New Opinions: Breaking Down the Five June 23rd Opinions

New Opinions: Breaking Down the Five June 23rd Opinions

Overview:

  • Five opinions released June 23rd, 2026 — one day, across immigration, international human rights, foreign sovereign immunity, religious freedom, and property rights.
  • Four of five decisions split 6–3: identical conservative majority, identical liberal dissent, four consecutive times.
  • The fifth — a Michigan family's $2,241 tax bill and a home sold at auction for $76,008 — drew near-unanimous agreement across ideological lines.
  • Every conservative Justice authored a majority; Chief Justice Roberts joined all five without writing one.
  • Justice Jackson led all Justices in separate opinion output — three opinions across the five cases.
  • This episode breaks down all five decisions: authors, vote splits, key holdings, separate opinions, and real-world consequences.

Blanche, Acting Attorney General versus Lau | No. 25–429

  • Border officers need not hold clear and convincing evidence before treating a returning lawful permanent resident as an admission-seeker based on a crime involving moral turpitude.
  • 6–3. Justice Thomas authored the majority, joined by Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.
  • Justice Jackson dissented, joined by Sotomayor and Kagan.
  • Second Circuit vacated and remanded.

Cisco Systems, Inc. versus Doe | No. 24–856

  • Courts may not create new causes of action under the Alien Tort Statute; the Torture Victim Protection Act does not cover aiding-and-abetting liability.
  • 6–3. Justice Barrett authored the majority, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh.
  • Justice Jackson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Kagan.
  • Justice Sotomayor dissented, joined by Kagan and Jackson as to Parts I–III and V.
  • Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded.

Exxon Mobil Corp. versus Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba) | No. 24–699

  • The Helms-Burton Act itself abrogates the sovereign immunity of Cuban agencies and instrumentalities; plaintiffs need not separately satisfy FSIA exceptions.
  • 6–3. Justice Kavanaugh authored the majority, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett.
  • Justice Kagan dissented, joined by Sotomayor and Jackson.
  • D.C. Circuit reversed and remanded.

Landor versus Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety | No. 23–1197

  • Individual state prison officers may not face personal liability under RLUIPA unless they voluntarily and knowingly consented to answer suits under the statute.
  • 6–3. Justice Gorsuch authored the majority, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.
  • Justice Jackson dissented, joined by Sotomayor and Kagan.
  • Fifth Circuit affirmed.

Pung, Personal Representative of the Estate of Pung versus Isabella County, Michigan | No. 25–95

  • Just compensation following a tax sale equals the auction sale price, not the property's hypothetical fair market value; the Eighth Amendment Excessive Fines Clause claim fails.
  • Near-unanimous. Justice Alito authored the majority, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson, and by Thomas except as to Part II–B.
  • Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, joined by Gorsuch and Jackson.
  • Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, joined by Gorsuch except as to footnote 1.
  • Sixth Circuit vacated and remanded.

Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(500)

Opinion Summary: Monsanto v. Durnell | Court Axes Roundup Cancer Suits

Opinion Summary: Monsanto v. Durnell | Court Axes Roundup Cancer Suits

Monsanto Co. v. Durnell | Case No. 24-1068 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: April 27, 2026 | Decided: June 25, 2026Overview: Federal pesticide law blocks a Missouri cancer patient's failure-to-warn lawsu...

2 Juli 15min

Opinion Summary: Mullin v. Doe | No Judge. No TPS. No Way Back.

Opinion Summary: Mullin v. Doe | No Judge. No TPS. No Way Back.

Mullin, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, et al. v. Doe, et al. | No. 25-1083 (consolidated with Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Miot, et al., No. 25-1084) | Docket: Here | ...

1 Juli 16min

New Opinions: June 30th | 3 Blockbusters End the Term

New Opinions: June 30th | 3 Blockbusters End the Term

OVERVIEWThree opinions released June 30th, 2026 — the final day of the October 2025 Term — spanning birthright citizenship, transgender athletes in school sports, and political party campaign spending...

30 Juni 13min

Opinion Summary: Mullin v. Al Otro Lado | The Inch That Changed Immigration Law

Opinion Summary: Mullin v. Al Otro Lado | The Inch That Changed Immigration Law

Mullin, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. v. Al Otro Lado, et al. | Case No. 25-5 | Docket Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-5.html | Argu...

30 Juni 14min

New Opinions: June 29th |  Phones, the Fed, the FTC, and the Ballot Box

New Opinions: June 29th | Phones, the Fed, the FTC, and the Ballot Box

OVERVIEWFour opinions released June 29th, 2026 — one day, across digital privacy, presidential removal power at two federal agencies, and absentee ballot receipt deadlines.Two decisions split 6-3 alon...

29 Juni 18min

Opinion Summary: Wolford v. Lopez | Permission Slip Flopped

Opinion Summary: Wolford v. Lopez | Permission Slip Flopped

Wolford v. Lopez | Case No. 24-1046 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: January 20, 2026 | Decided: June 25, 2026Overview: After Bruen recognized the right to public carry, Hawaii required licensed gun carr...

29 Juni 13min

Opinion Summary: Blanche v. Lau | Seize Green Cards First and Prove Why Later

Opinion Summary: Blanche v. Lau | Seize Green Cards First and Prove Why Later

Blanche, Acting Attorney General v. Muk Choi Lau | Case No. 25-429 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: April 22, 2026 | Decided: June 23, 2026Overview: The Court addressed whether border officers must posse...

28 Juni 15min

Opinion Summary: Pung v. Isabella County | Small Debt, Tiny Check

Opinion Summary: Pung v. Isabella County | Small Debt, Tiny Check

Pung v. Isabella County | Case No. 25-95 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: 02/25/2026 | Decided: 06/23/2026Overview: A Michigan family lost their $194,400 home at a tax auction for $76,008 over a disputed...

27 Juni 19min

Populärt inom Business & ekonomi

framgangspodden
badfluence
rss-jossan-nina
varvet
dynastin
rss-borsens-finest
avanzapodden
uppgang-och-fall
borsmorgon
svd-tech-brief
rss-dagen-med-di
rss-kort-lang-analyspodden-fran-di
fill-or-kill
rss-inga-dumma-fragor-om-pengar
tabberaset
rss-hos-psykologen
lastbilspodden
rikatillsammans-om-privatekonomi-rikedom-i-livet
ekonomiekot-extra
rss-veckans-trade