Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Disgraced Prince Andrew Braces For The Broadside Known As The Virginia Roberts Lawsuit

Disgraced Prince Andrew Braces For The Broadside Known As The Virginia Roberts Lawsuit

In the years leading up to Virginia Roberts (now Virginia Giuffre) filing her civil lawsuit against Prince Andrew in August 2021, a long history of allegations, legal filings, and public exposure set ...

10 Jan 22min

Judicial Watch And The Epstein Related FOIA

Judicial Watch And The Epstein Related FOIA

Judicial Watch’s Epstein-related lawsuit is primarily a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) action filed against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in late 2025, seeking the release of government reco...

10 Jan 13min

A Few Fast Facts About Sarah Kellen

A Few Fast Facts About Sarah Kellen

Sarah Kellen came into focus during the Epstein investigation as one of the key figures within Jeffrey Epstein’s inner circle who allegedly helped run and manage many logistics of his sex-trafficking ...

9 Jan 11min

Epstein Files Unsealed: Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 2) (1/9/26)

Epstein Files Unsealed: Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 2) (1/9/26)

In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure ra...

9 Jan 12min

Epstein Files Unsealed: Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 1) (1/9/26)

Epstein Files Unsealed: Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 1) (1/9/26)

In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure ra...

9 Jan 13min

The Epstein Failure That Makes Dan Bongino’s Tough Guy Act Ring Hollow (1/9/26)

The Epstein Failure That Makes Dan Bongino’s Tough Guy Act Ring Hollow (1/9/26)

Dan Bongino’s podcasting comeback is being sold like a heroic return, but it reads more like a retreat dressed up as defiance. For years, he built an audience by pounding the table about Epstein, corr...

9 Jan 12min

The Deal That Meant Nothing: How Epstein Violated His NPA With Zero Consequences (1/9/26)

The Deal That Meant Nothing: How Epstein Violated His NPA With Zero Consequences (1/9/26)

Jeffrey Epstein violated the 2008 non-prosecution agreement repeatedly and blatantly, and yet faced no consequences from the same system that claimed the deal was conditional. The NPA required Epstein...

9 Jan 10min

"We Don’t Trust the DOJ”: Inside the Push for a Special Master Over Epstein Records (1/9/26)

"We Don’t Trust the DOJ”: Inside the Push for a Special Master Over Epstein Records (1/9/26)

Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), the bipartisan sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, have formally asked a federal judge to appoint a special master or independent moni...

9 Jan 11min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

motiv
p3-krim
aftonbladet-krim
rss-krimstad
rss-viva-fotboll
flashback-forever
spar
svenska-fall
fordomspodden
aftonbladet-daily
rss-vad-fan-hande
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-krimreportrarna
olyckan-inifran
rss-frandfors-horna
svd-ledarredaktionen
rss-flodet
kungligt
krimmagasinet
rss-expressen-dok