Is this investigation A Search For Truth Or  An Attempt To Bury The Epstein’s Files Forever? (Part 3) (11/18/25)

Is this investigation A Search For Truth Or An Attempt To Bury The Epstein’s Files Forever? (Part 3) (11/18/25)

The controversy surrounding the Epstein files has intensified following President Trump’s public directive calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to launch a new investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s associations—specifically targeting political opponents and several high-profile figures in finance and technology. The timing of this announcement is drawing significant scrutiny, arriving just months after the DOJ and FBI publicly stated that they had already conducted a comprehensive review of all Epstein-related materials, including more than 300 gigabytes of digital evidence, and concluded there was no basis to open any further criminal inquiries. That review asserted that the majority of evidence remained sealed primarily to protect victims and that there was no credible evidence of an Epstein “client list” or coordinated blackmail operation. Critics argue that the sudden reversal raises red flags about political motivations rather than new facts, particularly as Congress moves forward with a discharge petition intended to force the release of unredacted Epstein records to the public.

Legal scholars and government accountability watchdogs warn that labeling this sudden initiative an “ongoing investigation” could be used to halt congressional access to Epstein-related records and effectively freeze public disclosure for months or even years. Under DOJ policy, active investigations allow the government to withhold documents that would otherwise be subject to subpoenas or release mandates, raising concerns that the move could function as a procedural shield rather than a legitimate inquiry. Critics argue that invoking investigative privilege at this moment—after years of limited transparency and repeated failures to hold institutions accountable—risks undermining public trust in the justice system and may set a dangerous precedent in which politically motivated probes are used to obstruct oversight. With bipartisan pressure continuing to build around the discharge petition seeking full release of the Epstein files, the coming weeks will test whether Congress can assert its authority or whether the executive branch can successfully deploy legal mechanisms to re-seal evidence and control the narrative around one of the most consequential criminal scandals in modern American history.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

The Gilgo Beach Murders:   How Shannan Gilbert Became An Unintended Hero  (Part 1)

The Gilgo Beach Murders: How Shannan Gilbert Became An Unintended Hero (Part 1)

In May 2010, Shannan Gilbert vanished after calling 911 from a client’s home in Oak Beach, Long Island, claiming someone was chasing her. What began as a missing-person investigation for Shannan unexpectedly sparked one of the largest homicide probes in Long Island’s history. Her disappearance prompted authorities to expand the search area, leading to the discovery in December 2010 of four bodies—later known as the “Gilgo Four”—which revealed a potential serial killing spree along Ocean Parkway. Although Shannan’s death was eventually ruled accidental by drowning, her absence served as the catalyst for uncovering these victims and thrusting the broader case into the public eye.Shannan’s mother, Mari Gilbert, harnessed her grief into unyielding activism, pressuring law enforcement for accountability and greater transparency in her daughter’s case—and by extension, the larger investigation. Her persistent advocacy earned Shannan the label of an "unintended hero": it was her disappearance that opened the door to solving—or at least recognizing—the pattern of murders that might otherwise have remained hidden. Mari’s efforts kept media and public attention focused on the victims, laid groundwork for further forensic investigation, and ultimately helped bring about a suspect’s arrest in the long-standing Gilgo murders.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Mari Gilbert's quest to find daughter Shannan led to arrest of Rex Heuermann | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Sep 12min

From Newsnight to 2015: How Prince Andrew Misled the World About Jeffrey Epstein (9/1/25)

From Newsnight to 2015: How Prince Andrew Misled the World About Jeffrey Epstein (9/1/25)

Newly uncovered leaked emails show that Prince Andrew remained in contact with Jeffrey Epstein until at least 2015—five years longer than the Duke claimed in his infamous 2019 Newsnight interview. At the time, Andrew insisted he cut ties after meeting Epstein in December 2010, following Epstein’s sex crime conviction. But the emails, originating from former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s hacked inbox, include messages where Epstein passed along information attributed directly to “Andrew,” with Epstein confirming the source. These discussions involved potential business ventures, including a private security project in China.The revelations directly contradict Andrew’s carefully crafted public narrative and expose him as a man who misled the public, the monarchy, and investigators about the true extent of his ties to Epstein. By insisting he severed contact in 2010 while secretly maintaining communications for years, Andrew not only damaged his own credibility but also dragged the Royal Family deeper into scandal. His willingness to keep dealing with a convicted sex offender behind the scenes reveals a level of arrogance and dishonesty that makes his 2019 Newsnight denials look like a calculated performance. Far from being a victim of bad judgment, Andrew now appears complicit in sustaining a relationship he knew was toxic, raising the question of what else he has concealed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prince Andrew 'remained in contact with Jeffrey Epstein five years longer than he claimed in Newsnight interview', emails suggest | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Sep 17min

Morning Update:  Jeffrey Epstein, The Treasury Department And The Red Flags That Were  Ignored (9/1/25)

Morning Update: Jeffrey Epstein, The Treasury Department And The Red Flags That Were Ignored (9/1/25)

Suspicious Activity Reports, or SARs, are confidential filings that financial institutions are legally required to send to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) whenever they detect transactions that may indicate money laundering, fraud, sanctions evasion, or other criminal activity. They’re not evidence of a crime by themselves, but rather red flags—signals that something looks off. Banks, casinos, brokerages, and even crypto platforms file them routinely, and once submitted, they’re closely guarded, unavailable to the public, and protected by strict “no tipping off” rules. Law enforcement uses SARs to trace illicit networks, connect patterns across different institutions, and build out investigations into everything from drug cartels and terrorist cells to human trafficking and large-scale fraud schemes.Now those same reports sit at the center of a political firestorm. House Oversight Chair James Comer has formally requested that the Treasury Department turn over all SARs connected to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. His demand signals an attempt to pull back the veil on what banks flagged about Epstein’s vast financial web—wires, transfers, shell accounts, and potential facilitators. If granted, the request could provide Congress with a rare inside look at the money trails behind Epstein’s operations, though it also raises thorny questions about confidentiality, precedent, and how much of this intelligence should be made public.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Comer requests Epstein, Maxwell records from Treasury Secretary | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Sep 15min

Driving Ms. Maxwell:   Ghislaine Maxwell's Bid To Land A Prison Chauffer Gig (9/1/25)

Driving Ms. Maxwell: Ghislaine Maxwell's Bid To Land A Prison Chauffer Gig (9/1/25)

Ghislaine Maxwell, now housed at the minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas, attempted to secure one of the prison’s coveted “town driver” jobs—positions that allow trusted inmates to leave the facility and ferry others to appointments, bus stops, and airports. According to the Daily Mail, her application was swiftly rejected by prison officials, who deemed the 63-year-old sex trafficker far too high a flight risk to be allowed outside unsupervised. The refusal reportedly left Maxwell frustrated, as such roles are seen as the closest thing to freedom an inmate can have while still incarcerated. Instead, another woman was awarded the role, with sources noting that inmates had warned Maxwell there was no chance she would be granted that level of trust.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell's audacious bid to get job at cushy lock-up that would let her OUTSIDE the prison's walls | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Sep 17min

The Ghislaine Maxwell Tapes:  Transcripts From Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ Interview (Part 19) (9/1/25)

The Ghislaine Maxwell Tapes: Transcripts From Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ Interview (Part 19) (9/1/25)

On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Sep 12min

The Ghislaine Maxwell Tapes:  Transcripts From Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ Interview (Part 18) (9/1/25)

The Ghislaine Maxwell Tapes: Transcripts From Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ Interview (Part 18) (9/1/25)

On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Sep 14min

Mega Edition:  The Department Of Justice And The El Chapo Appeal Brief (Par 5-6) (9/1/25)

Mega Edition: The Department Of Justice And The El Chapo Appeal Brief (Par 5-6) (9/1/25)

Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Sep 25min

Mega Edition:  The Department Of Justice And The El Chapo Appeal Brief (Par 3-4) (9/1/25)

Mega Edition: The Department Of Justice And The El Chapo Appeal Brief (Par 3-4) (9/1/25)

Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

1 Sep 22min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

motiv
p3-krim
aftonbladet-krim
fordomspodden
blenda-2
rss-krimstad
svenska-fall
flashback-forever
rss-viva-fotboll
aftonbladet-daily
rss-vad-fan-hande
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-frandfors-horna
rss-krimreportrarna
dagens-eko
olyckan-inifran
grans
krimmagasinet
rss-flodet
svd-dokumentara-berattelser-2