Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Mega Edition:   Virginia Robert's Amended Reply To Ghislaine Maxwell's Discovery Motion (Part 1-2) (12/8/25)

Mega Edition: Virginia Robert's Amended Reply To Ghislaine Maxwell's Discovery Motion (Part 1-2) (12/8/25)

In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant per...

9 Dec 202526min

Denise George Accuses The Epstein  Estate Of Shielding Information

Denise George Accuses The Epstein Estate Of Shielding Information

Denise George, the former Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, sharply criticized the Epstein estate for what she described as deliberate secrecy designed to shield information and limit accou...

9 Dec 202531min

Jeffrey Epstein And The Odd Visits He Received While In Jail

Jeffrey Epstein And The Odd Visits He Received While In Jail

While Jeffrey Epstein was incarcerated in Florida following his 2008 state conviction, he maintained access to a stream of visitors that critics have long argued was wildly inappropriate given the nat...

9 Dec 202528min

Jeffrey Epstein's Estate And It's Alleged Transparency Problems

Jeffrey Epstein's Estate And It's Alleged Transparency Problems

Shortly after Jeffrey Epstein’s death in August 2019, he signed a will on August 9 bequeathing his estimated $577 million fortune into a trust known as the “1953 Trust.” Critics quickly raised concern...

9 Dec 202515min

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Tantrum That Never Ends

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Tantrum That Never Ends

Ghislaine Maxwell has attempted to cast her hair loss as yet another injury inflicted by incarceration, blaming the physical effects of prison while serving a sentence for facilitating the sexual abus...

8 Dec 202526min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3) (12/8/25)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 3) (12/8/25)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

8 Dec 202513min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2) (12/8/25)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 2) (12/8/25)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

8 Dec 202512min

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1) (12/8/25)

The Law According to DOJ: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" (Part 1) (12/8/25)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

8 Dec 202513min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
motiv
rss-krimstad
p3-krim
fordomspodden
flashback-forever
rss-viva-fotboll
spar
aftonbladet-daily
svenska-fall
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-vad-fan-hande
svd-dokumentara-berattelser-2
rss-krimreportrarna
rss-frandfors-horna
grans
olyckan-inifran
dagens-eko
kungligt
krimmagasinet