The Groundbreaking Tort That Recognized Intimate Partner Violence w/ Joanna Radbord

The Groundbreaking Tort That Recognized Intimate Partner Violence w/ Joanna Radbord

For decades, family lawyers have represented clients whose abuse was not defined by one isolated incident, but by a pattern of control: financial abuse, isolation, humiliation, threats, physical violence, and the slow erosion of autonomy inside the home.

The problem was that tort law did not always know how to capture that kind of harm.

Claims like assault, battery, and intentional infliction of mental distress could address pieces of the abuse, but they often miss the cumulative reality of intimate partner violence: the breach of trust, the coercive control, and the loss of dignity, equality, safety, and freedom within what should have been a safe relationship.

That is what makes Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia so significant.

In recognizing the new tort of intimate partner violence, the Supreme Court of Canada gave family lawyers a framework for harm many clients had been describing for years, but the law had not fully named. The case confirms that intimate partner violence is not merely a series of discrete acts. It can be a pattern of coercive and controlling conduct that causes its own compensable harm.

In this episode, Areta is joined by Joanna Radbord, a partner at McCarthy Hansen & Company, who worked on Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia as co-counsel for the appellant before the Supreme Court of Canada. Joanna brings both direct involvement in the case and deep experience in novel family law litigation, constitutional challenges, and research on intimate partner violence. She unpacks why the existing torts were not enough, what this new tort changes for family lawyers and their clients, and why Ahluwalia marks a major shift in how the law recognizes intimate partner violence.

What you’ll discover in this episode:

How Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia created a new tort of intimate partner violence and why that recognition is significant for family law.

Why existing torts like assault, battery, and intentional infliction of mental distress often failed to capture the cumulative harm of coercive control.

The three-part test family lawyers now need to understand when assessing intimate partner violence claims.

What the new tort changes in practice, from screening and pleadings to damages, settlement strategy, and client safety.

Why this case matters for survivors whose harm has often been minimized, fragmented, or treated as incidental to the “real” family law issues.

Access your complimentary copy of the exclusive resource guide provided by Joanna Radbord. Click the link below for an instant download.

A Primer on the Tort of Intimate Partner Violence

About the Guest

Joanna Radbord is a partner at McCarthy Hansen & Company LLP. Joanna has practiced for over a quarter-century, seeking to advance access to family justice through litigation, intervention, law reform, and education. Joanna was awarded the Law Society Medal for exceptional career achievements and contributions to her community in the areas of LGBTQ2+ rights, family law, constitutional, and human rights. She received the Lexpert Zenith Award: Celebrating Women in Law and the Canadian Bar Association Sexual Orientation and CBA Gender Identity Conference Hero Award. Joanna has done ground-breaking work on substantive equality and access to justice, including litigation to achieve spousal status for same-sex couples (M v H), equal marriage (Halpern), trans parenting (Forrester), birth registration (Rutherford), three-parent recognition (AA v BB), and defining parentage (Grand). In relation to Indigenous families, Joanna’s work has addressed jurisdiction over Haudenosaunee family law disputes (Beaver v Hill) and the best interests of Indigenous children in parenting cases (E.Y. v B.A.). She is currently co-counsel in litigation seeking recognition of the tort of family violence before the Supreme Court of Canada (Ahluwalia). Connect with Joanna on LinkedIn.

About Your Host

Areta Lloyd practices estate and trusts litigation, with a particular focus on capacity litigation. She participates in public speaking, mentors junior lawyers, and presents courses on estates law, health law, and law practice management. Areta has written for several publications and wrote a column for the Alzheimer caregiver website ALZlive.com.

Resources

Have a suggestion for a great case to feature on the show? Email me at hello@onegreatcase.com

Looking for support in your legal career? The Toronto Lawyers Association offers resources, networking, and legal research at no cost. Visit https://www.tlaonline.ca/

Access your complimentary copy of the exclusive resource guide provided by Joanna Radbord. Click the link below for an instant download.

A Primer on the Tort of Intimate Partner Violence

Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(13)

The Prolific Decision on Privacy in Sexual Assault Cases w/Anna Matas

The Prolific Decision on Privacy in Sexual Assault Cases w/Anna Matas

How much privacy is too much? The Court of Appeal recently granted a motion, in part, that will be the standard for sexual assault cases, using the Sherman Estate framework. The implications are espec...

24 Sep 40min

Can Historic Family Law Obligations Continue to Have Consequences After Death?

Can Historic Family Law Obligations Continue to Have Consequences After Death?

Can historic family law obligations continue to have consequences after death through Part V of the Succession Law Reform Act?A recent case touched on that question, causing a stir in the estates liti...

3 Sep 33min

The Dog Walker Who Was Attacked and Legally Treated as the Owner w/ Shane Katz

The Dog Walker Who Was Attacked and Legally Treated as the Owner w/ Shane Katz

What happens when the law defines a dog owner more broadly than most people realize?Under Ontario’s Dog Owners’ Liability Act, a person may be treated as a dog’s owner simply because they have tempora...

30 Juli 23min

When Online Trolls Target a Community: How the Law Responds w/ Doug Judson

When Online Trolls Target a Community: How the Law Responds w/ Doug Judson

On paper, defamation law looks simple: a false statement is published, a reputation is harmed, and the courts step in to address the damage.The internet has changed that equation.Today, some of the mo...

26 Mars 29min

Chiang (Trustee of) v. Chiang: The Dark Side of Civil Contempt w/ Tom Curry

Chiang (Trustee of) v. Chiang: The Dark Side of Civil Contempt w/ Tom Curry

We like to believe that contempt of court is simple: you break the rules, face the consequences, and if you comply, you earn your way back out. The law, we tell ourselves, is precise, structured, and ...

5 Feb 55min

Nuremberg Revisited: When Evil Was Obvious but the Law Wasn’t w/ David Parry

Nuremberg Revisited: When Evil Was Obvious but the Law Wasn’t w/ David Parry

We tend to think of history’s great atrocities as moral failures that are obvious in hindsight. Evil acts, evil people, and clear lines between right and wrong.But the harder question (which still hau...

22 Jan 43min

Ritualistic Repetition or Genuine Intent? Inside a Stunning Undue Influence Case w/ David Delagran & Justice Gilmore

Ritualistic Repetition or Genuine Intent? Inside a Stunning Undue Influence Case w/ David Delagran & Justice Gilmore

Most people imagine undue influence as overt manipulation: a domineering child, a vulnerable parent, and a will that suddenly changes. But the reality, undue influence often looks like routine caregiv...

11 Dec 202536min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

svenska-fall
aftonbladet-krim
fordomspodden
p3-krim
rss-krimstad
flashback-forever
aftonbladet-daily
spar
rss-vad-fan-hande
svd-ledarredaktionen
de-fyras-gang
politiken
rss-expressen-dok
rss-krimreportrarna
omni-podd
rss-sanning-konsekvens
en-runda-till
motiv
rss-flodet
kungligt