Mega Edition: Danielle Bensky And The Lawsuit Filed Against Indyke And Kahn (Part 1-2) (10/25/25)

Mega Edition: Danielle Bensky And The Lawsuit Filed Against Indyke And Kahn (Part 1-2) (10/25/25)

Background of the Lawsuit
  1. Defendants:
    • Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.
  2. Plaintiffs:
    • Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.
    • Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.
Allegations and Claims
  1. Mismanagement and Negligence:
    • Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein’s estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate’s affairs.
    • Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate’s value and its ability to settle claims.
  2. Failure to Address Victims’ Claims:
    • Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein’s victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.
    • Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate’s assets and the status of the victims’ claims.
Legal Proceedings
  1. Filing and Court Actions:
    • Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.
    • Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.
  2. Recent Developments:
    • Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.
    • Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.
Broader Context
  1. Epstein’s Estate:
    • Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein’s estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate’s management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein’s criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.
    • Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein’s estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.
  2. Victims’ Advocacy:
    • Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein’s abuse.


(commercial at 8:16)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Avsnitt(1000)

CIA Kompromat 101: Jeffrey Epstein and the CIA’s Culture of Compromise (Part 1) (8/23/25)

CIA Kompromat 101: Jeffrey Epstein and the CIA’s Culture of Compromise (Part 1) (8/23/25)

Jeffrey Epstein’s life makes little sense when viewed through the lens of a rogue financier or even a Mossad agent, but it becomes coherent when understood as the creation of the CIA. From his early placement at the Dalton School by Donald Barr, to his sudden leap into finance at Bear Stearns, to his inexplicable relationship with Leslie Wexner, Epstein’s career looks less like chance and more like cultivation. His fortune was smoke and mirrors, likely bolstered by covert funding, and his so-called philanthropy in genetics and AI neatly overlapped with U.S. intelligence interests. His homes wired with cameras, his blackmail operations ensnaring politicians, scientists, and billionaires, and his sweetheart deal in Florida that shielded not just him but his co-conspirators—all of it suggests he was protected because he was too valuable to the intelligence state to lose.While Mossad connections through Ghislaine Maxwell cannot be denied, foreign services couldn’t have orchestrated the decades-long media suppression, the unprecedented non-prosecution agreement, or the circumstances of Epstein’s death in federal custody. Only U.S. intelligence had the power to build and protect him, then silence him when he became a liability. Epstein was not simply a predator; he was a CIA instrument of blackmail and control, designed to compromise America’s own elites and keep them in line. His death was not the end of a scandal—it was the final act of a cleanup operation, ensuring that the files, tapes, and evidence he gathered would never see daylight, and leaving the public with a scapegoat narrative while the machinery of secrecy rolled on.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

23 Aug 12min

In Their Own Words:  Annie Farmer And Her Claims Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate (8/23/25)

In Their Own Words: Annie Farmer And Her Claims Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate (8/23/25)

Annie Farmer’s lawsuit against the Jeffrey Epstein estate details her experience as one of the youngest known victims in his trafficking network. She alleges that she was lured in 1996, when she was just 16 years old, under the guise of attending a career-oriented retreat in New Mexico. Instead, she was brought to Epstein’s secluded Zorro Ranch, where she was subjected to inappropriate touching and sexual assault. The lawsuit states that Ghislaine Maxwell was directly involved in orchestrating the abuse—posing as a mentor figure and participating in grooming tactics that made the encounter appear safe and professional, when in fact it was anything but.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

23 Aug 33min

Mega Edition:  How Did Virginia Roberts Meet Prince Andrew?  (8/23/25)

Mega Edition: How Did Virginia Roberts Meet Prince Andrew? (8/23/25)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre has long alleged that she was introduced to Prince Andrew through Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2001, when she was 17 years old. According to her account, she first met the Duke of York at Maxwell’s London townhouse, where she was allegedly instructed to provide him with sexual services. Giuffre has said that Epstein and Maxwell orchestrated the encounter and pressured her into the situation, presenting Andrew as another powerful man within Epstein’s circle. A now-famous photograph shows Prince Andrew with his arm around Giuffre’s waist, with Maxwell smiling in the background—an image that has become central to her claims.She further alleges that Epstein arranged two additional encounters: one at his Manhattan mansion and another on his private Caribbean island, Little St. James. In each instance, Giuffre has maintained she was directed to be intimate with Andrew as part of Epstein’s trafficking operation. Prince Andrew has categorically denied her claims, publicly stating he has “no recollection” of ever meeting her, disputing the photo’s authenticity, and maintaining that he never engaged in sexual activity with her.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10930179/NIGEL-CAWTHORNE-reveals-Virginia-Roberts-introduced-Prince-Andrew.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

23 Aug 36min

Mega Edition: The USVI And Their Motion In Opposition To JP Morgan's Request For Dismissal (Part 3-4) (8/23/25)

Mega Edition: The USVI And Their Motion In Opposition To JP Morgan's Request For Dismissal (Part 3-4) (8/23/25)

The U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) filed a motion opposing JPMorgan Chase's request to dismiss the lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI argues that JPMorgan played a crucial role in enabling and facilitating Epstein's illegal activities by maintaining his accounts and providing financial services, despite knowing about his criminal conduct. The motion asserts that the bank ignored numerous red flags and allowed Epstein to conduct transactions that supported his sex trafficking operation.The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

23 Aug 25min

Mega Edition: The USVI And Their Motion In Opposition To JP Morgan's Request For Dismissal (Part 1-2) (8/22/25)

Mega Edition: The USVI And Their Motion In Opposition To JP Morgan's Request For Dismissal (Part 1-2) (8/22/25)

The U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) filed a motion opposing JPMorgan Chase's request to dismiss the lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI argues that JPMorgan played a crucial role in enabling and facilitating Epstein's illegal activities by maintaining his accounts and providing financial services, despite knowing about his criminal conduct. The motion asserts that the bank ignored numerous red flags and allowed Epstein to conduct transactions that supported his sex trafficking operation.The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

23 Aug 22min

Judge Marshall Drops A Gag Order Over The Bryan Kohberger Investigation

Judge Marshall Drops A Gag Order Over The Bryan Kohberger Investigation

From the archives: 1-4-23The Judge overseeing the Bryan Kohberger trial has issued a gag order in the case that will prevent anyone working with the prosecution or the defense from speaking about the case with the media. The judge issued the order after Bryan Kohberger waived his right to extradition.So, what does the gag order mean?Let's dive in and see!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com(commercial at 7:05)source:Idaho murders: Judge issues gag order blocking officials, defense from discussing case against Bryan Kohberger | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

23 Aug 11min

The Moscow PD Denies Keeping Families In The Dark During The Early Stages Of The Investigation

The Moscow PD Denies Keeping Families In The Dark During The Early Stages Of The Investigation

From the archives: 12-22-22On this edition of the morning update, we are diving right back into the headlines from overnight and taking a look at where the investigation currently stands as of this morning.(commercial at 8:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders updates: Moscow police deny families are ‘left in dark’ as university offers self-defence classes | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

23 Aug 13min

The Goncalves Family Hires A Lawyer To Represent Their Interests

The Goncalves Family Hires A Lawyer To Represent Their Interests

From the archives: 12-7-22The father of murdered college student, Kaylee Goncalves has retained the services of a lawyer according to reports. Mr. Goncalves has been very outspoken about the investigation up to this point and has even said he is losing confidence in it.The investigators maintain that the reason for their silence is the integrity of the investigation.(commercial at 10:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11509959/Father-murdered-Idaho-student-retains-lawyer-considers-suing-inept-Idaho-police.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

22 Aug 18min

Populärt inom Politik & nyheter

aftonbladet-krim
p3-krim
fordomspodden
motiv
rss-krimstad
rss-viva-fotboll
flashback-forever
aftonbladet-daily
svenska-fall
rss-vad-fan-hande
rss-krimreportrarna
rss-sanning-konsekvens
dagens-eko
olyckan-inifran
rss-frandfors-horna
rss-svalan-krim
krimmagasinet
blenda-2
rss-klubbland-en-podd-mest-om-frolunda
rss-flodet