I Know How to Build Safe Superintelligence | Yoshua Bengio, the most-cited AI researcher

I Know How to Build Safe Superintelligence | Yoshua Bengio, the most-cited AI researcher

The co-inventor of modern AI and the most cited living scientist believes he's figured out how to ensure AI is honest, incapable of deception, and never goes rogue. Yoshua Bengio – Turing Award Winner and founder of LawZero – is disturbed by the many unintended drives and goals present in today's AIs, their willingness to lie, and ability to tell when they're being tested. AI companies are trying to stamp out these behaviours in a 'cat-and-mouse game' that Yoshua fears they're losing.

But Yoshua is optimistic: he believes the companies can win this battle decisively with a single rearrangement to how AI models are trained, and has been developing mathematical proofs to back up the claim. The core idea is that instead of training AI to predict what a human would say, or to produce responses we'd rate highly, we should train it to model what's actually true.

Yoshua argues this new architecture, which he calls 'Scientist AI,' is a small enough change that we could keep almost all the techniques and data we use to train frontier AIs like Claude and ChatGPT. And that the new architecture need not cost more, could be built iteratively, and might be more capable as well as more honest.

Links to learn more, video, and full transcript: https://80k.info/bengio

Until recently, the biggest practical objection to Scientist AI was simple: the world wants agents, and Scientist AI isn’t one. But in new research, Yoshua has extended the design and believes the same honest predictor can be turned into a capable agent without losing its "safety guarantees."

With the Scientist AI proposal on the table, Yoshua argues that it's absurd to race to get current untrustworthy AI models to design their successors, which the leading companies are attempting to do as soon as possible.

But critics argue the approach wouldn't be so technically solid in practice, and that frontier capabilities are advancing so fast, and cost so much to match, that Scientist AI risks arriving too late to matter.

Host Rob Wiblin and AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio cover all this and more in today's conversation.

LawZero is hiring! https://80k.info/lawzero-jobs
Coefficient Giving is also hiring for a range of AI-related grantmaker roles: https://80k.info/ai-grantmaker-jobs


This episode was recorded on April 16, 2026.

Chapters:

  • Yoshua Bengio on making AI honest and safe (00:00:00)
  • The Scientist AI in plain English (00:02:26)
  • Yoshua on how Scientist AI differs from LLMs (00:06:33)
  • How the training data works (00:13:55)
  • Can this become an agent? (00:20:48)
  • Why Yoshua is more optimistic on alignment now (00:31:43)
  • Why companies can't stop racing (00:36:05)
  • How close to a working prototype? (00:48:27)
  • Honest models might be more capable (00:52:40)
  • "Reinforcement learning is evil" (01:00:28)
  • Scientist AI from guardrail to agent (01:07:31)
  • Can safe AI still be competent? (01:11:29)
  • How much will this cost? (01:18:17)
  • Can it generalise beyond maths and science? (01:22:13)
  • A UN for superintelligence (01:37:52)
  • Want to work with Yoshua Bengio? (01:49:32)
  • Why smart people ignore AI risk (01:53:00)
  • Don't let AI build the next AI (01:59:42)
  • Why the public doesn't get the real risk (02:10:34)
  • Why Yoshua changed his mind about AI risk (02:19:28)

Video and audio editing: Dominic Armstrong, Milo McGuire, Luke Monsour, and Simon Monsour
Camera operator: Jeremy Chevillotte
Production: Nick Stockton, Elizabeth Cox, and Katy Moore

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(334)

'95% of AI Pilots Fail': The hidden agenda behind the viral stat that misled millions

'95% of AI Pilots Fail': The hidden agenda behind the viral stat that misled millions

You might have heard that '95% of corporate AI pilots' are failing. It was one of the most widely cited AI statistics of 2025, parroted by media outlets everywhere. It helped trigger a Nasdaq selloff ...

28 Apr 10min

#242 – Will MacAskill on how we survive the 'intelligence explosion,' AI character, and the case for 'viatopia'

#242 – Will MacAskill on how we survive the 'intelligence explosion,' AI character, and the case for 'viatopia'

Hundreds of millions already turn to AI on the most personal of topics — therapy, political opinions, and how to treat others. And as AI takes over more of the economy, the character of these systems ...

22 Apr 3h 9min

Risks from power-seeking AI systems (article narration by Zershaaneh Qureshi)

Risks from power-seeking AI systems (article narration by Zershaaneh Qureshi)

Hundreds of prominent AI scientists and other notable figures signed a statement in 2023 saying that mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority. At 80,000 Hours, we’ve consi...

16 Apr 1h 29min

How scary is Claude Mythos? 303 pages in 21 minutes

How scary is Claude Mythos? 303 pages in 21 minutes

With Claude Mythos we have an AI that knows when it's being tested, can obscure its reasoning when it wants, and is better at breaking into (and out of) computers than any human alive. Rob Wiblin work...

10 Apr 21min

Village gossip, pesticide bans, and gene drives: 17 experts on the future of global health

Village gossip, pesticide bans, and gene drives: 17 experts on the future of global health

What does it really take to lift millions out of poverty and prevent needless deaths?In this special compilation episode, 17 past guests — including economists, nonprofit founders, and policy advisors...

7 Apr 4h 6min

What everyone is missing about Anthropic vs the Pentagon. And: The Meta leaks are worse than you think.

What everyone is missing about Anthropic vs the Pentagon. And: The Meta leaks are worse than you think.

When the Pentagon tried to strong-arm Anthropic into dropping its ban on AI-only kill decisions and mass domestic surveillance, the company refused. Its critics went on the attack: Anthropic and its s...

3 Apr 20min

#241 – Richard Moulange on how now AI codes viable genomes from scratch and outperforms virologists at lab work — what could go wrong?

#241 – Richard Moulange on how now AI codes viable genomes from scratch and outperforms virologists at lab work — what could go wrong?

Last September, scientists used an AI model to design genomes for entirely new bacteriophages (viruses that infect bacteria). They then built them in a lab. Many were viable. And despite being entirel...

31 Mar 3h 7min

Populært innen Fakta

fastlegen
dine-penger-pengeradet
relasjonspodden-med-dora-thorhallsdottir-kjersti-idem
rss-strid-de-norske-borgerkrigene
treningspodden
foreldreradet
rss-bisarr-historie
mikkels-paskenotter
jakt-og-fiskepodden
sinnsyn
rss-sarbar-med-lotte-erik
hverdagspsyken
hagespiren-podcast
rss-sunn-okonomi
rss-bak-luftfarten
gravid-uke-for-uke
rss-kunsten-a-leve
fryktlos
level-up-med-anniken-binz
rss-kull