James Robert Brown: Thought Experiments Reveal Mathematical Reality

James Robert Brown: Thought Experiments Reveal Mathematical Reality

James Robert Brown (University of Toronto) argues for mathematical Platonism and examines the Continuum Hypothesis He examines moral realism, the nature of mathematical objects, and debates free will versus physics while probing Platonism and alternative foundations.- 00:00:00 - Introduction- 00:01:17 - The connection between mathematics and ethics- 00:03:05 - Mathematical concepts that are interpreted solely physically (thick and thin concepts)- 00:16:33 - The continuum hypothesis- 00:19:23 - A counter proof to the continuum hypothesis- 00:24:45 - What's possible can have probability of zero (measure zero, technically)- 00:33:50 - Platonism and "thick" mathematical concepts- 00:34:39 - Moral realism / objectivity, without God- 00:36:59 - Does 2+2=5?- 00:40:43 - Moral intuitions as serving a marker for what's "correct"?- 00:46:42 - What's makes some theory correct beside its ability to predict / explain?- 00:47:54 - Does libertarian Free Will exist, and how is it coexistent with physics?- 00:53:13 - VIEWER TEST: Platonism test for the audience- 00:54:53 - Did Shakespeare invent Hamlet, or discover it?- 00:56:09 - What created the Platonic world?- 00:57:42 - Eternal vs Sempiternal- 00:59:12 - Thought experiments as a tool of probing physics, without experiment- 01:00:39 - Galileo's thought experiment demonstrating objects fall at the same rate despite different masses / heaviness- 01:03:39 - Thought experiment demonstrating relative motion (invariance of physical laws given uniform motion)- 01:05:01 - The Tower thought experiment demonstrating the opposite of the above- 01:09:43 - VIEWER TEST: Are you a Newtonian absolutist, or a Leibnizian relationalist?- 01:12:45 - Why did Prof Brown go into the philosophy of math, instead of directly into mathematics (or physics)?- 01:13:20 - Have any philosophical problems ever been solved?- 01:14:47 - Is God good? Or is goodness independent of God?- 01:15:41 - Descartes vs Leibniz on God's power (God can do anything -- except what's logically impossible)- 01:18:43 - The parochial view of physicists / mathematicians to dismiss what they can't define- 01:22:31 - Thought experiment from Newton regarding the necessity of space- 01:24:45 - Einstein's variation on the above thought experiment- 01:28:17 - How to classify thought experiments- 01:31:35 - Prof. Brown's thoughts on Wolfram's TOE and Eric Weinstein's TOE- 01:32:40 - Nicholas Gisin's thoughts on real numbers, and free will- 01:33:02 - What other foundations are there to physics, other than classical logic?- 01:39:05 - What does Mathematical Realism look like when it's NOT Platonic?- 01:45:31 - The physical laws themselves as abstract entities, which have causal power- 01:55:55 - Lee Smolin's Principle of Precedence as a bridge between Platonism and non-Platonism- 01:59:01 - Deriving an "ought" from an "is"- 02:03:29 - What does James not like about Sam Harris?- 02:06:45 - Is Math discovered or invented?- 02:10:18 - Does Platonism entail some idea of a God?- 02:14:49 - Theism vs Deism- 02:16:34 - On the Sokal Affair and the trouble with Postmodernism- 02:22:01 - Limits of free speech?- 02:27:41 - The problem of commercializing research- 02:33:09 - On Jordan Peterson's "Darwinian" definition of truthSPONSORS:- Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal- PayPal: https://bit.ly/2EOR0M4- Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt- iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal/id1521758802- Pandora: https://pdora.co/33b9lfP- Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e- Google Podcasts: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Id3k7k7mfzahfx2fjqmw3vufb44RESOURCES:- Graphics are included in the YouTube version to make it easier to comprehend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NV7BQZy1A6o- http://betterleftunsaidfilm.com Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal features long-form, technically detailed interviews with leading researchers in physics, mathematics, consciousness, and philosophy, exploring topics at the level of active research. For academics, graduate students, and anyone seeking depth beyond popular science. FOLLOW: Substack | Spotify | YouTube | Twitter Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episoder(341)

Curt Jaimungal: Can Physics Explain Its Own Laws?

Curt Jaimungal: Can Physics Explain Its Own Laws?

Why do physical laws have their specific form? Host Curt Jaimungal shows this question is a philosophical knot, because any "explanation" must itself stand on a law. Sponsors: - As a listener of TOE ...

5 Nov 202518min

Roger Penrose: Why The Big Bang Was Not The Beginning

Roger Penrose: Why The Big Bang Was Not The Beginning

Nobel laureate Sir Roger Penrose dismantles standard cosmology, arguing the Big Bang wasn't the beginning and quantum mechanics is fundamentally wrong. He then connects a real, gravitational wave func...

3 Nov 20251h 58min

Aaron Schurger: Neuroscience Does Not Threaten Free Will

Aaron Schurger: Neuroscience Does Not Threaten Free Will

The Libet experiment didn't kill free will, says professor of neuroscience Aaron Schurger; the brain's "readiness potential" is simply stochastic neural noise. We then tackle consciousness's role in i...

30 Okt 20251h 32min

Curt Jaimungal: Why I Don't Buy the Simulation Hypothesis (Nor Materialism)

Curt Jaimungal: Why I Don't Buy the Simulation Hypothesis (Nor Materialism)

Curt Jaimungal dismantles both the simulation hypothesis and materialism using consciousness arguments.One week ago, I (Curt Jaimungal) was invited to Niagara University to give the Peggy and John Day...

21 Okt 202557min

Yakir Aharonov: The Future Propagates Backward in Quantum Theory

Yakir Aharonov: The Future Propagates Backward in Quantum Theory

Yakir Aharonov argues quantum reality requires future states to propagate backward in time.Physicist Yakir Aharonov argues that the standard story of quantum mechanics is wrong, proposing a time-symme...

13 Okt 202550min

David Deutsch: Einstein Would Fail Modern Grant Applications

David Deutsch: Einstein Would Fail Modern Grant Applications

David Deutsch argues that Einstein would struggle to secure modern research grants, exposing how funding systems favor incremental work over bold, fundamental ideas. He connects this bias to quantum c...

6 Okt 20252h 18min

Wayne Myrvold: Entropy Isn't Real; It's What You Don't Know

Wayne Myrvold: Entropy Isn't Real; It's What You Don't Know

Wayne Myrvold reinterprets thermodynamics as a resource theory, arguing that the slogan “entropy always increases” follows from the second law rather than defining it. The conversation contrasts Gibbs...

29 Sep 20252h 5min

Michael Levin and Anil Seth: Your Brain Is Not a Computer

Michael Levin and Anil Seth: Your Brain Is Not a Computer

Anil Seth and Michael Levin debate whether brains are computers, how consciousness relates to substrate, and if algorithms can ever capture life and mind. Levin argues machines can access a platonic s...

22 Sep 20251h 12min

Populært innen Vitenskap

fastlegen
tingenes-tilstand
rekommandert
jss
rss-nysgjerrige-norge
liberal-halvtime
forskningno
sinnsyn
villmarksliv
rss-overskuddsliv
fjellsportpodden
rss-paradigmepodden
rss-rekommandert
rss-inn-til-kjernen-med-sunniva-rose
nordnorsk-historie
kvinnehelsepodden
rss-bondevennen
tomprat-med-gunnar-tjomlid
abels-tarn
rss-zahid-ali-hjelper-deg