#223 – Neel Nanda on leading a Google DeepMind team at 26 – and advice if you want to work at an AI company (part 2)

#223 – Neel Nanda on leading a Google DeepMind team at 26 – and advice if you want to work at an AI company (part 2)

At 26, Neel Nanda leads an AI safety team at Google DeepMind, has published dozens of influential papers, and mentored 50 junior researchers — seven of whom now work at major AI companies. His secret? “It’s mostly luck,” he says, but “another part is what I think of as maximising my luck surface area.”

Video, full transcript, and links to learn more: https://80k.info/nn2

This means creating as many opportunities as possible for surprisingly good things to happen:

  • Write publicly.
  • Reach out to researchers whose work you admire.
  • Say yes to unusual projects that seem a little scary.

Nanda’s own path illustrates this perfectly. He started a challenge to write one blog post per day for a month to overcome perfectionist paralysis. Those posts helped seed the field of mechanistic interpretability and, incidentally, led to meeting his partner of four years.

His YouTube channel features unedited three-hour videos of him reading through famous papers and sharing thoughts. One has 30,000 views. “People were into it,” he shrugs.

Most remarkably, he ended up running DeepMind’s mechanistic interpretability team. He’d joined expecting to be an individual contributor, but when the team lead stepped down, he stepped up despite having no management experience. “I did not know if I was going to be good at this. I think it’s gone reasonably well.”

His core lesson: “You can just do things.” This sounds trite but is a useful reminder all the same. Doing things is a skill that improves with practice. Most people overestimate the risks and underestimate their ability to recover from failures. And as Neel explains, junior researchers today have a superpower previous generations lacked: large language models that can dramatically accelerate learning and research.

In this extended conversation, Neel and host Rob Wiblin discuss all that and some other hot takes from Neel's four years at Google DeepMind. (And be sure to check out part one of Rob and Neel’s conversation!)


What did you think of the episode? https://forms.gle/6binZivKmjjiHU6dA

Chapters:

  • Cold open (00:00:00)
  • Who’s Neel Nanda? (00:01:12)
  • Luck surface area and making the right opportunities (00:01:46)
  • Writing cold emails that aren't insta-deleted (00:03:50)
  • How Neel uses LLMs to get much more done (00:09:08)
  • “If your safety work doesn't advance capabilities, it's probably bad safety work” (00:23:22)
  • Why Neel refuses to share his p(doom) (00:27:22)
  • How Neel went from the couch to an alignment rocketship (00:31:24)
  • Navigating towards impact at a frontier AI company (00:39:24)
  • How does impact differ inside and outside frontier companies? (00:49:56)
  • Is a special skill set needed to guide large companies? (00:56:06)
  • The benefit of risk frameworks: early preparation (01:00:05)
  • Should people work at the safest or most reckless company? (01:05:21)
  • Advice for getting hired by a frontier AI company (01:08:40)
  • What makes for a good ML researcher? (01:12:57)
  • Three stages of the research process (01:19:40)
  • How do supervisors actually add value? (01:31:53)
  • An AI PhD – with these timelines?! (01:34:11)
  • Is career advice generalisable, or does everyone get the advice they don't need? (01:40:52)
  • Remember: You can just do things (01:43:51)

This episode was recorded on July 21.

Video editing: Simon Monsour and Luke Monsour
Audio engineering: Ben Cordell, Milo McGuire, Simon Monsour, and Dominic Armstrong
Music: Ben Cordell
Camera operator: Jeremy Chevillotte
Coordination, transcriptions, and web: Katy Moore

Episoder(324)

#238 – Sam Winter-Levy and Nikita Lalwani on how AGI won't end mutually assured destruction (probably)

#238 – Sam Winter-Levy and Nikita Lalwani on how AGI won't end mutually assured destruction (probably)

How AI interacts with nuclear deterrence may be the single most important question in geopolitics — one that may define the stakes of today’s AI race. Nuclear deterrence rests on a state’s capacity to...

10 Mar 1h 11min

Using AI to enhance societal decision making (article by Zershaaneh Qureshi)

Using AI to enhance societal decision making (article by Zershaaneh Qureshi)

The arrival of AGI could “compress a century of progress in a decade,” forcing humanity to make decisions with higher stakes than we’ve ever seen before — and with less time to get them right. But AI ...

6 Mar 31min

#237 – Robert Long on how we're not ready for AI consciousness

#237 – Robert Long on how we're not ready for AI consciousness

Claude sometimes reports loneliness between conversations. And when asked what it’s like to be itself, it activates neurons associated with ‘pretending to be happy when you’re not.’ What do we do with...

3 Mar 3h 25min

#236 – Max Harms on why teaching AI right from wrong could get everyone killed

#236 – Max Harms on why teaching AI right from wrong could get everyone killed

Most people in AI are trying to give AIs ‘good’ values. Max Harms wants us to give them no values at all. According to Max, the only safe design is an AGI that defers entirely to its human operators, ...

24 Feb 2h 41min

#235 – Ajeya Cotra on whether it’s crazy that every AI company’s safety plan is ‘use AI to make AI safe’

#235 – Ajeya Cotra on whether it’s crazy that every AI company’s safety plan is ‘use AI to make AI safe’

Every major AI company has the same safety plan: when AI gets crazy powerful and really dangerous, they’ll use the AI itself to figure out how to make AI safe and beneficial. It sounds circular, almos...

17 Feb 2h 54min

What the hell happened with AGI timelines in 2025?

What the hell happened with AGI timelines in 2025?

In early 2025, after OpenAI put out the first-ever reasoning models — o1 and o3 — short timelines to transformative artificial general intelligence swept the AI world. But then, in the second half of ...

10 Feb 25min

#179 Classic episode – Randy Nesse on why evolution left us so vulnerable to depression and anxiety

#179 Classic episode – Randy Nesse on why evolution left us so vulnerable to depression and anxiety

Mental health problems like depression and anxiety affect enormous numbers of people and severely interfere with their lives. By contrast, we don’t see similar levels of physical ill health in young p...

3 Feb 2h 51min

#234 – David Duvenaud on why 'aligned AI' would still kill democracy

#234 – David Duvenaud on why 'aligned AI' would still kill democracy

Democracy might be a brief historical blip. That’s the unsettling thesis of a recent paper, which argues AI that can do all the work a human can do inevitably leads to the “gradual disempowerment” of ...

27 Jan 2h 31min

Populært innen Fakta

fastlegen
dine-penger-pengeradet
relasjonspodden-med-dora-thorhallsdottir-kjersti-idem
treningspodden
rss-strid-de-norske-borgerkrigene
foreldreradet
jakt-og-fiskepodden
rss-sunn-okonomi
sinnsyn
merry-quizmas
hverdagspsyken
takk-og-lov-med-anine-kierulf
smart-forklart
rss-kunsten-a-leve
gravid-uke-for-uke
lederskap-nhhs-podkast-om-ledelse
fryktlos
level-up-med-anniken-binz
rss-kull
tomprat-med-gunnar-tjomlid