Judging Judy #28 - Appetite for Seduction (comedy podcast)

It’s back to April 1998, and we’ve got love triangles and motorcycle crashes in the courtroom today. Will Judy side with the woman who loaned her waiter money but was never paid back? Will Judy side with the ex-girlfriend who wrecked the motorcycle? And, even more importantly, will we find Judy innocent or will we find her guilty?
This is the Judging Judy podcast, the wildly popular comedy podcast that turns the tables on America’s least favorite TV judge. Each week, we dive into an episode of the long-running show to examine the cases, certainly, but even more interestingly, we analyze the Judge herself to determine if she did her job. If she did…well, then she’s innocent.
But, if not, she’s guilty.

In our first case, a woman and her husband claimed that they came to befriend their favorite waiter and, over time, trusted him enough to loan him cash. However, she claims that he ghosted them and never paid back the cash. He says, however, that cash was just one of many gifts he received from these two, and that they were motivated by romantic interest in him. Who will Judy decide deserves to get served?

Our second case features a young woman who always wanted to ride a motorcycle. When she started dating a guy who owned one, she convinced him to let her ride it. Unfortunately, she didn’t know what she was doing and got in a wreck. Now she wants him to pay her medical bills, and he wants her to pay to fix the bike. Will Judy give either one of them any cash or have they crashed out?

Judging Judy is a one-of-a-kind podcast that examines the social impact of one of America’s pop culture icons. For over three decades, Judy has impacted how we think about ourselves and each other. But, never before has the judge faced the same level of scrutiny she doled out from her big seat. That changes with Judging Judy.

Fans of All Fantasy Everything, Stephen Colbert, the Doughboys, John Oliver and Michael Ian Black will appreciate this podcast’s snarky attitude, challenging perspective and refreshing commentary on the cases and the judge.