Pamela Smart: Should She Get A New Trial?

Pamela Smart’s fate came down to a question that still hangs over the case: Who should the jury believe? In Part 2 of Pamela Smart: Should She Get A New Trial? Mystery & Murder: Analysis by Dr. Phil, Dr. Phil examines the testimony that helped convict Smart of conspiring to murder her husband, Gregg Smart. Billy Flynn and the other teenage participants testified against Pamela after receiving plea agreements, giving the defense a powerful argument: did they tell the truth, or tell prosecutors what they needed to hear to save themselves? Dr. Phil also analyzes the secretly recorded conversations with Cecelia Pierce and the disputed transcripts now at the center of Smart’s push for a new trial. Her attorneys argue jurors may have been psychologically primed to hear incriminating words that were not actually clear on the recordings a potential example of confirmation and expectation bias. Pamela Smart was ultimately convicted and sentenced to life without parole. More than 35 years later, the question remains: Was the evidence overwhelming—or could the jury have been influenced by what they were told to hear?

Sponsored by Preserve Gold: Get up to $20,000 in FREE Gold & Silver with a qualified purchase. Text ASKPHIL to 50505 or visit https://DrPhilgold.com

Sponsored by Chapter: Don’t wait! If you’re on Medicare or will be soon, reach out to Chapter: Call: (352)-845-0659 or go to https://askchapter.org to learn about your Medicare options and get help finding ways to save money.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.