#191 (Part 1) – Carl Shulman on the economy and national security after AGI

#191 (Part 1) – Carl Shulman on the economy and national security after AGI

This is the first part of our marathon interview with Carl Shulman. The second episode is on government and society after AGI. You can listen to them in either order!

The human brain does what it does with a shockingly low energy supply: just 20 watts — a fraction of a cent worth of electricity per hour. What would happen if AI technology merely matched what evolution has already managed, and could accomplish the work of top human professionals given a 20-watt power supply?

Many people sort of consider that hypothetical, but maybe nobody has followed through and considered all the implications as much as Carl Shulman. Behind the scenes, his work has greatly influenced how leaders in artificial general intelligence (AGI) picture the world they're creating.

Links to learn more, highlights, and full transcript.

Carl simply follows the logic to its natural conclusion. This is a world where 1 cent of electricity can be turned into medical advice, company management, or scientific research that would today cost $100s, resulting in a scramble to manufacture chips and apply them to the most lucrative forms of intellectual labour.

It's a world where, given their incredible hourly salaries, the supply of outstanding AI researchers quickly goes from 10,000 to 10 million or more, enormously accelerating progress in the field.

It's a world where companies operated entirely by AIs working together are much faster and more cost-effective than those that lean on humans for decision making, and the latter are progressively driven out of business.

It's a world where the technical challenges around control of robots are rapidly overcome, leading to robots into strong, fast, precise, and tireless workers able to accomplish any physical work the economy requires, and a rush to build billions of them and cash in.

As the economy grows, each person could effectively afford the practical equivalent of a team of hundreds of machine 'people' to help them with every aspect of their lives.

And with growth rates this high, it doesn't take long to run up against Earth's physical limits — in this case, the toughest to engineer your way out of is the Earth's ability to release waste heat. If this machine economy and its insatiable demand for power generates more heat than the Earth radiates into space, then it will rapidly heat up and become uninhabitable for humans and other animals.

This creates pressure to move economic activity off-planet. So you could develop effective populations of billions of scientific researchers operating on computer chips orbiting in space, sending the results of their work, such as drug designs, back to Earth for use.

These are just some of the wild implications that could follow naturally from truly embracing the hypothetical: what if we develop AGI that could accomplish everything that the most productive humans can, using the same energy supply?

In today's episode, Carl explains the above, and then host Rob Wiblin pushes back on whether that’s realistic or just a cool story, asking:

  • If we're heading towards the above, how come economic growth is slow now and not really increasing?
  • Why have computers and computer chips had so little effect on economic productivity so far?
  • Are self-replicating biological systems a good comparison for self-replicating machine systems?
  • Isn't this just too crazy and weird to be plausible?
  • What bottlenecks would be encountered in supplying energy and natural resources to this growing economy?
  • Might there not be severely declining returns to bigger brains and more training?
  • Wouldn't humanity get scared and pull the brakes if such a transformation kicked off?
  • If this is right, how come economists don't agree?

Finally, Carl addresses the moral status of machine minds themselves. Would they be conscious or otherwise have a claim to moral or rights? And how might humans and machines coexist with neither side dominating or exploiting the other?

Chapters:

  • Cold open (00:00:00)
  • Rob’s intro (00:01:00)
  • Transitioning to a world where AI systems do almost all the work (00:05:21)
  • Economics after an AI explosion (00:14:25)
  • Objection: Shouldn’t we be seeing economic growth rates increasing today? (00:59:12)
  • Objection: Speed of doubling time (01:07:33)
  • Objection: Declining returns to increases in intelligence? (01:11:59)
  • Objection: Physical transformation of the environment (01:17:39)
  • Objection: Should we expect an increased demand for safety and security? (01:29:14)
  • Objection: “This sounds completely whack” (01:36:10)
  • Income and wealth distribution (01:48:02)
  • Economists and the intelligence explosion (02:13:31)
  • Baumol effect arguments (02:19:12)
  • Denying that robots can exist (02:27:18)
  • Classic economic growth models (02:36:12)
  • Robot nannies (02:48:27)
  • Slow integration of decision-making and authority power (02:57:39)
  • Economists’ mistaken heuristics (03:01:07)
  • Moral status of AIs (03:11:45)
  • Rob’s outro (04:11:47)


Producer and editor: Keiran Harris
Audio engineering lead: Ben Cordell
Technical editing: Simon Monsour, Milo McGuire, and Dominic Armstrong
Transcriptions: Katy Moore

Jaksot(326)

#36 - Tanya Singh on ending the operations management bottleneck in effective altruism

#36 - Tanya Singh on ending the operations management bottleneck in effective altruism

Almost nobody is able to do groundbreaking physics research themselves, and by the time his brilliance was appreciated, Einstein was hardly limited by funding. But what if you could find a way to unlo...

11 Heinä 20182h 4min

#35 - Tara Mac Aulay on the audacity to fix the world without asking permission

#35 - Tara Mac Aulay on the audacity to fix the world without asking permission

"You don't need permission. You don't need to be allowed to do something that's not in your job description. If you think that it's gonna make your company or your organization more successful and mor...

21 Kesä 20181h 22min

Rob Wiblin on the art/science of a high impact career

Rob Wiblin on the art/science of a high impact career

Today's episode is a cross-post of an interview I did with The Jolly Swagmen Podcast which came out this week. I recommend regular listeners skip to 24 minutes in to avoid hearing things they already ...

8 Kesä 20181h 31min

#34 - We use the worst voting system that exists. Here's how Aaron Hamlin is going to fix it.

#34 - We use the worst voting system that exists. Here's how Aaron Hamlin is going to fix it.

In 1991 Edwin Edwards won the Louisiana gubernatorial election. In 2001, he was found guilty of racketeering and received a 10 year invitation to Federal prison. The strange thing about that election?...

1 Kesä 20182h 18min

#33 - Anders Sandberg on what if we ended ageing, solar flares & the annual risk of nuclear war

#33 - Anders Sandberg on what if we ended ageing, solar flares & the annual risk of nuclear war

Joseph Stalin had a life-extension program dedicated to making himself immortal. What if he had succeeded?  According to our last guest, Bryan Caplan, there’s an 80% chance that Stalin would still be ...

29 Touko 20181h 24min

#32 - Bryan Caplan on whether his Case Against Education holds up, totalitarianism, & open borders

#32 - Bryan Caplan on whether his Case Against Education holds up, totalitarianism, & open borders

Bryan Caplan’s claim in *The Case Against Education* is striking: education doesn’t teach people much, we use little of what we learn, and college is mostly about trying to seem smarter than other peo...

22 Touko 20182h 25min

#31 - Allan Dafoe on defusing the political & economic risks posed by existing AI capabilities

#31 - Allan Dafoe on defusing the political & economic risks posed by existing AI capabilities

The debate around the impacts of artificial intelligence often centres on ‘superintelligence’ - a general intellect that is much smarter than the best humans, in practically every field. But according...

18 Touko 201848min

#30 - Eva Vivalt on how little social science findings generalize from one study to another

#30 - Eva Vivalt on how little social science findings generalize from one study to another

If we have a study on the impact of a social program in a particular place and time, how confident can we be that we’ll get a similar result if we study the same program again somewhere else? Dr Eva V...

15 Touko 20182h 1min

Suosittua kategoriassa Koulutus

rss-murhan-anatomia
voi-hyvin-meditaatiot-2
rss-narsisti
psykopodiaa-podcast
adhd-podi
rahapuhetta
rss-uskonto-on-tylsaa
rss-liian-kuuma-peruna
rss-rahamania
kesken
rss-vapaudu-voimaasi
rss-niinku-asia-on
salainen-paivakirja
rss-duodecim-lehti
rss-tietoinen-yhteys-podcast-2
rss-koira-haudattuna
aloita-meditaatio
mielipaivakirja
esa-saarinen-filosofia-ja-systeemiajattelu
filocast-filosofian-perusteet