122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)
Everything Hertz21 Des 2020

122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)

The internet should have transformed science publishing, but it didn't. We chat with Michael Eisen (Editor-in-Chief of eLife (https://elifesciences.org/)) about reoptimizing scientific publishing and peer review for the internet age. Here what we cover and some links: How Michael co-founded PLOS (https://plos.org/) The book Dan mentioned on the history of the scientific journal (https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo28179042.html) Why did eLife launch? What did it offer that other journals didn't? Nature's recently proposed $11k article processing fee proposal eLife's new "author-driven publishing" approach (https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64910), in which all submitted papers have to be posted as preprints Part two of our conversation will be released on January 4, 2021 Other links - Dan on twitter (www.twitter.com/dsquintana) - James on twitter (www.twitter.com/jamesheathers) - Everything Hertz on twitter (www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) - Everything Hertz on Facebook (www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/) - Our merch store (https://everything-hertz-podcast.myteespring.co/), with mugs, shirts, hoodies + more Music credits: Lee Rosevere (freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/) Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff! One dollar a month: a twenty percent discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show - Five dollars a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month Episode citation Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 21) "122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/USYFC Special Guest: Michael Eisen.

Episoder(195)

163: eLife's new peer review model

163: eLife's new peer review model

Dan and James discuss eLife's new peer review model, in which they no longer make accept/reject decisions at the end of the peer-review process. Instead, papers invited for peer review will receive an...

7 Nov 202254min

162: Status bias in peer review

162: Status bias in peer review

We chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in peer-review, dodgy conference proceedings journals, and authorships for sale. Links * James' blogpost (https://...

17 Okt 202250min

161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)

161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)

Dan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science) to discuss the recent White House Office of Science Technology & Policy memo ensuring free, i...

12 Sep 202247min

160: Whistleblowing

160: Whistleblowing

Dan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct. The Safe Faculty Project (https://www.safefacultyproject.org/) website SLAPP statues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategiclawsu...

31 Aug 202250min

159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)

159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)

Dan and James are joined by Saloni Dattani for a chat about the history of peer review, a reimagination of what peer review could look like, what happens when you actually pay peer reviewers, peer re...

15 Aug 202251min

158: Word limits

158: Word limits

By popular demand, Dan and James chat about journal word and page limits.They also the debate around a recent meta-analysis on nudge interventions. Links * The PNAS nudge meta-analysis (https://doi.or...

1 Aug 202245min

157: Limitations

157: Limitations

Dan and James discuss a new preprint that examined the types of limitations authors discuss in their published articles and whether these limitation types has changed over the past decade, especially ...

11 Jul 202246min

156: Looking for seeders

156: Looking for seeders

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that concluded (again) that most researchers aren't compliant with their published data sharing statement and whether torrents (remember them?) are a viable altern...

21 Jun 202250min

Populært innen Vitenskap

fastlegen
rekommandert
jss
tingenes-tilstand
rss-rekommandert
liberal-halvtime
sinnsyn
forskningno
tomprat-med-gunnar-tjomlid
villmarksliv
rss-nysgjerrige-norge
fjellsportpodden
dekodet-2
kvinnehelsepodden
smart-forklart
rss-paradigmepodden
vett-og-vitenskap-med-gaute-einevoll
nevropodden
tidlose-historier
utenrikshospitalet