Supreme Court Roundup: June 12th Insights and New Cert Grants

Supreme Court Roundup: June 12th Insights and New Cert Grants

In this episode, we analyze the Supreme Court's recent activities across three key areas:

  • Six near unanimous decisions released on June 12th, 2025
  • Two major cases granted certiorari via June 16th, 2025 Order

In this episode, we analyze the Supreme Court's recent activities across three key areas:

  1. Term statistics and remaining docket overview
  2. Six decisions released on June 12th, 2025
  3. Two major cases granted certiorari via June 16th, 2025 Order

2024 Term Statistics

  • Total cases heard: 62 unique cases this term
  • Cases decided: 41 (approximately 66%)
  • Cases pending: 21 (approximately 33%)
  • Methodology: Consolidated cases counted once (e.g., Trump v. CASA/Washington/New Jersey)
  • Timing significance: June typically brings most consequential decisions

Key Observations from June 12th, 2025 Decisions

  1. Observation #1: Unanimity Reigned Supreme. June 12th consensus: 4 unanimous (9-0) decisions, 2 near-unanimous (8-1) decisions. Two-week pattern: 9 unanimous decisions and 3 8-1 splits out of 12 total case. Historical context: Must go back 15 opinions to find more than 2 dissents (May 22nd Oklahoma Charter School case). Full-term data: 29 of 41 decided cases unanimous or near-unanimous (71% consensus)
  2. Observation #2: Opinion Assignments Tell a Story. Recent distribution: 8 of 9 justices wrote majority opinions in past two weeks; Justice Kavanaugh who wrote sole opinion the week before)
  3. Observation #3: Speed Suggests Strategic Docket Management. Rapid turnaround: 6-10 weeks from oral argument to decision. Contrast with pending cases: U.S. v. Skrmetti (transgender medical care): 6+ months since December 4th argument; Hewitt v. United States (First Step Act): pending since January 13th; and Stanley v. City of Sanford (ADA): pending since January 13th.
  4. Observation #4: Uncle Sam Had a Bad Day. Government losses: 5 of 6 cases involved citizens vs. government agencies. Case types: FBI raid victims, disabled student vs. school district, veterans vs. benefits administration, prisoner vs. federal procedures, taxpayer vs. IRS. Pattern: Court prioritizing individual redress against institutional power. Only government win: Rivers v. Guerrero, which involved stricter habeas petition standards.
  5. Observation #5: The Court as Error Corrector. Reversal rate: 10 of 12 cases vacated or reversed (83%). Term comparison: Higher than overall 66% reversal rate. "Kick it back" approach: Court often vacates with instructions rather than final resolution
  6. Observation #6: Roberts' Perfect Record. Chief Justice pattern: 41 cases, 41 majority opinions joined. Zero concurrences, zero dissents. Contrast with other justices:Justice Thomas: 5 dissents, Justice Gorsuch: 4 dissents (including both June 12th dissents) and Justice Jackson: 3 dissents authored, 1 joined.

June 16th, 2025 Certiorari Grants

1. First Choice Women's Resource Centers v. Matthew Platkin | Case No. 24-781 | Docket Link: Here.

Question Presented: Where the subject of a state investigatory demand has established a reasonably objective chill of its First Amendment rights, is a federal court in a first-filed action deprived of jurisdiction because those rights must be adjudicated in state court?

Key Facts:

  • New Jersey Attorney General issued civil investigatory subpoena to faith-based pregnancy center
  • Subpoena sought donor identities, medical claims, operational practices
  • First Choice filed federal § 1983 lawsuit two days before compliance deadline
  • Complex parallel litigation in federal and state courts

Petitioner's Arguments:

  • Circuit split: Fifth Circuit bars pre-enforcement challenges vs. Ninth Circuit allows when showing objective chill
  • Concrete injury through chilling of First Amendment association/speech rights
  • § 1983 guarantees federal forum; state court requirement creates "preclusion trap"

Respondent's Arguments:

  • No circuit split—Third Circuit decision was fact-specific
  • Case presents unique procedural complications unsuitable for broad resolution
  • Claims too speculative under Article III ripeness doctrine

Stakes: Federal court access for constitutional challenges to state investigations

2. Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana | Case No. 24-813 | Docket Link: Here.

Questions Presented:

  1. Whether a causal-nexus or contractual direction test survives the 2011 amendment to the federal-officer removal statute
  2. Whether a federal contractor can remove to federal court when sued for oil-production activities undertaken to fulfill a federal oil-refinement contract

Key Facts:

  • Louisiana parishes sued oil companies for environmental harm from WWII-era crude oil production
  • Companies sought federal officer removal based on WWII contracts to supply high-octane aviation gasoline
  • Fifth Circuit found companies satisfied "acting under" requirement but failed "relating to" requirement
  • Majority required explicit contractual directive about challenged conduct

Petitioner's Arguments:

  • Fifth Circuit improperly required "explicit directive" in federal contracts
  • Circuit split on federal officer removal standards
  • Vertically integrated operations inherently connected crude production to federally-mandated refinement

Respondent's Arguments:

  • No circuit conflict—decision was fact-specific, unpublished
  • Federal crude oil allocation program "severed" connection by allowing open market purchases
  • Contracts contained no directives about extraction methods or locations

Stakes: Determines whether climate litigation stays in state court (plaintiff preference) or moves to federal court (defendant preference); potential impact on all pending climate cases

Support the Podcast

If you found this analysis helpful, please subscribe, rate, and share this podcast. Your support helps us continue providing in-depth Supreme Court coverage.

Timestamps

[00:00:00] Introduction

[00:00:23] Decision Tally

[00:01:25] 6-Pack of Observations: June 12th Opinions

[00:09:52] June 16 Order List

[00:10:26] Cert Grant: First Choice v. Platkin

[00:13:36] Cert Grant: Chevron v. Plaquemines

Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(500)

Opinion Summary: Monsanto v. Durnell | Court Axes Roundup Cancer Suits

Opinion Summary: Monsanto v. Durnell | Court Axes Roundup Cancer Suits

Monsanto Co. v. Durnell | Case No. 24-1068 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: April 27, 2026 | Decided: June 25, 2026Overview: Federal pesticide law blocks a Missouri cancer patient's failure-to-warn lawsu...

2 Juli 15min

Opinion Summary: Mullin v. Doe | No Judge. No TPS. No Way Back.

Opinion Summary: Mullin v. Doe | No Judge. No TPS. No Way Back.

Mullin, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, et al. v. Doe, et al. | No. 25-1083 (consolidated with Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Miot, et al., No. 25-1084) | Docket: Here | ...

1 Juli 16min

New Opinions: June 30th | 3 Blockbusters End the Term

New Opinions: June 30th | 3 Blockbusters End the Term

OVERVIEWThree opinions released June 30th, 2026 — the final day of the October 2025 Term — spanning birthright citizenship, transgender athletes in school sports, and political party campaign spending...

30 Juni 13min

Opinion Summary: Mullin v. Al Otro Lado | The Inch That Changed Immigration Law

Opinion Summary: Mullin v. Al Otro Lado | The Inch That Changed Immigration Law

Mullin, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. v. Al Otro Lado, et al. | Case No. 25-5 | Docket Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-5.html | Argu...

30 Juni 14min

New Opinions: June 29th |  Phones, the Fed, the FTC, and the Ballot Box

New Opinions: June 29th | Phones, the Fed, the FTC, and the Ballot Box

OVERVIEWFour opinions released June 29th, 2026 — one day, across digital privacy, presidential removal power at two federal agencies, and absentee ballot receipt deadlines.Two decisions split 6-3 alon...

29 Juni 18min

Opinion Summary: Wolford v. Lopez | Permission Slip Flopped

Opinion Summary: Wolford v. Lopez | Permission Slip Flopped

Wolford v. Lopez | Case No. 24-1046 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: January 20, 2026 | Decided: June 25, 2026Overview: After Bruen recognized the right to public carry, Hawaii required licensed gun carr...

29 Juni 13min

Opinion Summary: Blanche v. Lau | Seize Green Cards First and Prove Why Later

Opinion Summary: Blanche v. Lau | Seize Green Cards First and Prove Why Later

Blanche, Acting Attorney General v. Muk Choi Lau | Case No. 25-429 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: April 22, 2026 | Decided: June 23, 2026Overview: The Court addressed whether border officers must posse...

28 Juni 15min

Opinion Summary: Pung v. Isabella County | Small Debt, Tiny Check

Opinion Summary: Pung v. Isabella County | Small Debt, Tiny Check

Pung v. Isabella County | Case No. 25-95 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: 02/25/2026 | Decided: 06/23/2026Overview: A Michigan family lost their $194,400 home at a tax auction for $76,008 over a disputed...

27 Juni 19min

Populärt inom Business & ekonomi

framgangspodden
rss-jossan-nina
varvet
rss-borsens-finest
24fragor
badfluence
svd-tech-brief
avanzapodden
uppgang-och-fall
lastbilspodden
rss-inga-dumma-fragor-om-pengar
bathina-en-podcast
rikatillsammans-om-privatekonomi-rikedom-i-livet
fill-or-kill
rss-kort-lang-analyspodden-fran-di
kapitalet-en-podd-om-ekonomi
tabberaset
rss-hos-psykologen
rss-veckans-trade
rss-dagen-med-di