Judge Sweets Order Denying Maxwell's Request For Summary Judgement Against Virginia (Part 5-6) (8/24/25)
In his ruling dated April 27, 2017, Judge Sweet denied Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that the case could not be dismissed before trial because there were triable issues of material fact—meaning that reasonable jurors could differ on key factual elements required to resolve the defamation claims. Additionally, he held that the pre‑litigation privilege Maxwell invoked (a legal shield often applied to internal or preliminary communications before a lawsuit is filed) did not apply to bar the claim. Consequently, the motion could not succeed as a matter of law. Judge Sweet also directed the parties to submit a proposed redacted version of the opinion consistent with the protective order or to notify the court if no redactions were necessary, emphasizing the sensitive nature of the materials involvedThis decision ensured that Maxwell’s defamation case would proceed, allowing for full adjudication of disputable facts rather than prematurely ending the litigation. Moreover, although the summary judgment denial was itself sealed under protective orders—primarily due to concerns about privacy and confidentiality—the Second Circuit later determined that such judicial records should generally be accessible to the public, underscoring the importance of transparency in decisions impacting public interest; the appellate court directed review and unsealing of summary judgment materials following a careful balance of privacy interests.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
24 Aug 21min
Judge Sweets Order Denying Maxwell's Request For Summary Judgement Against Virginia (Part 3-4) (8/23/25)
In his ruling dated April 27, 2017, Judge Sweet denied Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that the case could not be dismissed before trial because there were triable issues of material fact—meaning that reasonable jurors could differ on key factual elements required to resolve the defamation claims. Additionally, he held that the pre‑litigation privilege Maxwell invoked (a legal shield often applied to internal or preliminary communications before a lawsuit is filed) did not apply to bar the claim. Consequently, the motion could not succeed as a matter of law. Judge Sweet also directed the parties to submit a proposed redacted version of the opinion consistent with the protective order or to notify the court if no redactions were necessary, emphasizing the sensitive nature of the materials involvedThis decision ensured that Maxwell’s defamation case would proceed, allowing for full adjudication of disputable facts rather than prematurely ending the litigation. Moreover, although the summary judgment denial was itself sealed under protective orders—primarily due to concerns about privacy and confidentiality—the Second Circuit later determined that such judicial records should generally be accessible to the public, underscoring the importance of transparency in decisions impacting public interest; the appellate court directed review and unsealing of summary judgment materials following a careful balance of privacy interests.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
24 Aug 29min
Judge Sweets Order Denying Maxwell's Request For Summary Judgement Against Virginia (Part 1-2) (8/23/25)
In his ruling dated April 27, 2017, Judge Sweet denied Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that the case could not be dismissed before trial because there were triable issues of material fact—meaning that reasonable jurors could differ on key factual elements required to resolve the defamation claims. Additionally, he held that the pre‑litigation privilege Maxwell invoked (a legal shield often applied to internal or preliminary communications before a lawsuit is filed) did not apply to bar the claim. Consequently, the motion could not succeed as a matter of law. Judge Sweet also directed the parties to submit a proposed redacted version of the opinion consistent with the protective order or to notify the court if no redactions were necessary, emphasizing the sensitive nature of the materials involvedThis decision ensured that Maxwell’s defamation case would proceed, allowing for full adjudication of disputable facts rather than prematurely ending the litigation. Moreover, although the summary judgment denial was itself sealed under protective orders—primarily due to concerns about privacy and confidentiality—the Second Circuit later determined that such judicial records should generally be accessible to the public, underscoring the importance of transparency in decisions impacting public interest; the appellate court directed review and unsealing of summary judgment materials following a careful balance of privacy interests.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
24 Aug 25min
Did Bryan Kohberger Have Contact With Any Of The Victims Before The Murders?
From the archives: 4-2-23One of the main questions that still needs to be answered when talking about Bryan Kohberger and the murders in moscow, is what motivated him to allegedly kill four people? We have learned a little bit more as the story has evolved, such as him following his victims on social media according to sources, but when looking at the warrants that have been executed and the timeframe in which they cover, could Bryan Kohberger have been following his victims much longer than previously thought?Let's dive in and talk about it!(commercial at 10:22)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cops are probing if Bryan Kohberger had contact with university students the YEAR before slayings | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
24 Aug 17min
Joe Giacalone Comments On The House Being Released As A Crime Scene
A forensic team plays a crucial role in investigating and analyzing a crime scene to gather evidence and information that can aid in solving crimes and prosecuting offenders. Here is a summary of what a forensic team does at a crime scene:Scene Assessment: The team starts by assessing the crime scene's overall situation, including securing it to preserve evidence and ensuring the safety of all personnel involved.Documentation: Detailed documentation is crucial. They photograph, sketch, and make written notes of the entire scene, including the layout, positions of objects, and any potential evidence.Evidence Collection: Forensic experts collect physical evidence, such as fingerprints, blood samples, hair fibers, weapons, and other items that might be relevant to the case. They use proper techniques and tools to prevent contamination.Trace Evidence: Specialized personnel collect trace evidence like fibers, soil, and gunshot residue, which can provide valuable clues about the crime's circumstances.Biological Evidence: Forensic biologists collect and preserve biological samples like blood, saliva, or tissue for DNA analysis, which can link suspects or victims to the scene.Latent Print Examination: Experts search for and lift latent fingerprints from surfaces, using various techniques such as dusting, chemical development, or photography.Ballistics Examination: Firearms experts examine firearms and ammunition, analyze gunshot residue, and match bullets and casings to specific weapons if necessary.Toxicology Analysis: Toxicologists may collect samples to determine if drugs, alcohol, or other substances were involved in the crime.Digital Evidence: Digital forensic specialists can examine electronic devices such as computers or smartphones to recover data, including text messages, emails, or images relevant to the case.Autopsy: If a death occurred, forensic pathologists perform autopsies to determine the cause and manner of death, collecting valuable evidence for the investigation.Footwear and Tire Impression Analysis: Experts may analyze footwear and tire impressions left at the scene to identify potential suspects or vehicles.Expert Testimony: Forensic experts may testify in court as expert witnesses to explain their findings and how they relate to the case.Evidence Preservation: Properly storing and preserving collected evidence is essential to maintaining its integrity for future analysis and use in court.Chain of Custody: The team maintains a strict chain of custody for all evidence to ensure its admissibility in court and prevent contamination or tampering.Crime Scene Reconstruction: Based on the evidence collected and analyzed, forensic experts may attempt to reconstruct the sequence of events that transpired at the crime scene.Report Writing: Forensic professionals create comprehensive reports detailing their findings, methods, and conclusions, which are crucial for investigators and legal proceedings.The work of a forensic team is meticulous and critical in helping law enforcement solve crimes and bring perpetrators to justice. Their objective, scientific analysis of evidence can be instrumental in building a strong case for prosecution or exonerating the innocent.In this episode we hear from form Joe Giacalone about the crime scene and how the evidence was collected at that crime scene and the similarities he sees between the investigation in Moscow and the one into Amanda Knox in Italy.(commercial at 7:45)to contactbobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders' chilling similarity to Amanda Knox crime scene revealed by ex-cop who highlights key piece of evidence | The US Sun (the-sun.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
24 Aug 11min
12 Questions About The Investigation Into The Murders (Part 2)
From the archives: 12-27-22In part one of this two part deep dive, we take a look at twelve of the biggest questions in the investigation into the murder of Xana, Ethan, Madison and Kaylee and where the investigators are currently at in regards to each of the questions presented.Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:21)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders: Key questions to solve what happened in university student slayings | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
23 Aug 23min
12 Questions About The Investigation Into The Murders (Part 1)
From the archives: 12-27-22In part one of this two part deep dive, we take a look at twelve of the biggest questions in the investigation into the murder of Xana, Ethan, Madison and Kaylee and where the investigators are currently at in regards to each of the questions presented.Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:21)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders: Key questions to solve what happened in university student slayings | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
23 Aug 18min
Ghislaine Maxwell's DOJ Interview: No Names, No Justice, No Surprise (8/23/25)
The Department of Justice’s release of the Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts is nothing but theater—a sham staged to protect the powerful and slam the door shut on the Epstein saga. Maxwell, a convicted trafficker, was granted immunity and a microphone to mock survivors, erase the notion of a client list, and cast doubt on Epstein’s death, all while the DOJ used her denials as a shield. The scandal isn’t that these transcripts were released—it’s that the interview happened at all, that the government legitimized a predator’s voice and tried to use it as “closure” for the most explosive trafficking scandal of our time.But this isn’t closure—it’s desperation. They want the public exhausted, numb, and willing to accept Maxwell’s lies as the final word. Yet those who’ve been in the trenches since the beginning know better. This doesn’t end because she says it ends. Every denial and every carefully managed release only proves the cover-up is alive, the names are still hidden, and the truth is still too dangerous to reveal. The DOJ can trot out Maxwell as their mouthpiece, but it won’t work—this fight isn’t over, and when the reckoning comes, it won’t be Maxwell or the elites doing the laughing.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
23 Aug 15min
