Kaze - Breaking Around

Click here for the feeder sound II OPEN CALL voting poll, available between 12th of May – 12th of June: www.feeder.ro/2020/05/09/vote-feeder-sound-open-call/ WINNERS announcement - 15th of June --- Kaze - breaking around Set description: I could say that my musical ear evolves from month to month, but as a base I have and I will always have an affinity for breakbeats, which is also observed in my sets. This set contains predominantly "broken" rhythms but also 4/4 rhythms each being based on a subtle dark groove and strong percussion. The built atmosphere is based on details and aims to go through some interior states. About Kaze Artist biography: The violent passing through the congregation of musical styles, the discoveries which involved a diversity of genres along the journey and choosing as a final decision the electronic music, have all contributed to his development as an individual. Obsessed with the linear and profound thinking, he is effortlessly drifting away in the endless waves of color the minimalistic sound has to offer. Portfolio link: https://www.facebook.com/kazeest/ | @kattonero Current city: Bucharest, Romania 🇷🇴 3 releases you enjoy the most: Christopher Ledger – Deceptive (AMP021); Amorf – Momentum (AMP019); U.A ODE – #FF0099 B (ODE399W) 3 Romanian artists you follow: Vid, Dot13, Dragomir. 3 international artists you follow: Alexander Skancke., Claro Intelecto, Plant43. Most played album: I am listening a lot of new/old music and different genres like electro/deep/break/minimal so I don t have yet a most played one but for sure the last EP from Salmanzar was a little bit overplayed among that month (Salmanzar-Objects EP.)[JOULE009]. --- The feeder sound II project is organized by Save or Cancel team, composed of Cristina Popa (random) and Andrei Racovițan (ubic), through feeder.ro and is co-funded by AFCN, Thematic area: Digital art and new media. The program does not necessarily represent the position of the National Cultural Fund Administration. AFCN is not responsible for the content of the program or the way the program results can be used. These are entirely the responsibility of the beneficiary of the funding.