Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Speaker Johnson Kills The Congressional Epstein Transparency Vote Until After The Recess

Speaker Johnson Kills The Congressional Epstein Transparency Vote Until After The Recess

Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision to halt a vote on the Epstein documents resolution until after the August recess reeks of calculated obstruction. After initially posturing as someone open to transpare...

21 Dec 202519min

The DOJ Asks The Supreme Court To Deny Ghislaine Maxwell's Appeal

The DOJ Asks The Supreme Court To Deny Ghislaine Maxwell's Appeal

The U.S. Department of Justice has strongly urged the Supreme Court to reject Ghislaine Maxwell’s petition, which seeks to overturn her 20‑year sex‑trafficking conviction by invoking the 2007 non‑pros...

20 Dec 202511min

Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 6) (12/20/25)

Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 6) (12/20/25)

The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to ...

20 Dec 202511min

Bill Clinton, Epstein, and the Collapse of a Carefully Managed Story   (12/20/25)

Bill Clinton, Epstein, and the Collapse of a Carefully Managed Story (12/20/25)

For years, the relationship between Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein was framed as trivial and incidental, a narrative reinforced through repeated denials and aggressive spin from Clinton’s defenders....

20 Dec 202513min

The Epstein Files Explained: What Was New, What Was Not, and Why It Matters (12/20/25)

The Epstein Files Explained: What Was New, What Was Not, and Why It Matters (12/20/25)

For years, expectations around the public release of the so-called Epstein files were deliberately inflated by commentators who framed them as a singular, revelatory moment. In reality, the release la...

20 Dec 202517min

In Their Own Words: Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia  Lawsuit  (Part 9-10) (12/20/25)

In Their Own Words: Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Lawsuit (Part 9-10) (12/20/25)

Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into...

20 Dec 202536min

In Their Own Words: Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia  Lawsuit  (Part 7-8) (12/20/25)

In Their Own Words: Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Lawsuit (Part 7-8) (12/20/25)

Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into...

20 Dec 202529min

In Their Own Words: Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia  Lawsuit  (Part 5-6) (12/20/25)

In Their Own Words: Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Lawsuit (Part 5-6) (12/20/25)

Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into...

20 Dec 202530min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

motiv
p3-krim
aftonbladet-krim
rss-krimstad
rss-viva-fotboll
flashback-forever
spar
svenska-fall
fordomspodden
aftonbladet-daily
rss-vad-fan-hande
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-krimreportrarna
olyckan-inifran
rss-frandfors-horna
svd-ledarredaktionen
rss-flodet
kungligt
krimmagasinet
rss-expressen-dok