James Robert Brown: Thought Experiments Reveal Mathematical Reality

James Robert Brown: Thought Experiments Reveal Mathematical Reality

James Robert Brown (University of Toronto) argues for mathematical Platonism and examines the Continuum Hypothesis He examines moral realism, the nature of mathematical objects, and debates free will versus physics while probing Platonism and alternative foundations.- 00:00:00 - Introduction- 00:01:17 - The connection between mathematics and ethics- 00:03:05 - Mathematical concepts that are interpreted solely physically (thick and thin concepts)- 00:16:33 - The continuum hypothesis- 00:19:23 - A counter proof to the continuum hypothesis- 00:24:45 - What's possible can have probability of zero (measure zero, technically)- 00:33:50 - Platonism and "thick" mathematical concepts- 00:34:39 - Moral realism / objectivity, without God- 00:36:59 - Does 2+2=5?- 00:40:43 - Moral intuitions as serving a marker for what's "correct"?- 00:46:42 - What's makes some theory correct beside its ability to predict / explain?- 00:47:54 - Does libertarian Free Will exist, and how is it coexistent with physics?- 00:53:13 - VIEWER TEST: Platonism test for the audience- 00:54:53 - Did Shakespeare invent Hamlet, or discover it?- 00:56:09 - What created the Platonic world?- 00:57:42 - Eternal vs Sempiternal- 00:59:12 - Thought experiments as a tool of probing physics, without experiment- 01:00:39 - Galileo's thought experiment demonstrating objects fall at the same rate despite different masses / heaviness- 01:03:39 - Thought experiment demonstrating relative motion (invariance of physical laws given uniform motion)- 01:05:01 - The Tower thought experiment demonstrating the opposite of the above- 01:09:43 - VIEWER TEST: Are you a Newtonian absolutist, or a Leibnizian relationalist?- 01:12:45 - Why did Prof Brown go into the philosophy of math, instead of directly into mathematics (or physics)?- 01:13:20 - Have any philosophical problems ever been solved?- 01:14:47 - Is God good? Or is goodness independent of God?- 01:15:41 - Descartes vs Leibniz on God's power (God can do anything -- except what's logically impossible)- 01:18:43 - The parochial view of physicists / mathematicians to dismiss what they can't define- 01:22:31 - Thought experiment from Newton regarding the necessity of space- 01:24:45 - Einstein's variation on the above thought experiment- 01:28:17 - How to classify thought experiments- 01:31:35 - Prof. Brown's thoughts on Wolfram's TOE and Eric Weinstein's TOE- 01:32:40 - Nicholas Gisin's thoughts on real numbers, and free will- 01:33:02 - What other foundations are there to physics, other than classical logic?- 01:39:05 - What does Mathematical Realism look like when it's NOT Platonic?- 01:45:31 - The physical laws themselves as abstract entities, which have causal power- 01:55:55 - Lee Smolin's Principle of Precedence as a bridge between Platonism and non-Platonism- 01:59:01 - Deriving an "ought" from an "is"- 02:03:29 - What does James not like about Sam Harris?- 02:06:45 - Is Math discovered or invented?- 02:10:18 - Does Platonism entail some idea of a God?- 02:14:49 - Theism vs Deism- 02:16:34 - On the Sokal Affair and the trouble with Postmodernism- 02:22:01 - Limits of free speech?- 02:27:41 - The problem of commercializing research- 02:33:09 - On Jordan Peterson's "Darwinian" definition of truthSPONSORS:- Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal- PayPal: https://bit.ly/2EOR0M4- Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt- iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal/id1521758802- Pandora: https://pdora.co/33b9lfP- Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e- Google Podcasts: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Id3k7k7mfzahfx2fjqmw3vufb44RESOURCES:- Graphics are included in the YouTube version to make it easier to comprehend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NV7BQZy1A6o- http://betterleftunsaidfilm.com Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal features long-form, technically detailed interviews with leading researchers in physics, mathematics, consciousness, and philosophy, exploring topics at the level of active research. For academics, graduate students, and anyone seeking depth beyond popular science. FOLLOW: Substack | Spotify | YouTube | Twitter Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episoder(340)

Bas van Fraassen: Why Science Does Not Reveal the Truth

Bas van Fraassen: Why Science Does Not Reveal the Truth

Professor Bas van Fraassen argues science doesn't deliver literal truth about reality, meaning unobservable physics is merely a model. He also contends the self isn't a thing and that logic permits fr...

15 Des 20252h 17min

Roger Penrose and Ivette Fuentes: A Bold New Test of Gravity

Roger Penrose and Ivette Fuentes: A Bold New Test of Gravity

Sir Roger Penrose and Professor Ivette Fuentes analyze the Ron Folman T-cubed experiment and whether the equivalence principle holds in quantum mechanics. They also detail gravity's role in wave funct...

25 Nov 20251h 13min

Curt Jaimungal: The Most Terrifying Philosopher I’ve Encountered

Curt Jaimungal: The Most Terrifying Philosopher I’ve Encountered

Curt Jaimungal dives into Kierkegaard’s three stages of life—aesthetic, ethical, and religious — showing how each promises freedom yet traps us in its own way. Through the lens of modern anxiety and c...

20 Nov 202518min

Ivette Fuentes: Quantum Gravity Predictions We Can Test Today

Ivette Fuentes: Quantum Gravity Predictions We Can Test Today

Professor Ivette Fuentes makes impossible physics testable, with verified predictions on the Casimir effect and quantum vacuum. Now she's building a "third way" to quantum gravity, a surprisingly simp...

10 Nov 20251h 9min

Curt Jaimungal: Can Physics Explain Its Own Laws?

Curt Jaimungal: Can Physics Explain Its Own Laws?

Why do physical laws have their specific form? Host Curt Jaimungal shows this question is a philosophical knot, because any "explanation" must itself stand on a law. Sponsors: - As a listener of TOE ...

5 Nov 202518min

Roger Penrose: Why The Big Bang Was Not The Beginning

Roger Penrose: Why The Big Bang Was Not The Beginning

Nobel laureate Sir Roger Penrose dismantles standard cosmology, arguing the Big Bang wasn't the beginning and quantum mechanics is fundamentally wrong. He then connects a real, gravitational wave func...

3 Nov 20251h 58min

Aaron Schurger: Neuroscience Does Not Threaten Free Will

Aaron Schurger: Neuroscience Does Not Threaten Free Will

The Libet experiment didn't kill free will, says professor of neuroscience Aaron Schurger; the brain's "readiness potential" is simply stochastic neural noise. We then tackle consciousness's role in i...

30 Okt 20251h 32min

Curt Jaimungal: Why I Don't Buy the Simulation Hypothesis (Nor Materialism)

Curt Jaimungal: Why I Don't Buy the Simulation Hypothesis (Nor Materialism)

Curt Jaimungal dismantles both the simulation hypothesis and materialism using consciousness arguments.One week ago, I (Curt Jaimungal) was invited to Niagara University to give the Peggy and John Day...

21 Okt 202557min

Populært innen Vitenskap

fastlegen
tingenes-tilstand
rekommandert
jss
rss-rekommandert
sinnsyn
liberal-halvtime
forskningno
dekodet-2
villmarksliv
rss-nysgjerrige-norge
rss-paradigmepodden
tomprat-med-gunnar-tjomlid
tidlose-historier
smart-forklart
fjellsportpodden
hva-er-greia-med
kvinnehelsepodden
vett-og-vitenskap-med-gaute-einevoll
rss-inn-til-kjernen-med-sunniva-rose