Mega Edition: Epstein, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos And The Billionaires Dinner They Want To Forget (9/20/25)

After Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students, the case reached legal closure—but left the public and the victims’ families with a hollow sense of justice. There was no trial, no testimony, and no explanation. The motive remains unknown. Kohberger said nothing about why he did it, who he targeted, or what compelled him to carry out such a calculated slaughter. His plea secured a life sentence and spared him the death penalty, but it also shielded him from having to explain the most haunting aspect of this crime: the why. With no cross-examination, no full public release of forensic evidence, and no opportunity for the families to confront him in a courtroom, the plea feels more like a surrender of truth than a victory for justice.While the prosecution’s decision to accept the plea deal is understandable from a legal and strategic perspective—it avoids the trauma of a capital trial, guarantees a conviction, and locks Kohberger away for life—it doesn’t satisfy the moral and emotional weight of the crime. The unanswered questions linger: Why that house? Why those students? Was this random, or the product of a disturbed obsession? And most importantly, will Kohberger ever explain? Maybe someday he will. But until then, he remains more than a killer—he’s a thief of resolution, a man who walked out of that house covered in blood and has chosen silence ever since. And that silence, more than anything else, is what continues to scream.to contact me:bobbycapucciBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Okt 17min

Bill Barr’s deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein’s death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr’s narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr’s evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump’s knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein’s death but couldn’t recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr’s testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Okt 11min

Harvard might get most of the heat for cozying up to Jeffrey Epstein, but the truth is they weren’t the only ones. Yale and other elite universities had no problem taking his money either, despite his reputation being no secret. These schools, the so-called moral authorities of the nation, were happy to look the other way because Epstein gave them access to wealth, prestige, and connections they craved. They didn’t care about ethics or victims—they cared about the checks clearing and the glow of being tied to “high society.” They polished up his image, let him act like a respected patron of science and learning, and in doing so, helped him regain legitimacy after his first arrest.Now they play dumb, acting shocked and appalled, pretending they didn’t know who he was. But it’s a performance. These universities weren’t fooled—they were complicit. Harvard, Yale, Princeton, all of them chased Epstein’s money, banking on silence and prestige to protect them. And the worst part is, they only “review” donor policies after they’ve been caught, not when it mattered. The mask is off now, and the hypocrisy of the Ivy League is plain as day: they weren’t just negligent, they were partners in giving Epstein cover.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein’s 2003 birthday album signed by three former Yale professors - Yale Daily NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Okt 15min

Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson have found themselves scratched off the guest list for this year’s royal family Christmas at Sandringham, and the reason isn’t exactly a mystery. Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein continue to poison whatever’s left of his reputation, and the royal household clearly doesn’t want that shadow hanging over their holiday gathering. Even though Sarah isn’t directly connected to the scandal, her long-running closeness with Andrew—still living together, still tied at the hip—makes her guilty by association in the court of public perception. The message is plain enough: they’re not welcome, because their presence would remind the world of a scandal the monarchy would rather bury under the rug.For Andrew, it’s another step in his slow-motion exile. He’s already been stripped of titles, sidelined from public life, and reduced to a background figure who occasionally pops up to embarrassment. Now, even the family dinner table is out of reach. Ferguson, despite her own efforts to stay in the public’s good graces, is paying the price for her connection to him. To be told “don’t come to Christmas” by your own family says everything about how far Andrew has fallen—and how desperate the royals are to keep him, and anyone standing next to him, out of sight during their most visible traditions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Okt 10min

After revelations surfaced of his close ties and supportive messages to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Lord Peter Mandelson was dismissed as the UK’s ambassador to the United States by Prime Minister Keir Starmer. However, despite being “removed with immediate effect,” reports indicate that the government has not yet formally severed his employment status. As a result, he remains on the payroll and is said to be eligible for compensation, possibly a six-figure package, pending legal or contractual settlement.Separately, the advisory firm Global Counsel, which Mandelson co-founded, has moved to strip him of voting rights and dividends tied to his 21 % stake in the firm, effectively cutting off his financial benefits while it seeks to divest his holdings entirely. While public attention has focused on whether the state will continue paying him, significant steps have already been taken internally to limit his income streams from his private ventures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: Lord Mandelson is STILL being paid his six-figure salary despite being sacked as Britain's US Ambassador more than two weeks ago | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Okt 13min

The Epstein scandal exposed how deep corruption runs, but higher academia mostly slipped away untouched. Despite Epstein having offices at Harvard, donations to MIT, and close ties with professors, universities escaped the same scrutiny that crushed others. They played dumb, claimed ignorance, and hid behind words like “research” while pocketing predator money. Meanwhile, they still preach ethics and morality to the rest of us, acting like they’re society’s conscience while proving they’ll side with cash over principle every single time.For working-class folks, the double standard is glaring. Ordinary people get hammered for the smallest mistakes, while billion-dollar institutions with political connections remain untouchable. Justice isn’t blind; it looks straight at the bank account before moving. The universities knew what they were doing, yet faced no real punishment. Until someone has the guts to drag academia into the same light as everyone else, it’s on us to keep the pressure on, to not forget, and to make sure their role in this rotten system never gets buried.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Okt 11min

Billy Kipkorir Chemirmir was a Kenyan-American murderer and suspected serial killer linked to a string of deaths among elderly women in North Texas. Between 2016 and 2018, he is believed to have posed as a caregiver or maintenance worker to gain access to senior living communities, where he smothered victims—often with pillows—before stealing jewelry and valuables. Though investigators connected him to more than 20 suspicious deaths, he was formally indicted on 22 capital murder counts. Ultimately, he was convicted of two murders in Dallas County and sentenced to life in prison without parole.In September 2023, while serving his sentence in the Coffield Unit in Texas, Chemirmir was killed by his cellmate. His crimes exposed systemic flaws in how elderly deaths were classified, as many of his victims’ deaths were initially written off as natural causes, delaying recognition of his pattern. The case sparked outrage and demands for reforms in oversight of senior housing facilities and postmortem investigations, highlighting the vulnerability of elderly populations to predatory violence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Okt 30min

Cary Stayner is a convicted American serial killer whose crimes shocked the nation in 1999. He was the older brother of Steven Stayner, whose childhood abduction and dramatic escape years later had already made the family infamous. While Steven was once portrayed as a tragic hero, Cary’s life spiraled into darkness. Working as a handyman near Yosemite National Park, Cary outwardly seemed quiet and unremarkable, but he harbored violent fantasies from a young age. His troubled background, compounded by his brother’s notoriety, set the stage for his eventual eruption into brutal violence that would stain his name and overshadow the legacy of his family.The Yosemite Village murders refer to the killings of four women in and around Yosemite National Park in 1999. Cary Stayner first targeted three tourists—Carole Sund, her daughter Juli, and Juli’s friend Silvina Pelosso—whom he abducted, sexually assaulted, and murdered, before later killing Joie Armstrong, a Yosemite park naturalist. These crimes terrorized the community and drew massive media attention, not only because of their brutality but also because they occurred in such a famed natural landmark. Stayner was arrested and confessed, later being sentenced to death. The case became one of the most infamous examples of serial murder in California history, forever linking Yosemite with a dark chapter of violence and betrayal of trust.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.outsideonline.com/adventure-travel/yosemite-horror/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Okt 59min