Amarica's Constitution
Professor Akhil Reed Amar, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale University and one of the nation's leading authorities on the Constitution, offers weekly in-depth discussions on the most urgent and fascinating constitutional issues of our day. He is joined by co-host Andy Lipka and guests drawn from other top experts including Bob Woodward, Nina Totenberg, Neal Katyal, Lawrence Lessig, Michael Gerhardt, and many more.

Den här podcasten är hämtad från ett öppet RSS-flöde och publiceras inte av Podme. Den kan innehålla reklam.

Avsnitt(281)

Dissenting in Concurrence

Dissenting in Concurrence

The Trump v. Anderson lead balloon continues to smolder.  This episode looks at the areas wherein the concurring Justices took issue with the per curiam, and they are many.  Indeed, the three Justices...

20 Mars 20241h 37min

What the Concurrences Should Have Said

What the Concurrences Should Have Said

The concurrence by three Justices (as opposed to that of Justice Barrett) in Trump v. Anderson concurs only in the judgment.  We look at different types of concurrences and why a Justice might choose ...

13 Mars 20241h 16min

Happy Anniversary Mr. Lincoln from the Court

Happy Anniversary Mr. Lincoln from the Court

The Court has ruled in Trump v. Anderson, and a strange day it was.  An announcement on a Sunday of opinion on Monday; no justices present; metadata weirdness, and worst of all, a unanimous opinion th...

6 Mars 20241h 33min

Staking our Claim

Staking our Claim

We’re back, and still waiting for the opinion in Trump v. Anderson, which gives us a chance to highlight important new evidence that has come to light - thanks in large part to Professor Amar’s great ...

28 Feb 20241h 4min

What the Oral Argument Should Have Said - Part 2

What the Oral Argument Should Have Said - Part 2

As promised, we return in very short order with the completion of our analysis and response to the oral argument in Trump v. Anderson - before the Court has ruled. Again, key clips from the argument a...

15 Feb 20241h 48min

What the Oral Argument Should Have Said

What the Oral Argument Should Have Said

EARLY UPLOAD - The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson on Thursday, and we were so alarmed by the errant direction they took that we decided to take to the air early. Here are key ...

11 Feb 20241h 31min

20 Questions on Section 3 and Insurrection #1 - Special Guest Ted Widmer

20 Questions on Section 3 and Insurrection #1 - Special Guest Ted Widmer

Oral arguments are scheduled for this Thursday in the Trump v. Anderson case, concerning the possible disqualification of former President Trump from the ballot in Colorado, and with a myriad of quest...

7 Feb 20241h 47min

A Self-Educating Gaffe

A Self-Educating Gaffe

Oral arguments are approaching in the Trump v. Anderson case, and the nation is talking about little else.  At the Harvard Law School, Professor Amar is invited to debate a former US Attorney General ...

31 Jan 20241h 36min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

svenska-fall
motiv
aftonbladet-krim
p3-krim
spar
aftonbladet-daily
flashback-forever
rss-sanning-konsekvens
rss-expressen-dok
rss-krimreportrarna
rss-flodet
politiken
rss-frandfors-horna
rss-vad-fan-hande
olyckan-inifran
rss-aftonbladet-krim
svd-ledarredaktionen
kungligt
dagens-eko
rss-krimstad