Murder In Moscow: Judge Hippler And The Threat Of Sanctions Due To Leaks
In the ongoing trial of Bryan Kohberger, accused of the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, a significant development has arisen concerning unauthorized information leaks. Judge Steven Hippler has ordered an investigation into potential violations of a gag order after confidential case details, including Kohberger's internet search history and cellphone data, were aired in a May 9 episode of NBC's "Dateline" . The judge has mandated that both prosecution and defense teams submit lists of individuals who had access to the leaked information, encompassing staff, law enforcement, and consultants. He also indicated a willingness to appoint a special prosecutor to identify the source of the leak .The implications of these leaks are profound. Legal experts suggest that if the leaked information is deemed to have compromised the fairness of the trial, it could lead to the exclusion of critical evidence, such as surveillance footage and cellphone records, which are pivotal to the prosecution's case . Such exclusions could hinder the prosecution's ability to establish Kohberger's presence at the crime scene. Furthermore, the leaks may complicate jury selection by affecting potential jurors' impartiality, potentially prolonging the trial and increasing costs. Judge Hippler emphasized the necessity of identifying and holding accountable those responsible for the leaks to uphold the integrity of the judicial process .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge may exclude leaked Bryan Kohberger murder evidence from trial: Expert | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Aug 12min
Should Bryan Kohberger Have Been Granted A Change In Venue?
The ongoing legal battle between the state of Idaho and Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of killing four University of Idaho students in 2022, has been particularly intense regarding the venue for his upcoming trial. Kohberger's defense team has repeatedly requested a change of venue, arguing that he cannot receive a fair trial in Latah County due to the extensive media coverage and the small, potentially biased jury pool. They have specifically requested the trial be moved to Ada County, nearly 300 miles away, which they believe would provide a more impartial jury.The prosecution, however, has opposed this request, insisting that Latah County is a suitable venue and that moving the trial would not significantly improve the chances of a fair trial. They argue that media coverage and public opinion have been widespread and would likely follow the trial wherever it is held in Idaho.The legal back-and-forth has also been complicated by a series of other pre-trial motions and hearings, many of which have frustrated both the families of the victims and the judge overseeing the case. These include debates over evidence, such as the use of investigative genetic genealogy by the prosecution and the defense’s requests for broader access to this evidence. Additionally, the defense’s alibi strategy has been another point of contention, as they have claimed that Kohberger was "out driving" at the time of the murders, but have struggled to provide specific details to support this claim.A hearing is scheduled for August 29, 2024, to further address the change of venue request, and the trial itself is set to begin in June 2025. The extended pre-trial proceedings have drawn criticism for their slow pace, adding to the tension surrounding this high-profile case(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Aug 11min
Diddy Scores A Huge Win As Judge Rakoff Dismisses The Sara Rivers Complaint (8/15/25)
Judge Jed S. Rakoff delivered a substantial legal victory for Combs, dismissing 21 of the 22 counts in Sara Rivers’ $60 million lawsuit with prejudice, meaning those allegations cannot be refiled. The dismissed claims included accusations of racketeering, assault and battery, forced labor, sexual harassment, false imprisonment, and more—severe charges asserting a hostile and inhumane work environment during her time on Making the Band 2.The only count still pending is under the Gender‑Motivated Violence Protection Act—Count 15. Its future hinges on an appellate court ruling, as the judge paused a final decision on whether to dismiss it with or without prejudice. Rivers’ attorney, Ariel Mitchell, expressed intentions to appeal, stating they “look forward to more litigation specifically against Mr. Combs." Meanwhile, Combs’ camp praised the ruling, calling the claims “meritless, time‑barred, and legally deficient,” and thanked the court for its swift resolution of what they considered baseless accusations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:'Making the Band' singer Sara Rivers' lawsuit against Diddy dismissedBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Aug 10min
Morning Update: Will The Epstein Testimony From Those Subpoenaed Be Public? (8/15/25)
In July 2025, a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee voted 8–2 to authorize subpoenas for the Department of Justice’s complete cache of files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking investigation. The move came just before Congress’s summer recess, following growing public pressure and bipartisan calls for transparency on how Epstein was investigated, who he was connected to, and why certain prosecutorial decisions were made. Lawmakers framed the action as an accountability measure aimed at uncovering potential government mishandling or preferential treatment, while the timing suggested an intent to keep the issue in public focus during the legislative break.On August 5, 2025, Committee Chair James Comer formally issued the subpoenas, setting strict deadlines. The DOJ was ordered to produce documents by August 19. A series of deposition subpoenas were also sent to high-profile figures with dates spanning late summer into the fall: William Barr (Aug. 18), Alberto Gonzales (Aug. 26), Jeff Sessions (Aug. 28), Robert Mueller (Sept. 2), Loretta Lynch (Sept. 9), Eric Holder (Sept. 30), Merrick Garland (Oct. 2), Hillary Clinton (Oct. 9), and Bill Clinton (Oct. 14). This schedule positioned the investigation to unfold in stages, with a steady cadence of witness appearances leading into October.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein testimony: Will D.C. testimony be public or private?Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Aug 16min
Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger And His Demented Internet Searches (8/15/25)
Digital forensics testimony: Heather Barnhart, a digital forensics expert from Cellebrite, was slated to testify about Kohberger’s phone and hard drive. She revealed that he had meticulously downloaded full PDF files and information on more than 20 serial killers—including Ted Bundy and Danny Rolling—both before and after the murders, suggesting this wasn’t casual browsing but "meticulous research.” Barnhart noted Kohberger even downloaded updates from the Moscow Police Department multiple times following the killings, shedding light on his detailed online activity surrounding the crimes.Forensic analysts also intended to testify that Kohberger’s internet activity included repeated searches for the University of Idaho murders, nonconsensual pornography with terms like “forced” and “sleeping,” and research into psychopathy and sociopathy. They linked these searches to cell-tower data placing his phone near the victims’ home on 23 separate occasions in the four months leading up to the murders. Prosecutors planned to present this combination of digital evidence and location data as showing both premeditation and a pattern of voyeuristic, predatory behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's graphic internet searches revealed in never-before-seen evidence | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Aug 13min
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe And Her 2008 Jeffrey Epstein Deposition (Part 4) (8/15/25)
In the mid-2000s, Jeffrey Epstein faced mounting allegations in Palm Beach, Florida, that he had sexually abused dozens of underage girls under the guise of paying them for massages. The case began in 2005 when the parents of a 14-year-old girl reported him to local police, prompting a months-long investigation that uncovered a network of young girls—many recruited by other minors—who said they were coerced into sexual acts at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion. Police gathered statements, physical evidence, and corroborating accounts, ultimately identifying over 30 potential victims. The Palm Beach Police Department recommended multiple felony charges, including unlawful sexual activity with minors and lewd and lascivious acts.Instead of proceeding to a state trial, the case was taken over by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, leading to the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Brokered behind closed doors, the NPA allowed Epstein to plead guilty in state court to two lesser prostitution-related charges—one involving a minor—in exchange for federal prosecutors agreeing not to pursue broader sex trafficking charges. He served 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail under a work-release program that let him leave six days a week. The deal also granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators,” effectively shielding alleged enablers from prosecution. This resolution, kept secret from victims in violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, became a flashpoint for public outrage and later federal litigation when it was revealed just how sweeping and lenient the agreement had been.In this episode, we see that corruption in action as we hear from one of Jeffrey Epstein's first accusers during a deposition given in 2008.to contact me:gov.uscourts.flsd.318730.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Aug 13min
In Their Own Words: Jane Doe And Her 2008 Jeffrey Epstein Deposition (Part 3) (8/15/25)
In the mid-2000s, Jeffrey Epstein faced mounting allegations in Palm Beach, Florida, that he had sexually abused dozens of underage girls under the guise of paying them for massages. The case began in 2005 when the parents of a 14-year-old girl reported him to local police, prompting a months-long investigation that uncovered a network of young girls—many recruited by other minors—who said they were coerced into sexual acts at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion. Police gathered statements, physical evidence, and corroborating accounts, ultimately identifying over 30 potential victims. The Palm Beach Police Department recommended multiple felony charges, including unlawful sexual activity with minors and lewd and lascivious acts.Instead of proceeding to a state trial, the case was taken over by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, leading to the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Brokered behind closed doors, the NPA allowed Epstein to plead guilty in state court to two lesser prostitution-related charges—one involving a minor—in exchange for federal prosecutors agreeing not to pursue broader sex trafficking charges. He served 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail under a work-release program that let him leave six days a week. The deal also granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators,” effectively shielding alleged enablers from prosecution. This resolution, kept secret from victims in violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, became a flashpoint for public outrage and later federal litigation when it was revealed just how sweeping and lenient the agreement had been.In this episode, we see that corruption in action as we hear from one of Jeffrey Epstein's first accusers during a deposition given in 2008.to contact me:gov.uscourts.flsd.318730.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Aug 11min
Virginia Roberts 2nd Amended Response To Ghislaine Maxwell's 1st Discovery Request (Part 5-6) (8/15/25)
In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
15 Aug 28min
