Speaker Johnson Kills The Congressional Epstein Transparency Vote Until After The Recess (7/22/25)

Speaker Johnson Kills The Congressional Epstein Transparency Vote Until After The Recess (7/22/25)

Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision to halt a vote on the Epstein documents resolution until after the August recess reeks of calculated obstruction. After initially posturing as someone open to transparency, Johnson pulled the plug the moment bipartisan momentum began building. His excuse—that Republicans should allow the administration space to act—is a transparent smokescreen. What he really did was take the one mechanism Congress had to demand accountability and neutralize it with a procedural timeout, shielding powerful interests from public scrutiny under the guise of calendar logistics.

This wasn’t about timing—it was about shielding. With bipartisan pressure mounting and the public overwhelmingly demanding the release of Epstein’s records, Johnson didn’t just pump the brakes—he pulled the entire emergency lever. Rather than allow a debate that might force uncomfortable truths into the light, he chose to grind the House to a halt. He suspended votes, sidelined committees, and essentially shut the door on any chance of real legislative movement.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Johnson shuts door on House vote before September on releasing Epstein files | CNN Politics



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

Prince Andrew Gets Caught In Another Epstein Related Tall Tale

Prince Andrew Gets Caught In Another Epstein Related Tall Tale

Prince Andrew's continued contact with Jeffrey Epstein long after the disgraced financier's conviction exposes a troubling pattern of dishonesty and poor judgment. Despite his public claims that he severed ties in 2010, newly surfaced emails show that he remained in touch at least until February 2011, casting doubt on his past denials. This revelation further erodes his already damaged credibility and raises serious questions about his willingness to mislead the public and authorities. If he had nothing to hide, why did he attempt to obscure the true extent of his relationship with Epstein? His actions suggest either reckless naivety or a deeper entanglement that he has yet to fully disclose.More disturbing is Prince Andrew’s refusal to acknowledge the implications of his continued association with a convicted sex offender. Rather than taking responsibility, he has evaded scrutiny, avoided cooperating with U.S. authorities, and relied on royal privilege to shield himself from accountability. The latest revelations should serve as a wake-up call that his attempt to distance himself from Epstein is nothing more than a carefully crafted illusion. His repeated missteps, from his disastrous BBC interview to these newly exposed communications, indicate a man more concerned with self-preservation than with transparency. If there is truly nothing more to hide, he should stop stonewalling and submit himself to a full investigation—anything less only deepens the suspicion surrounding his involvement.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prince Andrew is spotted riding his horse at Windsor as court documents reveal he emailed paedo financier Jeffrey Epstein 'we'll play more soon' - two months after he claimed he had cut him off in Newsnight interview | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

24 Juli 13min

Jeffrey Epstein And The Townhouse He Rented From The State Department

Jeffrey Epstein And The Townhouse He Rented From The State Department

In the early 1990s, specifically from 1992 to 1995, Jeffrey Epstein leased a former Iranian diplomatic townhouse at 34 East 69th Street in Manhattan—property that the U.S. State Department had taken over after diplomatic relations with Iran ended. He paid $15,000 per month for the lease, and at some point sublet it to attorney Ivan Fisher and others. The State Department later sued Epstein, alleging he had violated the lease terms by subletting without permission and failed to make proper rent payments, ultimately seeking to evict him.This arrangement has drawn attention because, at the same time Epstein was building his reputation as a financial advisor and philanthropist, he leveraged government-leased real estate to house his associates. The legal case underscores a pattern of Epstein navigating institutional systems—from government leases to elite circles—often stretching or disregarding the rules while maintaining a facade of legitimacy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosiegray/jeffrey-epstein-state-departmentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

24 Juli 14min

Jeffrey Epstein And His Invitation To Sit In At A Scientific American Editorial Meeting

Jeffrey Epstein And His Invitation To Sit In At A Scientific American Editorial Meeting

In September 2014, internal emails revealed that Jeffrey Epstein was invited to sit in on editorial meetings at Scientific American, one of the most respected science magazines in the world. The invitations were extended by the then–editor-in-chief, and Epstein was scheduled to attend at least two meetings. The emails show that the editor acknowledged Epstein’s interest in how scientific topics were selected and covered by the publication, implying that he may have been exploring ways to influence or replicate that process for his own ventures.Although the magazine later stated that Epstein ultimately did not attend those meetings, the fact that he was invited at all raises disturbing questions about how deeply embedded he was within elite scientific and media circles. It underscores his broader pattern of using money, charm, and institutional access to infiltrate areas of influence—including not just academia and research, but now journalism. That an alleged serial trafficker could get within striking distance of editorial control at a legacy science publication speaks volumes about the blind spots of power and the ease with which he operated under the guise of philanthropy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein Invited to Scientific American Editorial Meetings (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

24 Juli 13min

Spencer Kuvin Doesn't Buy The Narrative Surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's Death

Spencer Kuvin Doesn't Buy The Narrative Surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's Death

Spencer Kuvin, who represented multiple victims of Jeffrey Epstein, has consistently voiced serious doubts about the official claim that Epstein’s death was a suicide. According to Kuvin, Epstein was arrogant, self-assured, and utterly convinced that he would never face true accountability. He described Epstein as someone who believed he was untouchable, which made the news of his death feel immediately suspicious. In Kuvin’s view, Epstein’s narcissism and belief in his own invincibility made him the least likely person to take his own life while awaiting trial.Kuvin has also emphasized the troubling pattern of failed safeguards at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, such as broken cameras, inattentive guards, and questionable autopsy findings, as reasons to reject the suicide narrative. While not indulging in outright conspiracy, he believes the sheer volume of irregularities surrounding Epstein’s death forms a compelling case for foul play. To him, the idea that all of these failures were mere coincidence strains credibility and leaves open the possibility that Epstein was silenced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7386035/Attorney-Jeffrey-Epsteins-victims-believes-pedophile-financier-MURDERED.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Juli 15min

Melinda Gates Discusses The Relationship Between Bill Gates And Jeffrey Epstein

Melinda Gates Discusses The Relationship Between Bill Gates And Jeffrey Epstein

Melinda French Gates has described her single meeting with Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 as deeply unsettling, stating that she “regretted it the second [she] walked in the door” and later referred to him as “evil personified.” She said the dinner at his Manhattan residence left her disturbed—uncomfortable with both the setting and her then-husband Bill’s decision to associate with Epstein. Her unease was so strong that she made her disapproval known directly to Bill, highlighting how Epstein’s presence and ties created significant tension in their marriageMoreover, Melinda has indicated that Epstein’s involvement with Bill Gates became one of the contributing factors in her decision to seek a divorce after 27 years of marriage. In her memoir and past interviews, she has attributed part of the breakdown in their relationship to what she viewed as Bill’s ill-advised meetings and connection with Epstein. The public resurgence of her comments—calling Epstein abhorrent and acknowledging how the revelations caused nightmares—has underscored her continuing disapproval of that association.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comTo contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10573431/Melinda-Gates-slams-Bills-friendship-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-CBS-interview.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Juli 26min

A Comprehensive Look At The DOJ's Decision To Meet With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 2) (7/23/25)

A Comprehensive Look At The DOJ's Decision To Meet With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 2) (7/23/25)

The DOJ’s decision to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell after years of declaring the Epstein investigation closed is being met with deep skepticism. Critics argue that the timing—coinciding with mounting public and congressional pressure over the Epstein cover-up—suggests this is less about justice and more about optics. Maxwell is a convicted perjurer and trafficker with zero credibility, and any cooperation from her at this late stage is likely viewed as self-serving. The DOJ’s sudden willingness to hear her out, despite previously insisting there was no further evidence, raises serious doubts about their motivations and whether this is merely a distraction tactic designed to pacify outrage.Rather than pursuing unprosecuted co-conspirators or unsealing the trove of sealed Epstein files, the DOJ has opted for a tightly controlled, low-risk meeting with a disgraced inmate already behind bars. This move is seen by many as classic “bread and circus”—a gesture meant to create the illusion of accountability without threatening the powerful or reopening the case in a meaningful way. Unless the government follows this meeting with real indictments, transparency, and bold legal action, the public will continue to view it as hollow theater—a last-ditch attempt to salvage credibility in a case defined by betrayal, secrecy, and elite protection.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Juli 13min

A Comprehensive Look At The DOJ's Decision To Meet With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 1) (7/23/25)

A Comprehensive Look At The DOJ's Decision To Meet With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 1) (7/23/25)

The DOJ’s decision to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell after years of declaring the Epstein investigation closed is being met with deep skepticism. Critics argue that the timing—coinciding with mounting public and congressional pressure over the Epstein cover-up—suggests this is less about justice and more about optics. Maxwell is a convicted perjurer and trafficker with zero credibility, and any cooperation from her at this late stage is likely viewed as self-serving. The DOJ’s sudden willingness to hear her out, despite previously insisting there was no further evidence, raises serious doubts about their motivations and whether this is merely a distraction tactic designed to pacify outrage.Rather than pursuing unprosecuted co-conspirators or unsealing the trove of sealed Epstein files, the DOJ has opted for a tightly controlled, low-risk meeting with a disgraced inmate already behind bars. This move is seen by many as classic “bread and circus”—a gesture meant to create the illusion of accountability without threatening the powerful or reopening the case in a meaningful way. Unless the government follows this meeting with real indictments, transparency, and bold legal action, the public will continue to view it as hollow theater—a last-ditch attempt to salvage credibility in a case defined by betrayal, secrecy, and elite protection.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Juli 11min

Mark Epstein Expresses His Doubts About The DOJ's New Found Interest In Ghislaine Maxwell (7/23/25)

Mark Epstein Expresses His Doubts About The DOJ's New Found Interest In Ghislaine Maxwell (7/23/25)

Mark Epstein, Jeffrey’s younger brother, responded to the DOJ’s announcement that it is reaching out to Ghislaine Maxwell by doubling down on his longtime suspicion that his brother’s official death was a homicide, not a suicide. He criticized the Department’s video release and other materials as misleading or incomplete, stating that they omit crucial evidence—for example, he disputes that the footage even shows Epstein’s actual cell, saying “that video is bullshit.” Mark also reiterated his belief that government agencies are withholding details, insisting that “they’re holding things back” and that meaningful transparency remains absent.Despite the DOJ’s shift toward engaging Maxwell—which it says may be key to identifying additional perpetrators—Mark remains doubtful that any forthcoming testimony or disclosures will address the core mysteries: who orchestrated his brother’s death and whether the full scope of Epstein’s network will ever be revealed. As Maxwell and her legal team negotiate the terms of her cooperation, Mark continues to call for a full reopening of the investigation into Jeffrey’s death and broader transparency around Epstein-related evidence.to contact me:Jeffrey Epstein's brother claims the true motive behind Trump's DOJ meeting Ghislaine Maxwell is nothing to do with 'what she knows' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

23 Juli 14min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
motiv
p3-krim
svenska-fall
rss-krimstad
fordomspodden
rss-viva-fotboll
flashback-forever
olyckan-inifran
aftonbladet-daily
rss-sanning-konsekvens
svd-nyhetsartiklar
rss-vad-fan-hande
dagens-eko
rss-frandfors-horna
blenda-2
svd-dokumentara-berattelser-2
rss-flodet
rss-krimreportrarna
mannen-utan-spar