Section Three Goes to Washington

Section Three Goes to Washington

The months of discussion of Section Three on Amarica's Constitution now make their way to Washington, as cert has been granted in Trump v. Anderson. Amicus briefs will pour in - including the brothers Amar's brief. We present some of the approach the brief will take, and we look at the nine Justices, taking account of their jurisprudential history and styles, and discuss how an intellectually honest brief-writer can make their best arguments even better by considering how their readers will read them, and what might be most useful to provide to those readers. It's not quite "handicapping" but it is insightful, as all America is wondering if this case might actually result in the removal of Donald Trump from Colorado's primary ballot, and eventually possibly more states' ballots as well. It has come to this.

Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(293)

An Amendment Like Some Others - Special Guest Vikram D. Amar

An Amendment Like Some Others - Special Guest Vikram D. Amar

Voting rights are in the news.  The state and federal governments have sought to weigh in and intervene on election laws, as we have seen in previous cycles.  This time, a number of states have passed...

26 Aug 1h 21min

Preclearing the President

Preclearing the President

What happens when the president loses in court, even at the Supreme Court, but repeatedly attempts to fight the battle again?  New tariffs are offered after the old ones are thrown out.  Birthright ci...

19 Aug 1h 14min

There You Go Again

There You Go Again

The President did not file for reconsideration of the Court’s decision in Trump v. Barbara, but the President nevertheless doesn’t let the Constitution rest, issuing two new executive orders that purp...

12 Aug 1h 8min

Dobbs and Bruen Plus Time

Dobbs and Bruen Plus Time

As we make our way through the 20 most constitutionally significant cases of the Roberts court, this episode takes us through two cases that have continued to have resonance with the American people a...

5 Aug 1h 19min

Faces of Intratextualism

Faces of Intratextualism

We continue our survey of the Roberts Court’s oeuvre of constitutional cases, with particular emphasis on the series of cases that concerned making rules for voting and for voting districts.  These ca...

29 Juli 1h 23min

The Surprising Score

The Surprising Score

The SCOTUS term is behind us, and we take a look back - not just at this term, but at the entirety of the Roberts Court.  What are the most important constitutional cases of its time?  Where do the ju...

23 Juli 1h 22min

Dissenting from the Dissents

Dissenting from the Dissents

How could the vote in Trump v. Barbara have been as close as it was?  Many have been bewildered by the vote in this case, given the strength of the arguments in Chief Justice Roberts' majority opinion...

16 Juli 1h 26min

Unitary Duality - Guests Steven Calabresi and Vikram Amar

Unitary Duality - Guests Steven Calabresi and Vikram Amar

he Supreme Court ruled in two cases framing Unitary Executive theory.  So it’s entirely appropriate that we have two great experts on the topic joining us.  Steve Calabresi literally wrote the book on...

8 Juli 1h 30min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
aftonbladet-daily
p3-krim
en-runda-till
rss-krimstad
flashback-forever
politiken
svenska-fall
rss-expressen-dok
rss-krimreportrarna
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-vad-fan-hande
motiv
svd-ledarredaktionen
rss-frandfors-horna
rss-flodet
spar
fordomspodden
krimmagasinet
rss-aftonbladet-krim