What the Oral Argument Should Have Said

What the Oral Argument Should Have Said

EARLY UPLOAD - The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson on Thursday, and we were so alarmed by the errant direction they took that we decided to take to the air early. Here are key clips from the argument dissected - exposed, really - to reveal the mistaken representations of the meaning of certain cases; the ignoring of key facts which then distort others; the absence of key lines of argument; and the danger that the Court may be headed for another debacle on the scale of Bush v. Gore. Professor Amar “slows everything down” so the sometimes subtle misdirection that a fast-paced oral argument can induce is neutralized, creating clarity that we can only hope some Justice or some clerk sees in time. This episode is posted 4 days early for this reason, and next week’s will follow later this week as well. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com beginning Monday, February 12.

Det här avsnittet är hämtat från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Det kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(280)

Unrehearsed Answers

Unrehearsed Answers

It’s time for listener questions, and no surprise that current events are on everyone’s mind.  We range from the supposed weaponization slush fund, to pardons;  illegal military orders; simultaneous o...

27 Maj 0s

Scrip for Scripture on the National Mall

Scrip for Scripture on the National Mall

After weeks of tracing the background history and constitutional principles at work on religious establishment, free exercise, and equality issues, the Administration on cue sponsors, holds, staffs, a...

20 Maj 1h 22min

JFK's Wall

JFK's Wall

Our journey through the centuries of religious practice, attitudes, and constitutionalism has reached the 20th century, when several presidential elections set mileposts for the American religious deb...

13 Maj 1h 13min

Fourteen Colonies, Ten Commandments

Fourteen Colonies, Ten Commandments

As the 10 commandments case makes its way towards the Supreme Court, we add another chapter to our study of the historical events and factors that went into the American constitutional tradition when ...

6 Maj 1h 35min

Remember the Alamo Heights

Remember the Alamo Heights

We continue to trace the historical origins of the constitution’s approach to religion in American government and American life.  We take you on a tour around Europe at the time of the Reformation and...

29 Apr 1h 40min

Popes and Presidents

Popes and Presidents

The President has picked a fight with the Bishop of Rome, Pope Leo X.  Putting aside some of the distasteful elements of language and hubris, we ask where this fits in with notions of church and state...

23 Apr 1h 35min

Last Branch Stands, The Barbara Court Sits - Special Guest Sarah Isgur

Last Branch Stands, The Barbara Court Sits - Special Guest Sarah Isgur

This week it’s Attorney Cecilia Wang’s turn, as she appears before the Supreme Court to defend birthright citizenship in the Trump v. Barbara case, and we continue to analyze clips of the oral argumen...

15 Apr 1h 42min

New World, Same Constitution

New World, Same Constitution

Trump v. Barbara - the birthright citizenship case - reaches the Supreme Court, and we are there.  Akhil and Andy are at the oral argument, and immediately afterwards we stand outside the courthouse a...

8 Apr 2h 6min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

svenska-fall
motiv
aftonbladet-krim
p3-krim
spar
aftonbladet-daily
flashback-forever
rss-sanning-konsekvens
politiken
rss-krimreportrarna
rss-vad-fan-hande
rss-flodet
rss-frandfors-horna
olyckan-inifran
rss-aftonbladet-krim
grans
rss-krimstad
kungligt
dagens-eko
rss-expressen-dok