractions

178: Alerting researchers about retractions

Dan and James discuss the Retractobot service, which emails authors about papers they've cited that have been retracted. What should authors do if they discover a paper they've cited has been retracte...

29 Feb 202449min

177: Plagiarism

177: Plagiarism

We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism ...

31 Jan 202442min

176: Tracking academic workloads

176: Tracking academic workloads

We chat about a paper on the invisible workload of open science and why academics are so bad at tracking their workloads. This episode was originally recorded in May 2023 in a hotel room just before o...

29 Des 202336min

175: Defending against the scientific dark arts

175: Defending against the scientific dark arts

We chat about a recent blogpost from Dorothy Bishop, in which she proposes a Master course that will provide training in fraud detection—what should such a course specifically teach and where would th...

7 Des 202338min

174: Smug missionaries with test tubes

174: Smug missionaries with test tubes

James proposes proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative opportunities for researchers from countries that are underrepresented in published research papers. We also tal...

1 Nov 202353min

173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?

173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psycho...

1 Okt 202335min

172: In defence of the discussion section

172: In defence of the discussion section

Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they'd like to get rid of from academic publishing. Links * The paper (https://doi.org/10.1007/s1122...

31 Aug 202335min

Populært innen Vitenskap

fastlegen
jss
tingenes-tilstand
forskningno
rekommandert
sinnsyn
rss-paradigmepodden
villmarksliv
liberal-halvtime
rss-nysgjerrige-norge
diagnose
fjellsportpodden
nevropodden
tomprat-med-gunnar-tjomlid
rss-inn-til-kjernen-med-sunniva-rose
tidlose-historier
kvinnehelsepodden
psykopoden
dekodet-2
smart-forklart