#55 - Risk Salience and Unconscious Bias in Decision Making, with Hilary Evans Cameron
Borderlines27 Maj 2021

#55 - Risk Salience and Unconscious Bias in Decision Making, with Hilary Evans Cameron

Hilary Evans Cameron is an Assistant Professor at Ryerson Law. Prior to become a faculty member, Hilary represented refugee claimants for a decade. She is the author of Refugee Law’s Fact-finding Crisis: Truth, Risk, and the Wrong Mistake. Her paper on risk salience in refugee decisions that we discuss can be found here. She is also the creator of www.meetgary.ca, a website which provides guidance to both decision makers and asylum claimants on the implicit biases and thought processes that can influence decision makers. She provides training to the Immigration and Refugee Board on this topic. 3:00The two strong pulls in the law of how a decision maker should make a decision in a refugee hearing that impacts risk salience. 7:00Can a decision maker ever be truly neutral? 11:00Does the fact that the refugee process starts with a removal order “set things up” for strict scrutiny? Plus how politicians can influence error preference. 18:30Refugee acceptance rates have increased recently. Is this a result of new decision makers or the same decision makers applying different maxims. Can someone’s risk salience approach change over time? 22:00The non legal things that can influence decision makers. 26:30Studies on accuracy in credibility and how risk salience follows. 30:00Should decision makers make their biases explicit? 36:30What is the fear that people have of refugee claimants? 43:01The illusion of transparency. “The idea that truth will shine through.” 44:30The myth that a memory is like a video recording. 46:00The myth that a refugee claimant will never take unnecessary risks. 47:15The myth of once a liar always a liar.48:80The maxim of the perfect applicant. 52:00The maxim of “our expectations were clear.” 1:01The inconsistency between standards in refugee law and trauma theory. 1:04Hillary’s working with the IRB1:15Have any IRB members told Hillary that who the representative is can impact how they view the claim? 1:21When should you admit a past lie?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(227)

#217 - Duress and Criminal Inadmissibility: A Major Federal Court of Appeal Decision

#217 - Duress and Criminal Inadmissibility: A Major Federal Court of Appeal Decision

We break down a major new Federal Court of Appeal decision on criminal inadmissibility, duress, and refugee protection in Canadian immigration law. The case is Rodriguez Anzola v. Canada (Citizenship ...

20 Maj 51min

#216 - Inside IRCC: Answers to Representatives’ Emails #1

#216 - Inside IRCC: Answers to Representatives’ Emails #1

Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff review several responses from IRCC’s Immigration Representatives’ Mailbox, where immigration representatives ask questions about how Canadian immigration law an...

11 Maj 1h 1min

#215 - The 2025 CSIS Report: Security Screening, Impact of Mandamus on CSIS, and Backlogs

#215 - The 2025 CSIS Report: Security Screening, Impact of Mandamus on CSIS, and Backlogs

We take a look at the newly released 2025 report from Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), and what it tells us about immigration security screening in Canada.CSIS reports that it received 4...

6 Maj 23min

#214 - Auditor General Report Exposes Major Issues in Canada’s International Student Program

#214 - Auditor General Report Exposes Major Issues in Canada’s International Student Program

Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff break down the explosive findings from the Office of the Auditor General of Canada on Canada’s report on the international student program.Topics discussed incl...

28 Apr 53min

#213 - Race, Detention, and Transparency in Canada's Immigration System

#213 - Race, Detention, and Transparency in Canada's Immigration System

We explore one of the most complex and under-examined areas of Canadian immigration law: immigration detention—and the role that race and systemic bias may play within it.Topics discussed include the ...

24 Apr 46min

#212 - IRCC's Express Entry Changes and Consultations

#212 - IRCC's Express Entry Changes and Consultations

In this episode of the Borderlines Podcast, Amandeep Hayer and Steven Meurrens break down the latest Express Entry reforms under consideration by IRCC, and what they could mean for applicants, lawyers...

15 Apr 53min

#211 - Security Screening for Transnational Repression, with Retired CSIS Analyst Phil Gurski

#211 - Security Screening for Transnational Repression, with Retired CSIS Analyst Phil Gurski

Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff are again joined by retired CSIS analyst Phil Gurski, this time to unpack the growing issue of transnational repression in Canada.Drawing on Phil’s recent repor...

7 Apr 58min

#210 - Would You Pass the Citizenship Test?

#210 - Would You Pass the Citizenship Test?

In this lighter episode of Borderlines, we take a break from the usual deep dives into immigration law to tackle something every new Canadian faces: the citizenship test.We start with a quick overview...

31 Mars 35min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

motiv
svenska-fall
aftonbladet-krim
p3-krim
aftonbladet-daily
flashback-forever
politiken
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-krimreportrarna
rss-vad-fan-hande
rss-flodet
rss-krimstad
spar
rss-frandfors-horna
grans
krimmagasinet
svd-ledarredaktionen
spotlight
dagens-eko
blenda-2