The Man Who Made Introductions: Epstein’s Currency of Connection (11/14/25)

Ashley Guillard, a tik tok content creator who claims to have psychic power and an inate spiritual ability that lets her solve crimes, has had all of her motions to dismiss the lawsuit against her denied by the Judge overseeing the case.In this episode we begin our look at that ruling.(commercial at 10:01)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.idd.51326.59.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

11 Okt 10min

Ashley Guillard, a tik tok content creator who claims to have psychic power and an inate spiritual ability that lets her solve crimes, has had all of her motions to dismiss the lawsuit against her denied by the Judge overseeing the case.In this episode we begin our look at that ruling.(commercial at 10:01)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.idd.51326.59.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

11 Okt 16min

Liza Gardner’s lawsuit, filed in November 2023 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, alleges that in 1990 she was sexually assaulted by Sean “Diddy” Combs and singer Aaron Hall when she was 16 years old. According to her complaint, Gardner attended an event hosted by MCA Records, where she and a friend were given drinks and then invited to an after-party at Hall’s apartment. She claims Combs coerced her into having sex with him, then as she was dressing, Hall entered the room, pinned her down, and forced her to have sex with him too. She also asserts that in the days following the assault, Combs came to her home, beat and choked her until she lost consciousness.In her amended complaint, Gardner emphasizes that she was a minor at the time—under New York’s age of consent in 1990—and contends that she could not legally consent to drinking alcohol with the accused. She further alleges that the sexual assault left her with lasting psychological harm, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and difficulty forming relationships.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.njd.551633.42.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

11 Okt 10min

Liza Gardner’s lawsuit, filed in November 2023 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, alleges that in 1990 she was sexually assaulted by Sean “Diddy” Combs and singer Aaron Hall when she was 16 years old. According to her complaint, Gardner attended an event hosted by MCA Records, where she and a friend were given drinks and then invited to an after-party at Hall’s apartment. She claims Combs coerced her into having sex with him, then as she was dressing, Hall entered the room, pinned her down, and forced her to have sex with him too. She also asserts that in the days following the assault, Combs came to her home, beat and choked her until she lost consciousness.In her amended complaint, Gardner emphasizes that she was a minor at the time—under New York’s age of consent in 1990—and contends that she could not legally consent to drinking alcohol with the accused. She further alleges that the sexual assault left her with lasting psychological harm, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and difficulty forming relationships.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.njd.551633.42.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

11 Okt 10min

Liza Gardner’s lawsuit, filed in November 2023 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, alleges that in 1990 she was sexually assaulted by Sean “Diddy” Combs and singer Aaron Hall when she was 16 years old. According to her complaint, Gardner attended an event hosted by MCA Records, where she and a friend were given drinks and then invited to an after-party at Hall’s apartment. She claims Combs coerced her into having sex with him, then as she was dressing, Hall entered the room, pinned her down, and forced her to have sex with him too. She also asserts that in the days following the assault, Combs came to her home, beat and choked her until she lost consciousness.In her amended complaint, Gardner emphasizes that she was a minor at the time—under New York’s age of consent in 1990—and contends that she could not legally consent to drinking alcohol with the accused. She further alleges that the sexual assault left her with lasting psychological harm, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and difficulty forming relationships.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.njd.551633.42.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

11 Okt 12min

During the unsealing of court documents in Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, a number of “John Doe” or anonymous names surfaced—people referenced in depositions, emails, flight logs and other records whose identities had been redacted or withheld. Some of these John Does were mentioned as having visited Epstein or Maxwell properties, flown on Epstein’s jet, or otherwise been connected to the network via financial, travel, or social links. Because the documents came out in a defamation suit and related litigation, not all John Does were fully identified or confirmed; many remain placeholders, potential suspects, or persons of interest whose roles and involvements are unclear in public records.These John Does illustrate the depth and reach of Epstein and Maxwell’s circle: even before unsealing, observers suspected powerful, anonymous backers and clients were being shielded behind redactions. The fact that so many names were initially hidden (and still are) underscores how legal agreements, confidentiality orders, and sealed records have long protected the identities of those who may have stood behind Epstein’s operations. The exposure of some of these John Does triggered renewed calls to unseal more documents and to force accountability for those whose names were buried in silence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

11 Okt 45min

Doug Band, once Bill Clinton’s closest aide and political gatekeeper, worked alongside the former president for nearly two decades. He co-founded the Clinton Global Initiative and later launched the advisory firm Teneo, which connected major corporate clients with powerful political figures. Band was instrumental in managing Clinton’s post-White House image, philanthropy, and network of donors. But over time, he became disillusioned with the Clintons, eventually distancing himself after a falling-out with both Bill and Chelsea. His later comments shed new light on Clinton’s long-denied ties to Jeffrey Epstein, raising questions about how close Clinton’s circle really was to the disgraced financier.In a 2020 Vanity Fair profile, Band claimed that Clinton had indeed visited Epstein’s private island, Little St. James, in January 2003—a claim the former president has repeatedly denied. Band also said Clinton took multiple flights on Epstein’s private jet, which flight logs confirm, though Clinton’s team insists those trips were tied to Clinton Foundation work. Band’s assertions carried weight because of his insider access, but they also came years after his break from the Clintons, leading some to question whether personal bitterness played a role. Still, the details he shared reignited scrutiny of Clinton’s Epstein connections, particularly given that Band himself was part of the inner machinery that once managed both men’s overlapping worlds of power, money, and influence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

11 Okt 36min

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, originally designed to dismantle organized crime syndicates like the mafia, has evolved into a powerful legal tool used to prosecute a wide range of criminal enterprises, including those involving high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. RICO allows prosecutors to target entire criminal organizations, holding leaders accountable for the actions of their subordinates by linking various crimes—such as fraud, drug trafficking, and sexual misconduct—into a broader criminal enterprise. This statute has been instrumental in cases like those of R. Kelly and Keith Raniere, where both men were convicted for operating criminal networks that exploited vulnerable individuals under the guise of legitimate businesses or celebrity status.Sean Combs now faces RICO charges, as prosecutors allege that he operated a criminal enterprise involving sexual misconduct and other criminal activities, with enablers supporting and facilitating his actions. The RICO charges mark a significant escalation in Combs' legal battle, and the potential for superseding indictments could further expand the scope of the case. As seen in previous high-profile RICO cases, this approach enables prosecutors to systematically dismantle the criminal network around the defendant. The outcome of Combs' case could set a new precedent for how the legal system addresses powerful figures in the entertainment industry, reaffirming that no one is beyond the reach of the law, regardless of their wealth or influence.At Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024 hearing, he appeared in Manhattan federal court before Judge Arun Subramanian. The session mainly involved setting deadlines for both the defense and prosecution to file their legal arguments in preparation for the upcoming trial, which is expected to take place in May of 2025.Diddy remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. His defense continues to push for his release on bail, which has been denied multiple times due to concerns about witness tampering and flight risk. His legal team had previously offered a $50 million bail package, which included home detention and electronic monitoring, but it was rejected as the court considered him a potential danger to the community.During Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024, hearing, his legal team addressed concerns about potential media leaks related to evidence in his case. His attorneys requested that the court impose a gag order to prevent further leaks from law enforcement, which they claim have already influenced public perception and could affect the fairness of the trial. Diddy's team alleges that government agents leaked sensitive material, including a 2016 surveillance video, to the media, compromising his right to a fair trial. The judge has asked the sides to draw up acceptable language for the order.The charges against Diddy include sex trafficking and racketeering, with allegations dating back to 2008. Prosecutors claim that he ran a criminal enterprise, coercing women with the help of his associates and using violence, blackmail, and other forms of intimidation to silence victims. The court appearance also allowed for both sides to discuss procedural aspects, such as evidence handling, and outline the next steps leading up to the high-profile trial. Diddy has pleaded not guilty to all chargesto contact me:  bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May trial date set for Diddy to face sex trafficking charges | AP NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

11 Okt 29min